file:///F|/rah/Fred%20Saberhagen/Saberhagen,%20Fred%20-%20Empire%20Of%20The%20East%20Trilogy%20[v1].txt
INTRODUCTION
Images vivid and simple, easy to see, and clearly impossible; images that stick in the mind. My
mind has watched the battle between Zapranoth and Lord Draffut, while toy armies of men stopped
their own battle to watch, and I won't forget any of it.
Prologue by Roger Zelazny
Fred Saberhagen does not look like the father of the berserkers, Count Dracula's amanuensis or an
authority on Inca tortures. These items do occasionally come to mind when his name is mentioned,
however, because they are the sorts of things which fix themselves readily in memory. So, I wish
to counter any image of a latter-day H. P. Lovecraft by remarking, for openers, that Fred is a
genial, witty, well-informed individual, with a wonderful wife named Joan, who is a mathematician,
and the three best-behaved children I've ever met: Jill, Eric and Tom. He likes good food and
drink and conversation. His working habits seem superior to my own, and his facility with
scholarly matters may even pre-date his one-time employment as a writer for The Encyclopaedia
Britannica.
I liked Fred's writing before I ever met him, and now that we are almost neighbors, I am pleased
to know him. I am just returned from a trip, and I finished reading his novel The Mask of the Sun
on the airplane. It made me feel that he could do no wrong. It has one of the most suspenseful
openings I have encountered in a long while, leading steadily and carefully into a truly exotic
setting and story-situation. His management of the paradoxes it involves is an exercise in
precision and symmetry. (I might as well add "colorful imagery and characterization," and for that
matter "scholarship which does not impede but enhances.") And having recently read his The Holmes-
Dracula File, I was still fresh on it for purposes of contrast and comparison. There, I was
impressed by the apparent ease with which the chapters (alternately narrated by the count himself
and by John Watson, M.D.) were recorded in appropriately individual styles, by the authentic
feeling of his Victorian London and by the sinuosities of the plot. It was very different from The
Mask of the Sun, but was written with equivalent skill, care and attention to detail.
All of which, upon reflection, is a way of saying that he is a versatile writer. But there is more
to Fred's stuff than mere technique. Sit down and read ten pages of anything he has written, and
you begin to see that he has given it a lot of thought. It hangs together. (I'm tired of the word
"organic" in reference to literature. It makes me think of a book with fungus growing on it.
Fred's books lack fungus but are of a whole piece - press one anywhere, and the entire story
fabric responds uniformly to the tension, seamlessly - because he has passed that way many times
and knows exactly why he situated every house, tree, black hole, berserker and idea just where he
did.) To see, to feel, to know the world you are assembling in such a consistent and fully
extended fashion has always seemed to me the mark of a superior writer. It lies beyond any surface
trickery - hooks, gimmicks, stylistic pyrotechnics - and is one of the things that makes the
difference between a memorable book and one that provides a few hours' entertainment and is soon
forgotten.
I could simply end on that note and be telling nothing less than the truth - after announcing that
here is another one, to enjoy, to remember - and then get out of your way and let you read it. But
life is short, good writers are a minority group and opportunities to talk about them are few,
unless you are a critic or a reviewer, neither of which hats fit me. And there is another thing
about writing and Fred which seems worth saying here. Raymond Chandler once observed that there
are plot writers, such as, say, Agatha Christie, who work everything out in advance, and then
there are others, such as himself, who do not know everything that is going to occur in a story
beforehand, who enjoy leaving leeway for improvisation and discovery as they go along. I've
written things both ways myself, but I prefer Chandler's route because there is a certain joy in
encountering the unexpected as you work. I've compared notes on this with Fred, and he is also of
the Chandler school. If this tells you nothing else in terms of the psychology behind some
people's creations, it at least lets you know which writers are probably having the most fun. And
this is important. There are days when such a writer curses the free-form muse but the
reconciliations are wonderful, and the work seldom seems a mere chore. It is good to know that
file:///F|/rah/Fred%20Saberhagen/Saberhagen,%2...0Empire%20Of%20The%20East%20Trilogy%20[v1].txt (3 of 243) [8/28/03 2:27:48 AM]