1 An RNA Sequencing Analysis of Glaucoma Genesis in Mice

2025-04-28 0 0 1.25MB 6 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
1
An RNA Sequencing Analysis of Glaucoma
Genesis in Mice
Jai Sharma1and Vidhyacharan Bhaskar2,*
1Student Intern Researcher, Robinson Lab, Stanford University;
269 Campus Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94305; Email: jaisharmaus@gmail.com
2Professor, School of Engineering, San Francisco State University;
1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132
*Corresponding Author’s Email: vcharan@gmail.com
Abstract—Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blind-
ness in people over the age of 60, accounting for 6.6 to 8%
of all blindness in 2010, but there is still much to be learned
about the genetic origins of the eye disease. With the modern
development of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies,
scientists are starting to learn more about the genetic origins
of Glaucoma. This research uses differential expression (DE)
and gene ontology (GO) analyses to study the genetic differ-
ences between mice with severe Glaucoma and multiple control
groups. Optical nerve head (ONH) and retina data samples
of genome-wide RNA expression from NCBI (NIH) are used
for pairwise comparison experimentation. In addition, principal
component analysis (PCA) and dispersion visualization methods
are employed to perform quality control tests of the sequenced
data. Genes with skewed gene counts are also identified, as they
may be marker genes for a particular severity of Glaucoma.
The gene ontologies found in this experiment support existing
knowledge of Glaucoma genesis, providing confidence that the
results were valid. Future researchers can thoroughly study the
gene lists generated by the DE and GO analyses to find potential
activator or protector genes for Glaucoma in mice to develop drug
treatments or gene therapies to slow or stop the progression of
the disease. The overall goal is that in the future, such treatments
can be made for humans as well to improve the quality of life for
human patients with Glaucoma and reduce Glaucoma blindness
rates.
Index Terms—mRNA Sequence Data; Statistical Analysis;
Differential Expression Analysis; Gene Ontology Analysis; Glau-
coma; Ophthalmology
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
The neurodegenerative eye disease Glaucoma is a part of a
group of eye diseases which can cause blindness. Glaucoma
in particlar is one of the leading causes of blindness in people
over the age of 60 [1]. The most common type of Glaucoma,
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)1, is caused when
resistance in the Trabecular Meshwork leads to increased
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the eye. As a result, aqueous
humor, which supplies nutrients to the cornea, is unable to
flow from the Posterior Chamber to the Anterior Chamber,
through the Trabecular Meshwork, and back into the body.
1This paper will be discussing only Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, so
the terms “Glaucoma” and “Primary Open Angle Glaucoma” will be used
interchangeably unless otherwise specified.
In POAG, a gradual increase in IOP leads to damage to
the optic nerve and the chronic and irreversible onset of
Glaucoma. As POAG progresses, the IOP increase leads
to cupping of the optic disc; while the ratio between the
diameter of the optic cup to the diameter of the optic disc
is 0.5 in a normal eye, this ratio increases during cupping
in POAG [1]. Left untreated, Glaucoma takes on average 25
years to progress from normal vision to complete blindness.
Even with treatment, 9% to 19% of patients reach complete
blindness, implying a need for treatment improvements [2].
Glaucoma in general is characterized by the cupping
and atrophy of the optic nerve head, visual field loss of the
patient, and often the increased IOP [3]. Thapa, et al. studied
a subset of the Nepalese population and found that the
occurrence rate of Glaucoma was 1.9%. Approximately 68%
of these cases were Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, 22.67%
of these cases were Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma,
and 9.33% of these cases were secondary Glaucoma [4].
Casson, et al. highlighted that while Glaucoma used to be
characterized by high IOP, many cases of Glaucoma without
high IOP and high IOP without Glaucoma disputed this
assumption. Now, high IOP is simply considered a risk factor
rather than a defining feature, and reducing IOP is currently
the only treatment strategy for Glaucoma [5].
B. Risk Factors and Symptoms
It is known that old age, family history, Black ethnic
origin, and Myopia (nearsightedness) are all risk factors for
Glaucoma. Once a patient is diagnosed with Glaucoma, routine
screening by an optometrist is used to ensure the disease’s slow
progression. As POAG progresses, the patient experiences
a loss of peripheral vision (tunnel vision), fluctuating pain,
headaches, and blurred vision. Symptoms are usually worse at
nighttime or in dark spaces [1].
C. Current Diagnosis and Treatment Methods
While 111.8 million people are expected to have Glaucoma
by 2040, there is much to be learned about the genetic
origins and development of this disease. Glaucoma (all types
collectively) have a 10% diagnosis rate worldwide and less
arXiv:2210.01546v1 [q-bio.GN] 2 Oct 2022
2
than 50% diagnosis rate in developed nations [2].
Currently, there are several ways to diagnose Glaucoma.
First, Non-Contact Tonometry can be used to shoot puffs
of air and measure puff response from the cornea. A small
reaction to the puff of air would be associated with high
IOP, and an according Glaucoma diagnosis can be made.
This method is relatively less accurate, but it is a good
estimation for eye pressure. The industrial standard for
Glaucoma diagnosis is the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
method, which utilizes advanced equipment to make contact
with the cornea and apply different amounts of pressure
to find the IOP, from which a Glaucoma diagnosis can be
made. Other forms of diagnosis include Fundoscopy, which
can help examine the eye for cupping, and the Visual Field
Assessment Test, which tests for peripheral vision loss [1].
Glaucoma is asymptomatic until it reaches an advanced stage,
so it is recommended that patients undergo regular screening
examinations from age 40 onward. The rate of false positives
for Glaucoma diagnosis is high, so it is also recommended
that any positive finding is followed up with further testing [6].
The IOP for a normal eye ranges from 10 mmHg
to 21 mmHg, and treatment is often started when IOP
reaches 24 mmHg. Current treatments include Prostaglandin
Analogues (e.g. Latanoprost) which increase uveoscleral
outflow, Topical Beta-Blockers (e.g. Timolol) and Carbonic
Anhydrase Inhibitors (e.g. Dorzolamide) which reduce
the production of aqueous humor, and Sympathomimetics
(e.g. Brimonidine) which increase uveoscleral outflow and
reduce the production of aqueous humor. Surgical methods
of treatment include Trabeculectomy which creates a new
channel for aqueous humor to drain from the eye; however,
this procedure is risky and its effects are only temporary
[1]. Conlon, et al. analyzed trends in Glaucoma treatments,
concluding that there has been a recent increase in Glaucoma
medications and the use of laser trabeculoplasty over the past
decade. Additionally, there has been a noticable decrease in
the frequency of invasive incisional surgery. New methods
such as microinvasive Glaucoma surgery have also been
introduced [7]. Despite advances in laser and incisional
surgery, Schwartz, et al. claim that medical therapy is still the
primary method of treatment and that there is good evidence
that laser trabeculoplasty is just as good as initial medical
therapy [8].
D. Research Goal
Crucial to the development of new cures for POAG is
the more sophisticated understanding of the disease at the
genetic level. The goal of this research is to find the genes
responsible for the genesis of Glaucoma in mice so that
this information may be used to develop new treatments in
the future which target these genes or corresponding gene
pathways in mice. The overall goal is that future research can
develop new and more effective POAG treatments for humans.
This research is focused on generating candidate gene lists
which may contain potential activator or protector genes for
Glaucoma in mice. However, it should be noted that doing
intensive biological studies to study these gene lists manually
is outside the scope of this research.
Note that mice were used here because mice have
eyes which are similar to human eyes in that they develop
hereditary Glaucoma and high IOP, as will be explained in the
next section. This research and similar research on Glaucoma
have taken advantage of this unique property of mice.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Research has been conducted to explore the function
of ncRNA, transcriptional mRNA, and similar biological
molecules in Glaucoma, Cataracts, and different types of
cancers. This research has shown to successfully identify
targets for further therapeutic research to develop treatments
for the corresponding disease.
Chen, et al. explored time-series circRNA, lncRNA,
miRNA, and mRNA expression profiles of developing mice
retina samples. The aim of this research was to find the
key functional ncRNA and ceRNA which regulated retinal
neurogenesis. The research found that several ncRNAs in
the circRNA/lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network, including
circCDYL, circATXN1, circDYM, circPRGRIP, lncRNA
Meg3, and lncRNA Vax2os, involved neurotransmitter
transport and multicellular organism growth during retinal
development [13]. Zhou, et al. aimed to identify differing
biological mechanisms involved in each Glaucoma subtype.
Results from the research indicated that human participants
with high tension Glaucoma had an enrichment of genes
associated with unfolded protein response. Further, the
research identified the differential expression of genes in
certain IOP regulating tissues [2]. Howell, et al. used house
mice mRNA data set to investigate the genetic origins of
Glaucoma using temporally ordered sequences of Glaucoma
states. The overall goal was to identify molecular events
which can be targeted to provide effective new treatments
for human glaucoma. A major finding from this study was
that mice with a mutation in the C1QA gene were protected
from Glaucoma. Additionally, it was found that inhibition
of endothelin system with bosentan, an endothelin receptor
antagonist, was strongly protective against damage from
Glaucoma [14].
Current research methods perform genetic comparisons
between mice with Glaucoma and mice without Glaucoma,
but one of the drawbacks of this research is that it fails to
stratify these comparison based on specific features such
as age or strain. Thus, we lack insight into how these
features specifically contribute to or protect from Glaucoma.
The research presented in this paper intends to solve this issue.
This research focuses on finding potential activator
or protector genes for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in
house mice. This research is significant because one control
摘要:

1AnRNASequencingAnalysisofGlaucomaGenesisinMiceJaiSharma1andVidhyacharanBhaskar2,*1StudentInternResearcher,RobinsonLab,StanfordUniversity;269CampusDrive,PaloAlto,CA94305;Email:jaisharmaus@gmail.com2Professor,SchoolofEngineering,SanFranciscoStateUniversity;1600HollowayAvenue,SanFrancisco,CA94132*Corr...

展开>> 收起<<
1 An RNA Sequencing Analysis of Glaucoma Genesis in Mice.pdf

共6页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:6 页 大小:1.25MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-28

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 6
客服
关注