Spin State Evolution of 99942 Apophis during its 2029 Earth Encounter Conor J. Benson Daniel J. Scheeres University of Colorado Boulder 3775 Discovery Drive Boulder CO 80303 USA

2025-05-03 0 0 3.8MB 20 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Spin State Evolution of (99942) Apophis during its 2029 Earth Encounter
Conor J. Benson, Daniel J. Scheeres
University of Colorado Boulder, 3775 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
Marina Brozovi´c, Steven Chesley
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Petr Pravec, Petr Scheirich
Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Friˇcova 1, CZ-25165 Ondˇrejov, Czech Republic
Abstract
We explore the effects of the 2029 Earth encounter on asteroid (99942) Apophis’ non-principal axis
spin state, leveraging refined orbit, spin state, and inertia information provided by more recent optical and
radar observations. Propagating the asteroids’ coupled orbit and rigid body attitude dynamics through the
flyby, we present the range of possible post-flyby spin states. These spin state distributions will be valuable
for planning Apophis observation campaigns and spacecraft missions, most notably OSIRIS-APEX. The
simulations indicate that gravitationally induced changes to the asteroid’s tumbling periods and rotational
angular momentum direction (pole) will likely be significant and measurable. For the current spin state
and inertia estimates and their uncertainties, Apophis is likely to remain in a short axis mode (SAM)
tumbling state but its effective spin rate could halve or double. Its pole is likely to shift by 10 degrees or
more and increase in longitude while moving closer to the ecliptic plane. These spin state changes are very
sensitive to the asteroid’s close approach attitude and mass distribution. With ground-based tracking of
the asteroid’s spin state through the encounter, this sensitivity will help refine mass distribution knowledge.
We also discuss the implications of this abrupt spin state alteration for Apophis’ Yarkovsky acceleration
and geophysical properties, identifying possible pathways for surface and internal changes, most notably
if Apophis is a contact binary. Comparison of the pre and post-flyby inertia estimates obtained from the
ground-based observations will help assess the extent of possible geophysical changes.
Keywords: Asteroids, dynamics; Asteroids, rotation; Near-Earth objects
Preprint submitted to Elsevier October 25, 2022
arXiv:2210.13365v1 [astro-ph.EP] 24 Oct 2022
1. Introduction
On April 13, 2029 asteroid (99942) Apophis will make a close approach to the Earth, coming within 6
Earth radii from the geocenter. This unprecedented flyby offers a unique opportunity to learn about small
body evolution and has been highlighted in the Planetary Science Decadal Survey (National Academies
of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2022). It is an event that will drive much planning and analysis.
Of particular interest is NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX mission, which is set to rendezvous with Apophis several
months after the asteroid’s 2029 Earth encounter (DellaGuistina et al., 2022). The close approach will
have a significant impact on two aspects of Apophis’ dynamic state, its orbit and its rotation. In this
paper we revisit an analysis by Scheeres et al. (2005) conducted shortly after Apophis’ discovery in 2004
that studied the range of possible spin states the asteroid could have following its close approach flyby.
Given the limited observations up to that point, this study was subject to large uncertainties in the close
approach distance and asteroid physical properties. From preliminary light curve analysis, the asteroid was
modeled as a triaxial ellipsoid in uniform rotation about its maximum inertia axis. In our current analysis,
we take advantage of Apophis’ greatly constrained orbit, spin state, and shape made possible by extensive
subsequent observations. Specifically, we draw from much richer knowledge of its non-principal axis rotation
state and shape obtained from optical (Pravec et al., 2014) and radar (Brozovi´c et al., 2018) measurements.
These important refinements greatly improve the modeling of the effects of Apophis’ Earth encounter and
will provide a realistic range of post-flyby spin states that may be expected.
This analysis supports several important scientific aspects. First, the flyby will provide insight into
the asteroid’s mass distribution and interior based on the observed changes in its spin state. When the
actual moments of inertia are compared to those derived from the constant density asteroid shape model,
the extent of Apophis’ density homogeneity can be explored. Discrepancies between the shape-derived and
actual moments of inertia could indicate density variations across the asteroid’s surface and/or interior. The
convex shape model solution of Pravec et al. (2014) shows some discrepancy between these inertias. But it
is very possible that these differences are due to surface concavities that cannot be resolved with current
optical observations. The radar observations suggest that Apophis has a bi-lobed shape (Brozovi´c et al.,
2018), supporting this hypothesis. Improvements in shape and spin state provided by future observations,
particularly those around the 2029 encounter, should allow for further refinements to the shape, flyby-
induced evolution, and mass distribution. Detailed knowledge of Apophis’ spin state and mass distribution
will be crucial for planning and operating in-situ missions such as OSIRIS-APEX.
These spin state simulation results will allow also us to predict the range of surface accelerations and
2
global stresses that will be placed across the body during its closest approach. Previous work by Scheeres
et al. (2005), DeMartini et al. (2019), and Hirabayashi et al. (2021) explored the geophysical implications
of the flyby. All three studies make simplifying assumptions about the pre-encounter spin state and its
uncertainty. Both Scheeres et al. (2005) and DeMartini et al. (2019) do not account for the asteroid’s non-
principal axis rotation. Hirabayashi et al. (2021) consider the full Pravec et al. (2014) spin state solution but
do not account for current uncertainties in Apophis’ tumbling periods and rotational angular momentum
direction (pole) and the resulting increase in possible close encounter attitudes. Souchay et al. (2018)
explore the effects of the encounter on Apophis’ pole direction using the Pravec et al. (2014) solutions and
their uncertainties, but they assume the asteroid is uniformly rotating about its maximum inertia axis.
Furthermore, Souchay et al. (2018) do not explore how the asteroid’s tumbling periods will change due
to the gravitational torques. In this work, we conduct rigid body dynamical modeling that accounts for
both the asteroid’s non-principal axis rotation and initial condition uncertainties. We present post-flyby
distributions for both the pole and tumbling periods, providing a complete picture of possible encounter
outcomes from which to address geophysical implications. These predictions may enable more precise designs
of any measurements that may be performed by visiting spacecraft. Finally, the flyby-induced spin state
change may alter the asteroid’s Yarkovsky acceleration and subsequent Earth encounter predictions.
In this paper, we outline the current Apophis spin state estimates, propagate these states through the
flyby, present the resulting post-flyby spin state distributions, and finally discuss implications for Apophis’
flyby-induced geophysical evolution and the Yarkovsky effect.
2. Current Spin State Estimates
The Apophis spin state and shape model solutions provided by Pravec et al. (2014) and Brozovi´c et al.
(2018) are both considered in our analysis. From here on, these will be referred to as the “photometric” and
“radar” solutions respectively. Table 1 lists these solutions. Here, P¯
φsis the average precession period of the
asteroid’s maximum inertia (short) axis around the rotational angular momentum vector H(Samarasinha
and Mueller, 2015). This is the short axis period convention assumed in Pravec et al. (2014). Alternatively,
we can use the long axis convention where P¯
φlis the average precession period of the minumum inertia (long)
axis about H(Samarasinha and A’Hearn, 1991). Given Apophis’ elongated shape, it can be more intuitive
to track motion of the long axis. P¯
φlalso tends to have the largest associated amplitude in Apophis light
curves (Pravec et al., 2014). The other tumbling period, Pψ, is the rotation period about the short or long
axis in the corresponding convention. Since Pψis equal to the circulation period of the asteroid’s angular
3
velocity vector ωin the body-fixed frame, its value is the same for both short and long axis conventions
(Samarasinha and Mueller, 2015). A schematic of the tumbling periods for the long axis convention is shown
in Figure 1 where θis the time-varying nutation angle between the long axis and H.
Figure 1: Long axis tumbling period convention for Apophis
The three tumbling periods are related by the following equation (Samarasinha and Mueller, 2015),
1
P¯
φs
=1
P¯
φl
+1
Pψ
(1)
In Table 1, λand βare the J2000 ecliptic longitude and latitude of H. Finally, denoting the three
principal moments of inertia as IlIiIs, we provide the two inertia ratios Il/Isand Ii/Is. Uncertainties
in the photometric solution quantities are given to the 3σconfidence level. For the photometric solution,
the nominal λand βvalues are given while Pravec et al. (2014) provide the range of admissible rotational
angular momentum directions in Figure 4 of their paper. Throughout this work we refer to the angular
momentum direction as the “pole”. Due to the limited resolution of the 2012 - 2013 Apophis radar data
given the relatively large 0.1 AU encounter distance, Brozovi´c et al. (2018) were unable to improve on the
photometric solution uncertainties. So the radar solution is subject to similar uncertainties. See Brozovi´c
et al. (2018) and its supplemental material for more insight on the radar solution uncertainties.
4
摘要:

SpinStateEvolutionof(99942)Apophisduringits2029EarthEncounterConorJ.Benson,DanielJ.ScheeresUniversityofColoradoBoulder,3775DiscoveryDrive,Boulder,CO80303,USAMarinaBrozovic,StevenChesleyJetPropulsionLaboratory,CaliforniaInstituteofTechnology,4800OakGroveDrive,Pasadena,CA91109,USAPetrPravec,PetrSchei...

展开>> 收起<<
Spin State Evolution of 99942 Apophis during its 2029 Earth Encounter Conor J. Benson Daniel J. Scheeres University of Colorado Boulder 3775 Discovery Drive Boulder CO 80303 USA.pdf

共20页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!

相关推荐

分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:20 页 大小:3.8MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-03

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 20
客服
关注