When the former occurs, the step is called an innovation, while in the latter case it is referred to as a
reinforcement. The process ( ˆ
S(n)
k) is called the step-reinforced version of (S(n)
k). It was shown in [7] that,
under appropriate assumptions on the memory parameter p, we have the following convergence in the
sense of finite dimensional distributions as the mesh-size tends to 0
(ˆ
S(n)
bntc)t∈[0,1]
f.d.d.
−→ ˆ
ξtt∈[0,1],(1.1)
towards a process ˆ
ξidentified in [7] and called a noise reinforced L´evy process. It should be noted that
the process ˆ
ξconstructed in [7] is a priori not even rcll, and this will be one of our first concerns.
We are now in position to briefly state the main results of this work. First, we shall prove the
existence of a rcll modification for ˆ
ξ. In particular, this allow us to consider the jump process (∆ˆ
ξs); a
proper understanding of its nature will be crucial for this work. In this direction, we introduce a new
family of random measures in R+×Rof independent interest under the name noise reinforced Poisson
point processes (abbreviated NRPPPs) and we study its basic properties. This lead us towards our first
main result, which is a version of the L´evy-Itˆo decomposition in the reinforced setting. More precisely,
we show that the jump measure of ˆ
ξis a NRPPP and that ˆ
ξcan be written as
ˆ
ξt=ˆ
ξ(1)
t+ˆ
ξ(2)
t+ˆ
ξ(3)
t, t ≥0,
where now, ˆ
ξ(1) = (at +qˆ
Bt:t≥0) for a continuous Gaussian process ˆ
B, the process ˆ
ξ(2) is a rein-
forced compound Poisson process with jump-sizes greater than one, while ˆ
ξ(3) is a purely discontinuous
semimartingale. The continuous Gaussian process ˆ
Bis the so-called noise reinforced Brownian motion,
a Gaussian process introduced in [8] with law singular with respect to B, and arising as the universal
scaling limit of noise reinforced random walks when the law of the typical step is in L2(P) – and hence
plays the role of Brownian motion in the reinforced setting, see also [4] for related results. Needless to
say that if the starting L´evy process ξis a Brownian motion, the limit ˆ
ξobtained in (1.1) is a noise
reinforced Brownian motion. As in the non-reinforced case, ˆ
ξ(2) and ˆ
ξ(3) can be recovered from the jump
measure ˆ
N, but in contrast, they are not Markovian. The terminology used for the jump measure of ˆ
ξ
is justified by the following remarkable property: for any Borel Awith Λ(A)<∞, the counting process
of jumps ∆ˆ
ξs∈Athat we denote by ˆ
NAis a reinforced Poisson process and, more precisely, it has the
law of the noise reinforced version of NA(hence, the terminology ˆ
NAis consistent). Moreover, for any
disjoint Borel sets A1, . . . , Akwith Λ(Ai)<∞, the corresponding ˆ
NA1,..., ˆ
NAkare independent noise
reinforced Poisson processes. Informally, the reinforcement induces memory on the jumps of ˆ
ξ, and these
are repeated at the jump times of an independent counting process. When working on the unit interval,
this counting process is the so-called Yule-Simon process.
The second main result of this work consists in defining pathwise, the noise reinforced version ˆ
ξof
the L´evy process ξ. We always denote such a pair by (ξ, ˆ
ξ). This is mainly achieved by transforming the
jump measure of ξinto a NRPPP, by a procedure that can be interpreted as the continuous time analogue
of the reinforcement algorithm we described for random walks. More precisely, the steps X(n)
kof the
n-skeleton are replaced by the jumps ∆ξsof the L´evy process; each jump of ξis shared with its reinforced
version ˆ
ξwith probability 1 −p, while with probability pit is discarded and remains independent of ˆ
ξ.
We then proceed to justify our construction by showing that the skeleton of ξand its reinforced version
(S(n)
bn·c,ˆ
S(n)
bn·c) converge weakly towards (ξ, ˆ
ξ), strengthening (1.1) considerably.
Section 6 is devoted to applications: on the one hand, in Section 6.1 we study the rates of growth at
the origin of ˆ
ξand prove that well know results established by Blumenthal and Getoor in [9] for L´evy
processes still hold for NRLPs. On the other hand, in Section 6.2 we analyse NRLPs under the scope
of infinitely divisible processes in the sense of [21]. We shall give a proper description of ˆ
ξin terms of
the usual terminology of infinitely divisible processes, as well as an application, by making use of the
so-called Isomorphism theorem for infinitely divisible processes.
Let us mention that in the discrete setting, reinforcement of processes and models has been subject of
active research for a long time, see for instance the survey by Pemantle [19] as well as e.g. [6, 3, 1, 18, 2, 11]
and references therein for related work. However, reinforcement of time-continuous stochastic processes,
which is the topic of this work, remains a rather unexplored subject.
The rest of the work is organised as follows: in Section 2 we recall the basic building blocs needed for
the construction of NRLPs and recall the main results that will be needed. Notably, we give a brief
overview of the features of the Yule-Simon process and present some important examples of NRLPs. In
Section 3 we show that a NRLP has a rcll modification. In Section 4 we construct NRPPPs, study their
2