Can the phase of radiation pressure uctuations be ipped in a single path for laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors Tomohiro Ishikawa1 Shoki Iwaguchi1 Bin Wu1 Izumi Watanabe1 Yuki Kawasaki1 Ryuma

2025-04-27 0 0 759.88KB 14 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Can the phase of radiation pressure fluctuations be flipped in a single
path for laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors?
Tomohiro Ishikawa1,, Shoki Iwaguchi1, Bin Wu1, Izumi Watanabe1, Yuki Kawasaki1, Ryuma
Shimizu1, Yutaro Enomoto2, Yuta Michimura3, Akira Furusawa2,4, and Seiji Kawamura1,5
1Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
2Department of Applied Physics, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1
Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
3Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
4Center for Quantum Computing, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
5The Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe,
NagoyaUniversity, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
Abstract
Radiation pressure (RP) noise, one component of quantum noise, can limit the sensitivity of laser
interferometric gravitational wave (GW) detectors at lower frequencies. We conceived a possible RP
noise cancellation method, using phase flipped ponderomotive-squeezed light (FPSL) incident on free-mass
mirrors in interferometers’ arms. This possibility is investigated under the constraint that the method is for
space-based GW detectors in a broad frequency band lower than 1 Hz without using a long optical cavity.
Considering various patterns in a single path small-scale case to generate the FPSL, we proved that no
configuration exists in the single path case.
Keywords: Gravitational waves, laser interferometer, quantum fluctuations, ponderomotive-squeezing
1 Introduction
Gravitational wave (GW) detection is one of the most important tools for current and future astronomy. Direct
observation of astronomical phenomena using GW is remarkably useful because we can investigate even objects
that do not emit electromagnetic waves as long as they move with acceleration. It enables us to observe
and investigate such celestial bodies and their phenomena experimentally, which have been explained only
theoretically. An opportunity revolutionizing the space research was the first detection of GWs by LIGO [1]
and Virgo [2]; in 2015, they detected the first black-hole binary merger event [3]. Two years later, they also
detected the first neutron-star binary merger event [4]. These events provided much information that was hard to
get with electromagnetic observations. At present, many countries plan more sophisticated GW detectors [5, 6].
In particular, detection in the low-frequency band is one of the key factors to develop further GW detectors
because not only the heavenly bodies but also various cosmological events are targeted at the frequencies. As
far as space GW detectors are concerned, there are LISA [7, 8], DECIGO [9, 10], BBO [11], and so on.
In interferometric GW detectors, laser light is used as a probe to sense GWs. It is because very small
distance fluctuations between two free masses, caused by GWs, can be measured as phase fluctuations of the
laser light. However, there is a fundamental noise preventing the detection of the GW signals in the laser light:
quantum noise [12]. It comes from quantum fluctuations of the laser light and/or the vacuum itself, and contains
two components: shot noise and radiation pressure (RP) noise. The shot noise is a sensor noise; fluctuations in
phase quadratures cause fluctuations of photon numbers at a photodetector. On the other hand, the RP noise
is displacement noise; it is generated when the laser light with amplitude fluctuations hits free-mass mirrors in
the interferometers. The linear spectral density for the shot noise, Sshot, and the RP noise, SRP, depend
on laser power P0and the GW frequency f, as Sshot 1/P0and SRP P0/f 2, respectively. From the
dependence of the two quantum noises, the GW detector sensitivity is more limited by the RP noise at the
lower frequency band especially when the power is increased.
1
arXiv:2210.02669v1 [gr-qc] 6 Oct 2022
One promising method of reducing the RP noise in a broad frequency band uses a filter cavity [13].
Ponderomotively-squeezed light generated in the interferometers is injected into the filter cavities, which can
modify the level and angle of the squeezed fluctuations in a frequency dependent way. When the modified
quantum fluctuations after the filter cavities are detected by the appropriate homodyne detection method, the
RP noise can vanish at all frequencies. This method requires filter cavities with a similar size as the arm
cavities. However, very long filter cavities could impair the squeezing quality [14, 15] due to optical diffraction
loss. Therefore, space detectors with long arm cavities such as DECIGO cannot use this method.
In this paper, we consider the possibility of another method: a phase flipped ponderomotive-squeezed light
(FPSL) incident on the arms. The FPSL is light in which only the sign of the RP fluctuations is opposite from
that of the conventional ponderomotive-squeezed light without the sign of the amplitude and phase fluctuations
inverting. Using this method for the ground-based detectors, the RP noise at the photodetector could be
completely canceled. In the space-based detectors such as DECIGO, the method of directly injecting the FPSL
to the main arm cavities does not work well due to the large optical diffraction loss. Fortunately, a further
improvement of sensitivity was suggested by implementing the quantum locking technique with the help of
sub-cavities inside the same satellite [16, 17]. The FPSL can be injected into these short sub-cavities which
have negligible optical diffraction loss. Therefore, the FPSL method could be useful for both ground- and
space-based detectors.
Some previous works have proposed unique configurations to provide the FPSL [18, 19, 20]. However,
these ideas cannot be applied to DECIGO or similar GW detectors. The techniques in [18, 19] require an
auxiliary cavity that is as long as the main cavity with a high finesse. The diffraction loss of a cavity as long
as DECIGO would greatly impair the squeezing effect of the FPSL. As for the scheme in [20], lowering the
resonant frequency of an atom spin to the GW observation frequency is technically challenging. To find a new
configuration providing the FPSL, we searched for a configuration in a single path under the condition that the
scale of the system that could produce the FPSL is much smaller than the wavelength corresponding to the GW
frequency. The single path is defined as a geometry that a laser path is not divided by a beam splitter (BS). It
means that the laser carrier does not contain vacuum fluctuations accompanied with the BS. Optical processes
for the configurations, which we covered, are listed as follows:
the conventional ponderomotive-squeezing caused by the reflection of the light on a free-mass mirror
including the possibility of non-normal incident angle,
frequency-independent squeezing with a nonlinear optical medium,
the amplification (or reduction) of the laser amplitude inside an optical cavity, and
all combinations of the above.
In this paper, we mathematically provide an answer to the question, “Can the phase of radiation pressure
fluctuations be flipped in a single path for laser interferometric gravitational waves detectors?”
This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we explain the RP noise-canceling strategy, using the FPSL
incident on the interferometer. As a prelude to this description, we discuss the input-output relation of
conventional ponderomotive-squeezing. In Sec. 3, we define a notation of phase fluctuations coming from
the RP, which will be used in Sec. 4. Also, we discuss an input-output relation for two other optical processes:
frequency-independent squeezing with an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) and changes in the laser effective
amplitude in optical cavities or due to non-normal incident angles. In Sec. 4, we show step by step that we
cannot create the FPSL in the single path case. And finally, in Sec. 5, we discuss in more detail the reason why
no configuration exists by a case using an optical cavity.
2 Radiation pressure noise-canceling strategy with phase flipped
ponderomotive-squeezed light
In this section, we explain the core strategy in the paper: the RP noise-canceling strategy using the FPSL. Before
considering it, we review the case where conventional vacuum fluctuations are incident from an interferometers’
dark port.
2
2.1 Quantum fluctuations and GW signals at the dark port using the conventional
vacuum fluctuations as input
We consider a Michelson type laser interferometer, whose fringe at the anti-symmetric port is set as completely
dark, as shown in Fig. 1. In this geometry, the quantum fluctuations at the photodetector are obtained only from
the fluctuations incident to the interferometer from the dark port: vacuum fluctuations. We ignore quantum
fluctuations inherent in the laser light, and only discuss a relation between the vacuum fluctuations before
incident to the interferometer, (ˆx, ˆp), and the fluctuations returned from the interferometer, (ˆx0,ˆp0).
Free-mass mirror
Source
Photodetector
Free-mass mirror
!𝑥, !𝑝 !𝑥!, !𝑝!
!𝑥"#, !𝑝"#
!𝑥$%&, !𝑝$%&
Figure 1: Schematic geometry of a Michelson laser interferometer, showing the notations of quantum fluctuations
in some parts of the interferometer. The operators (ˆx, ˆp) and (ˆx0,ˆp0) represent the amplitude and phase
components of the vacuum fluctuations injected into the interferometer and reflected from the interferometer
at the BS along the dark port. The operators (ˆxin,ˆpin) and (ˆxout,ˆpout) show the fluctuations that leave the BS
and head for the BS inside the arm of the interferometer.
When the laser light enters the interferometer, the vacuum fluctuations from the dark port combine with
the laser light at the BS, with opposite signs on the two arms; thus, laser light in each arm of the interferometer
contains the vacuum fluctuations (ˆx, ˆp). Here we describe the fluctuations in each interferometer arm as the
one-sided electric field operator:
ˆ
E+(z, t) = r2π~ω0
Aceiω0(tz/c)Z
0hˆa+eiΩ(tz/c)+ ˆae+iΩ(tz/c)idΩ
2π,(1)
where ω0is the carrier frequency, Ω (ω0) is the measurement frequency, and Ais an effective cross-sectional
area [13]. Also ˆa+,ˆaare annihilation operators and defined using ω0,Ω:
ˆa+ˆaω0+Ω,ˆaˆaω0.(2)
These two annihilation operators ˆa±do not represent the amplitude and phase quadratures of the vacuum
fluctuations directly; thus, we define operators ˆxin, ˆpin as follows:
ˆxin 1
2ˆa++ ˆa
,ˆpin ≡ − i
2ˆa+ˆa
.(3)
Also, we can define the time-varying operators ˆxin(t),ˆpin(t) by taking the Fourier transform of ˆxin,ˆpin in Eq. (3):
ˆxin(z, t) = Z
0
dΩ
2πˆxineiΩ(tz/c)+ ˆx
ineiΩ(tz/c),
ˆpin(z, t) = Z
0
dΩ
2πˆpineiΩ(tz/c)+ ˆp
ineiΩ(tz/c).
(4)
3
摘要:

Canthephaseofradiationpressureuctuationsbeippedinasinglepathforlaserinterferometricgravitationalwavedetectors?TomohiroIshikawa1,„,ShokiIwaguchi1,BinWu1,IzumiWatanabe1,YukiKawasaki1,RyumaShimizu1,YutaroEnomoto2,YutaMichimura3,AkiraFurusawa2,4,andSeijiKawamura1,51DepartmentofPhysics,NagoyaUniversity,N...

展开>> 收起<<
Can the phase of radiation pressure uctuations be ipped in a single path for laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors Tomohiro Ishikawa1 Shoki Iwaguchi1 Bin Wu1 Izumi Watanabe1 Yuki Kawasaki1 Ryuma.pdf

共14页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:14 页 大小:759.88KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-27

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 14
客服
关注