
3
0 250 500 750
n
0
1
0
1
g∗
n/g0∆n/∆0
0 10 20
∆Z/∆0
−1
0
1
E/∆0
0 250 500 750
n
0.0000
0.0025
0.0050
|Ψ|2
0 10 20
∆Z/∆0
−1
0
1
eV/∆0
−0.15
−0.10
−0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
GRL[e2/h]
(d)(c)
(b)(a)
FIG. 2. Formation of the Andreev band: (a) Spatial profiles
of the induced superconducting gap and of the g-factor at
zero Zeeman field in terms of their maximal zero-field values
∆0and g0, respectively. The combination of the two pro-
files leads to the formation of an Andreev band inside the
superconducting gap. (b) Energy spectrum of the Rashba
nanowire, with Andreev band, as a function of Zeeman field.
(c) Probability densities of the extended trivial Andreev states
at the positions marked by the colored squares in panel (b).
Gray dashed vertical lines indicate the position of the nor-
mal sections. Due to the hybridization of ABSs that form
in the normal sections, the Andreev states extend through-
out the nanowire. (d) Non-local differential conductance
GRL as a function of Zeeman field. Parameters: a= 4
nm; (NL=NR=NB,L =NB,R , NS, NN) = (5,150,10);
M= 6; (tL=tR=tSN , µL=µR=µSN ,∆0,∆c
Z, αL=
αR, γL=γR, µLead,L =µLead,R)≈(158,3,0.6,12.2,0,5,5)
meV; T= 0. See also SM [66].
port consequences of the delocalized states in the An-
dreev band, we first consider a profile with periodically
distributed variations in the induced proximity gap and
g-factor along the nanowire, as shown in Fig. 2(a). ABSs
are created as a result of this profile and have the ma-
jority of their weight in the periodic normal sections.
Further, these ABSs hybridize to form highly extended
states, as shown by the probability densities in Fig. 2(c).
We note that, even though we do not consider zero-energy
exterior ABSs here, short exterior normal sections are
present in the model to provide tunnel barriers for the
differential conductance computation, which we perform
with the Python package Kwant [72].
Due to the variation in the g-factor between the nor-
mal and superconducting sections, the energies of states
which form the Andreev band have a different slope as
a function of Zeeman field than states with the major-
ity of their weight in the superconducting sections, as
shown in Fig. 2(b). Here, the Zeeman field is defined
as ∆Z=g0µBB/2, where µBis the Bohr magneton, B
the magnetic field, and g0is the g-factor in the normal
sections. Importantly, the larger g-factor in the normal
sections means that the Andreev band states cross zero
energy considerably before the closing of the bulk super-
conducting gap and therefore mimic a topological BRS
in the energy spectrum. We note that for our model, the
slope of the energies as a function of the Zeeman field is
non-linear since we consider the superconducting gap to
be a function of the Zeeman field and, in addition, the
states leak into the regions with reduced g-factor, which
means that the average Zeeman field experienced by the
ABSs is reduced.
The non-local conductance only measures states that
connect left and right leads and, as shown in Fig. 2(d),
the extended nature of the states that form the Andreev
band means that it is visible in the non-local conduc-
tance. Therefore, the crossing of these states within the
bulk superconducting gap mimics the bulk gap closing
and reopening in non-local conductance, even though, by
design, the system remains entirely trivial for all Zeeman
fields.
Combination of trivial effects: We now combine the
trivial BRS due to an Andreev band with trivial ZBPs
due to exterior ABSs at the ends of the nanowire, such
zero-energy ABSs have previously been shown to be
abundant in Rashba nanowires [20–31, 33–35, 37, 38].
Together, these trivial features mimic the key trans-
port signatures of the topological gap protocol, namely,
the exterior ABSs result in ZBPs on either end of the
nanowire and the Andreev band results in a trivial BRS.
To generate the ZBPs we tune the system to a certain
resonance condition for SOI strength and the length of
the normal sections, in order to pin the exterior ABSs to
zero energy, see Refs. [25, 37] for more details. However,
the particular mechanism causing ZBPs at the ends of
the nanowire is not the main subject of this paper and
this mechanism can be exchanged for any other that re-
sults in ZBPs, as long as the formation of the Andreev
band is not affected. As previously, we set the Rashba
SOI strength to zero in the superconducting sections of
the nanowire which ensures the system is always in the
trivial phase. In fact, the Rashba SOI is in our model
only non-zero in the normal sections at the ends of the
system to provide a control knob in the simulation for
the zero-energy pinning of the exterior ABSs.
In Fig. 3(a) we show the energy spectrum of a system
which combines the trivial BRS due to the Andreev band
and trivial states with almost zero energy, as described
above. Here, we tune the right exterior ABS slightly
away from zero energy, in order to show that the exterior
ABSs are independent of each other. In addition to the
spectrum, we also calculate the topological visibility Q
[73, 74], which is positive over the majority of the range
of Zeeman field strengths, which is expected since our
system is always in the trivial phase, see Fig. 3(b). We
note, however, that if states of the Andreev band crosses
zero energy, then the unitary property of the reflection
matrix breaks down, due to the additional non-local pro-
cesses, see the SM [66].
Finally, the differential conductance matrix elements
are shown in Figs. 3(c)-3(f). We note that the ZBPs,