
Johannes Hofmann and Wilhelm Zwerger 3
with the angular momentum quantum number mintroduced below). Note that, in contrast to
the electronic problem, the effective magnetic length ℓB=pħ/(eB )eff =pħ/2m∗Ωnow scales
inversely with the mass m∗, while the effective cyclotron frequency ωc=2Ωis independent of
it. In the presence of an additional harmonic confinement with frequency ω, the single-particle
levels in the x,y-plane are then of the form [9]
E(n)
j=ħ(ω−Ω)·j+ħ(ω+Ω)·n, (2)
where we drop a constant zero-point energy ħω. In the limit Ω→ω−and for given n=0,1, . ..,
these energies group into a series of degenerate levels labelled by their angular momentum
m=j−n= −n,−n+1.. ., which constitute an analog of the nth Landau level. In particular, the
LLL corresponds to n=0 with a degenerate set of single-particle levels labelled by the angular
momentum quantum number m=j≥0. In the following, we use as a characteristic length scale
the harmonic oscillator length
ℓ=sħ
m∗ω, (3)
which differs by a factor of p2 from the effective magnetic length ℓBin the LLL limit. Quite
generally, the restriction to the LLL requires that |Vm|/ħω→0 in order to suppress transitions
between different Landau levels, where |Vm|is the characteristic magnitude of the Haldane
pseudopotentials formally introduced in Eq. (8) below. For bosons, the dominant interaction is
V0= ħω·e
g2/2π[10], which arises from the standard zero-range pseudopotential with scattering
length adiscussed above. Exceptions arise, however, if the short-range scattering length is tuned
to zero or in the presence of dipolar interactions, where—in a minimal model—both V0and V2
need to included [11]. Note that since the dimensionless parameter e
g2parametrizes an s-wave
interaction, it takes the same form for any rotation frequency and is thus independent of the
magnetic length ℓB, cf. App. A. The condition V0/ħω∼e
g2≪1 for staying in the LLL corresponds
to the perturbative limit with respect to the harmonic oscillator spacing, for which the running
of the interaction strength due to the renormalization of the coupling is negligible. Since e
g2≲0.1
generically, the LLL condition is well obeyed in practice1.
For bosons, the filling factor ν=n2(πℓ2) in the LLL (n2is the 2D particle density) may take
arbitrary large values. In particular, for a gas with Nparticles in a rotating harmonic trap [9],
ν≃¡N(1 −Ω/ω)/ e
g2¢1/2 (4)
scales like pNat a fixed value of 1 −Ω/ω≪1. In the regime of large filling factors ν≫1, which
is the one that has been explored mostly so far, bosons can be described in terms of a coherent
state picture. In particular, the ground state is a regular array of vortices, which is predicted to
melt into a strongly correlated vortex liquid at around ν≃10 [12] (for a review, see Ref. [10]). From
Eq. (4), the condition for reaching filling factors of order unity requires 1 −Ω/ω≲e
g2/N, which
places the gas very close to an unstable configuration where the harmonic trap can no longer
overcome the centrifugal force. As a result, a number of alternative routes have been proposed
to realize Bose gases in the LLL in a regime where mean-field theory no longer applies, such as
optical flux lattices [13,14] or periodically driven systems, where a nonvanishing gauge field arises
in the effective Floquet Hamiltonian [15, 16]. This idea has been implemented successfully in a
recent experiment by Léonard et al [17], where a strongly correlated state with ν=1/2 has been
observed with N=2 bosons in an optical lattice. Earlier, the physics of strongly interacting bosons
in the LLL has also been realized with photons in a twisted optical cavity, where the repulsion
results from an effective interaction mediated by Rydberg atoms [18]. Moreover, a quite different
1Note that the relevant dimensionless interaction strength within the LLL is set by V0/ħ(ω−Ω) and thus becomes
strong for Ω→ω−.
C. R. Physique — Draft, 19th June 2023