
approximation with second-order approximation properties from an elementwise projection
on constants. For an overview on Clément quasi-interpolators we refer to the works [8, 6] and
for additional information and applications to [7]. As a side product of our analysis we obtain
a result on the approximation by piecewise constants in the dual space of H2(Ω) ∩H1
0(Ω)
(Corollary 13).
Our results on quasi-optimality in weaker norms might also be of interest for the analysis
of FOSLS for eigenvalue problems [1]. The authors of [21] define a superconvergent FEM
based on the postprocessing technique from [22]. Our new findings for the postprocessing
scheme (Section 4) could also improve the results from [21] for the lowest-order case.
In this article we only consider lowest-order discretizations, though, many results can be
extended to the higher-order case. E.g., for the FOSLS we refer the reader to the very recent
work [20, Remark 4.7]. We restrict the presentation to n= 2,3but note that our results
are valid for n= 1. The remainder of this work is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces
some notation and contains the statement and proofs of the quasi-optimality results stated
above. In Section 3 we study a weighted Clément quasi-interpolator and discuss some of its
main properties. Optimal error estimates for the postprocessed solution of (4) and optimal
L2(Ω) error estimates for the scalar solution of (5) are given in Section 4. This article closes
with various numerical experiments (Section 5).
2. Quasi-optimality
This section is devoted to the proof of quasi-optimality results of the modified variants (4)
and (5) of the mixed FEM and FOSLS claimed in the introduction. Before we give details in
Section 2.3 we recall some known properties of projection operators needed for the analysis
in Section 2.2. The proof of quasi-optimality requires a H−1(Ω) bounded projection operator
and we also give an example of such an operator that is easy to implement.
2.1. Sobolev spaces. For a Lipschitz domain K⊆Ωwe denote by Hk(K),Hk
0(K),k∈N
the usual Sobolev spaces with norms k · kK,k. If K= Ω we simply write k · kk. The
space H1
0(Ω) is equipped with the norm k·k1:= k∇(·)kwhere k·k is the L2(Ω) norm
with inner product (·,·). Similarly, k·kKis the L2(K)norm with inner product (·,·)K.
Intermediate Sobolev spaces with index sare defined by (real) interpolation, e.g., e
Hs(Ω) =
[L2(Ω), H1
0(Ω)]s,Hs(Ω) = [L2(Ω), H1(Ω)]swith norm denoted by k · ks. Dual spaces of
Sobolev spaces are understood with respect to the extended L2inner product, e.g, the dual
of H1
0(Ω) is denoted by H−1(Ω) and equipped with the dual norm
kφk−1= sup
06=v∈H1
0(Ω)
(φ, v)
kvk1
.
Note that H−s(Ω) = ( e
Hs(Ω))0with norms k·k−s,s∈(0,1).
2.2. Projection and interpolation operators. Let Tdenote a regular mesh of simplices
of Ωwith hT∈L∞(Ω) denoting the elementwise mesh-size function, hT|T= diam(T)for
T∈ T . With Vwe denote all vertices of Tand V0=V \ Γare the interior vertices. The set
of n+ 1 vertices of an element T∈ T is VT. The patch of all elements of Tsharing a node
z∈ V is denoted by ωzand Ωzis used for the domain associated to ωz. The element patch
ωTis the union of all vertex patches ωzwith z∈ VTand ΩTis the corresponding domain.
3