2 M. MAMMADOV AND P. SZUCA
required for continuous time systems. The majority of them deal with the (dis-
counted and undiscounted) integral functionals. We mention here the approaches
developed by Rockafellar [33, 34], Scheinkman, Brock and collaborators (see, for
example, [21, 35]), Cass and Shell [4], Leizarowitz [18], Mamedov [24], Montrucchio
[29], Zaslavski [37, 38, 39] (we refer to [2, 36] for more references).
In this paper we consider an optimal control problem in discrete time. It extends
the results obtained in [23] where a special class of terminal functionals is introduced
as a lower limit at infinity of utility functions. This approach allowed to establish
the turnpike property for a much broader class of optimal control problems than
those involving integral functionals (discounted and undiscounted).
Later, this class of terminal functionals was used to establish a connection be-
tween the turnpike theory and the notion of statistical convergence [25, 32]; as a
result, the convergence of optimal trajectories is proved in terms of the statistical
(“almost”) convergence. These terminal functionals also allowed the extension of
the turnpike theory to time delay systems; the first results in this area have been
established in several recent papers [13, 26]. Moreover, some generalizations based
on the notion of the A-statistical cluster points have been obtained in [7].
The main purpose of this paper is to formulate the optimality criteria by using the
notion of ideal convergence. As detailed in the next section, the ideal convergence is
a more general concept than the statistical convergence as well as the A-statistical
convergence. In this way the turnpike property is established for a broad class of
non-convex optimal control problems where the asymptotical stability of optimal
trajectories is formulated in terms of the ideal convergence.
Recently (and independently) Leonetti and Caprio in [19] considered turnpike
property for ideals invariant under translation in the context of normed vector
spaces. We discuss our approaches in Section 4.
The rest of this article is organized as follows. In the next section the defini-
tion of the ideal, its properties and some particular cases, including the statistical
convergence, are provided. In Section 3 we formulate the optimal control problem
and main assumptions. The main results of the paper — the turnpike theorems are
provided in Section 4. The proof of the main theorem is in Section 5.
2. Convergence with respect to ideal vs statistical convergence
Let x= (xn)n∈Nbe a sequence of elements of Rm. For the sake of simplicity, we
will consider the Euclidean norm k·k .The classical definition of convergence of x
to asays that for every ε > 0 the set of all n∈Nwith kxn−ak ≥ εis finite, i.e.
it is “small” in some sense. If we understand the word “small” as “of asymptotic
density zero” then we obtain the definition of statistical convergence (Def. 6). The
same method can be used to formulate the definition of statistical cluster point.
The classical one says that ais a cluster point of xif for every ε > 0 the set of all
n∈Nwith kxn−ak< ε is infinite, i.e. it has “many” elements. If “many” means
“not of asymptotic density zero” then we obtain the definition of statistical cluster
point (see e.g. [12]).
One of the possible generalizations of this kind of being “small” (having “many”
elements) is “belonging to the ideal” (“be an element of co-ideal”).
The cardinality of a set Xis denoted by #X.P(N) denotes the power set of N.