
1 INTRODUCTION
1 Introduction
Quantum computers work fundamentally different than classical computers. By leveraging the
laws of quantum mechanics, they promise significant speed-ups for certain problems. The areas of
potential applications are versatile and include i.a. cryptography, machine learning and simulation.
This opens up several possibilities for the insurance industry to benefit from the new technology.
Broadly speaking, quantum computers can help solving computationally intensive problems. When
asking an actuary for a common task with high computational requirements, the valuation of in-
surance contracts is an obvious answer. The most expensive simulation concerns the liabilities of
life and health companies with very long time horizons (40 years and beyond), complex contractual
and legal frameworks, sophisticated customer behavior and interactions with assets (e.g. through
profit participation). Due to the complexity of these ”instruments”, closed-form valuation is not
available and hence Monte Carlo (MC) methods are widely used. But the fact is, that the valuation
of liabilities is essential for many subsequent tasks like calculation of economic capital, stress test
exercises or optimization of strategic asset allocations. Unfortunately, in many cases the current
technical capabilities do not allow full nested simulations. If we for example consider economic
capital, the full probability distribution of profits and losses is needed and hence MC simulations
”within” MC simulations are necessary. Actually that often means that at least 10’000 so called
outer scenarios and additionally not less than 1’000 inner scenarios for each outer are needed. Hence
we easily reach millions of simulations with long time horizons.
In practice there are different approaches to reduce the total number of inner scenarios, in particular
replicating portfolios [2] and least square Monte Carlo [1]. In both approaches a reduced number
of simulations is processes and an ”easy-to-valuate-proxy” is fit to the calculated information. The
obvious drawbacks are (1) potential inaccuracies especially in extreme scenarios (which are often
the most interesting ones), (2) additional work to generate the proxy and (3) additional effort to
analyze the discrepancies. If quantum computing would speed-up the simulation of inner scenarios
so that these proxies become obsolete, the impact on life and health insurers would be enormous:
Besides reducing the effort due to the above-mentioned drawbacks, increasing calculation frequency
could open the door to much more dynamic steering strategies. Import indicators like the Solvency
2 coverage ratio are for example currently calculated only a few times a year and consequently it
is hard to use it for dynamic hedging or optimization purposes.
Recently published quantum algorithms promise a quadratic speed-up for Monte Carlo valuations
of plain vanilla European options [21], basket options [23] as well as path-depended options like
Asian [21] or Barrier options [23]. I.e. the convergence rate increases from 1/√Mto 1/M where
Mis the number of samples. The underlying idea is Amplitude Estimation [3], where the target
quantity is first encoded to a quantum circuit which is then manipulated so that a subsequent
measurement delivers the desired result with high probability. Despite these promising results,
the implementation of a realistic insurance model on a real hardware quantum computer cannot
be expected in the upcoming years. Both hardware and software development are still in their
infancy and many theoretical results can only be executed in their most basic version. On the
other hand the development progresses and with the launch of IBM’s Q System One in Germany
another milestone was reached in June 2021.
In this documentation, we concentrate on quantum software development in a circuit model. In
particular we implement a payoff representing a whole life insurance and a second one simulating
3