
The temperature-dependence of carrier mobility is not a reliable indicator of the
dominant scattering mechanism
Alex M. Ganose,1, 2, ∗Junsoo Park,1and Anubhav Jain1, †
1Energy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
2Department of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub,
White City Campus, Imperial College London, Wood Lane, London, UK
(Dated: October 5, 2022)
The temperature dependence of experimental charge carrier mobility is commonly used as a
predictor of the dominant carrier scattering mechanism in semiconductors, particularly in thermo-
electric applications. In this work, we critically evaluate whether this practice is well founded. A
review of 47 state-of-the-art mobility calculations reveals no correlation between the major scatter-
ing mechanism and the temperature trend of mobility. Instead, we demonstrate that the phonon
frequencies are the prevailing driving forces behind the temperature dependence and can cause it
to vary between T−1to T−3even for an idealised material. To demonstrate this, we calculate
the mobility of 23,000 materials and review their temperature dependence, including separating
the contributions from deformation, polar, and impurity scattering mechanisms. We conclusively
demonstrate that a temperature dependence of T−1.5is not a reliable indicator of deformation po-
tential scattering. Our work highlights the potential pitfalls of predicting the major scattering type
based on the experimental mobility temperature trend alone.
Ever since the first theories of semiconductors were
developed, the temperature dependence of mobility has
been used to understand the quantum behaviour of ma-
terials. In 1931, Wilson derived expressions for charge
transport in semiconductors under the assumption that
lattice vibrations were the major cause of the electronic
resistivity [1,2]. His work proved highly successful at pre-
dicting the temperature dependence of mobility in n-type
germanium and lay the foundation for the modern theory
of band conduction in semiconductors [3,4]. The temper-
ature dependence of experimentally measured Hall mobil-
ity is now commonly used as a predictor of the dominant
scattering mechanism in thermoelectric materials [5–7].
Knowledge of the dominant scattering mechanism is of-
ten employed to fit models of charge transport including
deformation potentials and effective masses, and to ob-
tain estimates of the optimal doping concentration and
temperatures that maximise thermoelectric performance
[8–12].
Wilson’s 1931 paper demonstrated that the mobility of
a system dominated by acoustic lattice scattering should
exhibit a µ∝T−1.5dependence [2,3,13]. The same tem-
perature dependence was later demonstrated for optical
lattice scattering at high temperatures [14,15]. Since
then, a temperature dependence of µ∝T−1.5has widely
been considered an experimental signature of deforma-
tion potential scattering. Temperature trends ranging
from µ∝T−0.50–T−0.75 are thought to indicate scatter-
ing due to polar optical phonons [16–18], and even more
positive coefficients are ascribed to piezoelectric (T−0.5),
alloy (T−0.5), and impurity (T1.5) scattering [19–21]. In
all of these cases, the expected temperature trends are de-
∗a.ganose@imperial.ac.uk
†ajain@lbl.gov
rived from highly-simplified models of electronic scatter-
ing in systems containing a single isotropic and parabolic
band and a single dispersion-less phonon frequency.
State-of-the-art approaches based on density func-
tional perturbation theory combined with Wannier inter-
polation (DFPT+Wannier) can now calculate the trans-
port properties of semiconductors with predictive accu-
racy [22–24]. As the number of materials studied using
DFPT+Wannier has grown — at the time of writing this
includes over 100 bulk and two-dimensional compounds
— an unexpected trend has emerged. Many materials
that were thought to be limited by acoustic deforma-
tion potential scattering based on the temperature de-
pendence of mobility of µ∝T−1.5have instead been
shown to have strong contributions from polar optical
and other scattering mechanisms (Fig. 1) [25,26]. Ac-
cordingly, these latest computational results are challeng-
ing the commonly held assumption that the temperature
dependence of mobility is a reliable indicator of the un-
derlying scattering processes.
In this work, we critically evaluate whether the tem-
perature dependence of carrier mobility is a reliable in-
dicator the dominant scattering type. We review 47
DFPT+Wannier calculations that reveals no correlation
between the major scattering mechanism and the temper-
ature trend of mobility. Instead, we demonstrate that the
phonon frequencies are largely responsible for the tem-
perature dependence of mobility and can cause it to vary
between T−1to T−3even in a simple parabolic band
structure. Finally, we extract the temperature depen-
dence of mobility for acoustic deformation potential, po-
lar optical, and impurity scattering in over 23,000 ma-
terials that we have calculated using the recently devel-
oped amset software [27]. Our results demonstrate that
the temperature dependence of mobility should not be
used to determine the dominant scattering mechanism.
We conclude with the potential pitfalls of assuming the
arXiv:2210.01746v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 4 Oct 2022