the guiding needs of some intelligence.
Non-directed evolution is what we generally study—the slow changes that take
place in the Universe, in individual stars, in the planet we live on.
Yet, if we consider the daily lives of human beings, surely directed evolution
is the more important. Over the four or five million years of hominid
evolution, human beings have learned to make stone tools, use fire, develop
herding and agriculture, form pottery, invent metallurgical techniques, and
guide technology in multifarious directions. Over the last two and a quarter
centuries we have industrialized the world, and now we have at our disposal
such things as computers and spaceships. In addition, we have developed
cultural as well as technological techniques—and have created literature, art,
and philosophy.
All this has not been in blind and direct obedience to the laws of nature. We
are controlled by those laws, yes, and we have limits set for us by them.
Within those laws, however, humanity and its ancestors have made advances
directed by their own intelligent responses to the needs of life.
You can see the evolutionary nature of human technology if you imagine a
display of all the mechanical devices intended for transportation that have
been produced by humanity—starting with the wheeled carts of the Sumerians
right down to the rocket ships of today.
If you were to study a vast array of these devices carefully arranged in the
direction of increasing complexity and efficiency and allowed to branch off in
different directions—land vehicles, water vehicles, air vehicles, those
dragged by human beings, those dragged by animals, those powered by wind or
water, those powered by engines of various shapes—what would your conclusions
be?
If you were a disembodied intelligence from elsewhere, who did not know those
devices were human-made, you might suppose that some non-directed evolutionary
process had taken place; that somehow there was an inherent drive in
transportation devices that would lead them to fill various technological
niches and to do so with increasing specialization and expertise. You would
study ancestral forms, and note how aircraft developed from landcraft, for
instance, and find intermediate forms. Or if, in some cases, you found no
intermediate forms, you would blame it on the incompleteness of the record.
You would devise all sorts of technological forces (other than intelligence)
that would account for the changes you see.
But then, when you were all finished and had a complete theory of
technological evolution, someone might tell you, “No, no, you are dealing with
directed evolution. All these objects were created by human intelligence. All
these changes are the result of human experience learning bit by bit to
manufacture devices that more efficiently take care of human needs.”
That might make you think that scientists may have misinterpreted the records
of biological evolution in the same way. We have a vast array of fossils
representing ancient and now-extinct forms of life. We arrange them in such a
way as to show a steady change from simpler to more complex forms, from lesser
to greater variety, from those less like us to those more like us, and from it
all we induce a theory of non-directed biological evolution that involves
forces acting in blind response to the laws of nature.
But can we now say that, as in the case of transportation devices, we were
fooled? Can we imagine the history of life on Earth to be a case of directed
evolution with intelligence (call it “God”) behind every one of the changes?
No, there is a fundamental difference. In the case of technological evolution,
every device, every single device, is human-made. No technological device (of
the kind we have had hitherto) can make others like itself. If human beings
withheld their hands and brains, therefore, technological evolution would stop
at once.
In the case of biological evolution, each device (if we can use the term for a