PREFACE
What man needs is not philosophy or religion in the academic or formalistic sense of the
term, but ability to think rightly. The malady of the age is not absence of philosophy or even
irreligion but wrong thinking and a vanity which passes for knowledge. Though it is difficult to
define right thinking, it cannot be denied that it is the goal of the aspirations of everyone. It is not
that anyone would deliberately wish to think wrongly, and wrong thinking, is that attitude of the
mind, where the false is mistaken for the true. This is a deep-rooted prejudice which it is hard for
most people to eradicate. Error has become so much a part of man’s thinking that there seems to be
no one in position to point it out. One cannot, at the same time, be a judge and also a party
summoned for examination. It is necessary that some effort has to be put forth in tackling the
problem in its core.
There is often a complaint that today the world has lost all philosophical or religious
consciousness and that there is no receptivity to higher values. In this connection it is always
forgotten that the higher values do not suddenly fall from the skies and they have to be inculcated
into the mind with some care. It is impossible that consciousness can reject truth, for the two are
inseparably related to each other, and, in their highest states, the two are one. What is needed is the
presentation of truth in a proper form, fitted to the particular stage in which human consciousness
finds itself. What is said should be neither too much nor too little, but suitably adapted to a given
situation of the human mind.
This means that the educational method varies for the different levels and, though the same
truth can be taught to all, it cannot be taught to everyone in the same way. Methods of instruction
differ, though the truth does not vary. Our present-day education has become a failure because of
the wrong methods adopted in stuffing the student’s mind with information that cannot be easily
digested. Education is not accumulation of information but assimilation of reality by degrees. When
educationists forget this fundamental truth behind the educational process, education becomes a
travesty and life a meaningless adventure. This is exactly the condition in which most people find
themselves to day and there cannot be remedy unless a vigorous attempt is made to come face to
face with the main point in question.
There is also a complaint that life is very busy and there is no time for philosophy or
religion. But philosophy and religion are not activities which require time,—they are not works to
be done but identical with right thinking, which does not require of one time. Just as one does not
require time to exist, though time may be needed for doing something, the question of lack of time
does not arise in the case of an effort to think rightly. It is like maintenance of health, which is more
a natural condition to be aspired for than a business to be dealt with or executed.
Teachers of philosophy and religion have been persistently making the mistake of suddenly
commencing to teach the outer forms rather than the essence of this knowledge. What the students
require to be told in the beginning is not Plato, Kant or Sankara; Hinduism, Buddhism, or
Christianity, but the rationality behind the structure of existence and life as a whole, a systematic
envisagement of the actual facts of life in their completeness and their ultimateness, so that the real
problem before us is faced both inwardly and outwardly, at a single grasp. It may be called, if we
would so like it, the philosophy and psychology of religion, understood in its proper sense, and not
v