2
than 50% diagnosis rate in developed nations [2].
Currently, there are several ways to diagnose Glaucoma.
First, Non-Contact Tonometry can be used to shoot puffs
of air and measure puff response from the cornea. A small
reaction to the puff of air would be associated with high
IOP, and an according Glaucoma diagnosis can be made.
This method is relatively less accurate, but it is a good
estimation for eye pressure. The industrial standard for
Glaucoma diagnosis is the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
method, which utilizes advanced equipment to make contact
with the cornea and apply different amounts of pressure
to find the IOP, from which a Glaucoma diagnosis can be
made. Other forms of diagnosis include Fundoscopy, which
can help examine the eye for cupping, and the Visual Field
Assessment Test, which tests for peripheral vision loss [1].
Glaucoma is asymptomatic until it reaches an advanced stage,
so it is recommended that patients undergo regular screening
examinations from age 40 onward. The rate of false positives
for Glaucoma diagnosis is high, so it is also recommended
that any positive finding is followed up with further testing [6].
The IOP for a normal eye ranges from 10 mmHg
to 21 mmHg, and treatment is often started when IOP
reaches 24 mmHg. Current treatments include Prostaglandin
Analogues (e.g. Latanoprost) which increase uveoscleral
outflow, Topical Beta-Blockers (e.g. Timolol) and Carbonic
Anhydrase Inhibitors (e.g. Dorzolamide) which reduce
the production of aqueous humor, and Sympathomimetics
(e.g. Brimonidine) which increase uveoscleral outflow and
reduce the production of aqueous humor. Surgical methods
of treatment include Trabeculectomy which creates a new
channel for aqueous humor to drain from the eye; however,
this procedure is risky and its effects are only temporary
[1]. Conlon, et al. analyzed trends in Glaucoma treatments,
concluding that there has been a recent increase in Glaucoma
medications and the use of laser trabeculoplasty over the past
decade. Additionally, there has been a noticable decrease in
the frequency of invasive incisional surgery. New methods
such as microinvasive Glaucoma surgery have also been
introduced [7]. Despite advances in laser and incisional
surgery, Schwartz, et al. claim that medical therapy is still the
primary method of treatment and that there is good evidence
that laser trabeculoplasty is just as good as initial medical
therapy [8].
D. Research Goal
Crucial to the development of new cures for POAG is
the more sophisticated understanding of the disease at the
genetic level. The goal of this research is to find the genes
responsible for the genesis of Glaucoma in mice so that
this information may be used to develop new treatments in
the future which target these genes or corresponding gene
pathways in mice. The overall goal is that future research can
develop new and more effective POAG treatments for humans.
This research is focused on generating candidate gene lists
which may contain potential activator or protector genes for
Glaucoma in mice. However, it should be noted that doing
intensive biological studies to study these gene lists manually
is outside the scope of this research.
Note that mice were used here because mice have
eyes which are similar to human eyes in that they develop
hereditary Glaucoma and high IOP, as will be explained in the
next section. This research and similar research on Glaucoma
have taken advantage of this unique property of mice.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Research has been conducted to explore the function
of ncRNA, transcriptional mRNA, and similar biological
molecules in Glaucoma, Cataracts, and different types of
cancers. This research has shown to successfully identify
targets for further therapeutic research to develop treatments
for the corresponding disease.
Chen, et al. explored time-series circRNA, lncRNA,
miRNA, and mRNA expression profiles of developing mice
retina samples. The aim of this research was to find the
key functional ncRNA and ceRNA which regulated retinal
neurogenesis. The research found that several ncRNAs in
the circRNA/lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network, including
circCDYL, circATXN1, circDYM, circPRGRIP, lncRNA
Meg3, and lncRNA Vax2os, involved neurotransmitter
transport and multicellular organism growth during retinal
development [13]. Zhou, et al. aimed to identify differing
biological mechanisms involved in each Glaucoma subtype.
Results from the research indicated that human participants
with high tension Glaucoma had an enrichment of genes
associated with unfolded protein response. Further, the
research identified the differential expression of genes in
certain IOP regulating tissues [2]. Howell, et al. used house
mice mRNA data set to investigate the genetic origins of
Glaucoma using temporally ordered sequences of Glaucoma
states. The overall goal was to identify molecular events
which can be targeted to provide effective new treatments
for human glaucoma. A major finding from this study was
that mice with a mutation in the C1QA gene were protected
from Glaucoma. Additionally, it was found that inhibition
of endothelin system with bosentan, an endothelin receptor
antagonist, was strongly protective against damage from
Glaucoma [14].
Current research methods perform genetic comparisons
between mice with Glaucoma and mice without Glaucoma,
but one of the drawbacks of this research is that it fails to
stratify these comparison based on specific features such
as age or strain. Thus, we lack insight into how these
features specifically contribute to or protect from Glaucoma.
The research presented in this paper intends to solve this issue.
This research focuses on finding potential activator
or protector genes for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in
house mice. This research is significant because one control