The Key Factors Controlling the Seasonality of Planetary Climate

2025-05-06 0 0 1.32MB 11 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
1. Introduction
The seasonal cycle that a planet experiences is a function of a large number of parameters. A necessary condition
for a planet to experience a seasonal cycle is to have either non-zero obliquity or non-zero eccentricity, such that
the incoming solar radiation will have a seasonal cycle. The degree of seasonality, however, depends on other
parameters (e.g., Guendelman & Kaspi,2019,2020). The solar system's terrestrial planetary bodies, Earth, Mars,
and Titan, are great examples of planets with a similar obliquity, having a similarseasonal pattern of the incoming
solar radiation at the top of their atmosphere. Still, each planet experiences a different temperature seasonal cycle
at its surface (Figure1). This is a result of the different characteristics of these planets, especially, their radiative
timescale. The atmospheric radiative timescale can be estimated by (Mitchell & Lora,2016)
R=IR
4

3
,
(1)
where ξIR is the infrared optical depth, Cp is the specific heat at constant pressure, P is pressure, g is surface
gravity(with P/g is the atmospheric mass per unit area), σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and Te is the equilib-
rium temperature. To leading order the ratio between the radiative timescale and the orbital period should dictate
the strength of the seasonality that a planet will experience. For example, a planet with an orbital period that is
significantly longer than its radiative timescale, will experience a strong seasonal cycle, and vice versa (e.g.,
Guendelman & Kaspi,2019).
Earth has an atmospheric radiative timescale of ∼30days (Wells,2011). Additionally Earth's surface is mostly
covered by deep oceans resulting in high surface thermal inertia. The combination of high surface thermal inertia
and long atmospheric radiative timescale contribute to the strong modulation of Earth's seasonal cycle. Mars, on
the other hand has a dry rocky surface with low thermal inertia and a thin atmosphere (e.g., Read etal.,2015).
Abstract Several different factors influence the seasonal cycle of a planet. This study uses a general
circulation model and an energy balance model (EBM) to assess the parameters that govern the seasonal cycle.
We define two metrics to describe the seasonal cycle, ϕs, the latitudinal shift of the maximum temperature,
and ΔT, the maximum seasonal temperature variation amplitude. We show that alongside the expected
dependence on the obliquity and orbital period, where seasonality generally strengthens with an increase in
these parameters, the seasonality depends in a nontrivial way on the rotation rate. While the seasonal amplitude
decreases as the rotation rate slows down, the latitudinal shift, ϕs, shifts poleward. A similar result occurs in a
diffusive EBM with increasing diffusivity. These results suggest that the influence of the rotation rate on the
seasonal cycle stemsfrom the effect of the rotation rate on the atmospheric heat transport.
Plain Language Summary The seasonal cycle that a planet undergoes can be described by its
amplitude, that is, the maximal temperature difference experienced across the year. In addition, it can be
characterized by the latitudinal shift of the maximum temperature during that annual cycle. This study explores
the role of obliquity, orbital period, and rotation rate on the seasonality. We find that, as expected, increasing
the obliquity and orbital period results in a stronger seasonal cycle. Surprisingly, decreasing the rotation rate
has a complex effect on the seasonal cycle. It reduces the seasonal cycle amplitude but increases the latitudinal
shift of the maximum temperature. We find that this is a result of the effect of the rotation rate on the way
heat is redistributed within the atmosphere. These results emphasize the importance of studying the climate's
dependence on planetary parameters, as for example, an Earth-like planet with a slower rotation rate will
experience a significantly different seasonal cycle.
GUENDELMAN AND KASPI
© 2022. The Authors.
This is an open access article under
the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits use,
distribution and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
The Key Factors Controlling the Seasonality of Planetary
Climate
Ilai Guendelman1 and Yohai Kaspi1
1Earth and Planetary Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Key Points:
The seasonal cycle temperature
dependence on atmospheric and
orbital parameters is studied in an
idealized general circulation model
(GCM)
The majority of the GCM temperature
seasonal dependence on obliquity,
orbital period, and rotation rate is
captured in a diffusive energy balance
model
The maximum surface temperature
drifts poleward with decreasing
rotation rate due to a more efficient
atmospheric heat transport
Supporting Information:
Supporting Information may be found in
the online version of this article.
Correspondence to:
I. Guendelman,
ilai.guendelman@weizmann.ac.il
Citation:
Guendelman, I., & Kaspi, Y. (2022). The
key factors controlling the seasonality
of planetary climate. AGU Advances,
3, e2022AV000684. https://doi.
org/10.1029/2022AV000684
Received 23 FEB 2022
Accepted 19 AUG 2022
Peer Review The peer review history for
this article is available as a PDF in the
Supporting Information.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: Ilai Guendelman,
Yohai Kaspi
Formal analysis: Ilai Guendelman
Methodology: Ilai Guendelman
Supervision: Yohai Kaspi
Writing – original draft: Ilai
Guendelman
Writing – review & editing: Yohai Kaspi
10.1029/2022AV000684
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1 of 11
AGU Advances
GUENDELMAN AND KASPI
10.1029/2022AV000684
2 of 11
With an atmospheric radiative timescale of ∼1day (Wells,2011), it features the strongest seasonal cycle among
the three. In addition, Mars's eccentric orbit results in an hemispheric asymmetry between the southern and north-
ern summer solstices (Figure1). Titan, conversely, has a thick, cold atmosphere, that is, a long radiative timescale
(∼200years, Mitchell & Lora,2016), that also absorbs significant amounts of the shortwave radiation. All these
factors modulate its seasonal cycle. However, it has a very low surface thermal inertia, which acts to increase
the seasonal cycle. The competition between these two effects results in Titan having a moderate seasonal cycle.
Another importantparameter that differs among the three planets is the rotation rate, with Earth and Mars being
fast rotating planets and Titan being a slowly rotating planet (with a rotation period of ∼16 Earth days). Previ-
ous studies have shown that the atmospheric heat transport (AHT) on slowly rotating planets is more efficient,
resulting in flatter temperature gradients (Edson etal.,2011; Kaspi & Showman,2015; Liu etal.,2017; Merlis &
Schneider,2010; Noda etal.,2017; Pierrehumbert & Hammond,2019). This in turn has the potential to change
the seasonal cycle that a planet experiences (Tan,2022).
The obliquity of the giant planets, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus, too, is significantly larger than zero. When
considering their long atmospheric radiative timescale, most studies agree that these planets should experience
weak-to-no seasonal cycle (e.g., Conrath etal.,1990). However, Li etal.(2018) have estimated a shorter radia-
tive timescale for the ice giants, suggesting that both Uranus and Neptune should experience some seasonality.
At least for Uranus, where the dynamics extends deep (Kaspi etal., 2013) this is in contrast to what current
observations suggest (Orton etal.,2015; Roman etal.,2020). An opposite example of a mismatch between the
observed and expected seasonality is Titan. The cold conditions and massive atmosphere of Titan result in an
atmospheric radiative timescale that is much longer than its orbital period (Mitchell & Lora,2016). However,
the seasonal cycle on Titan is not negligible, and in some aspects stronger than that of Earth (Figure1). Mitchell
and Lora(2016) have suggested that the strength of the seasonal cycle is forced from Titan's low surface thermal
inertia. Shortwave radiation warms the surface, which in turn radiates back to the atmospheric boundary layer
that has a shorter radiative timescale compared to the entire atmosphere, allowing the seasonal cycle to become
significant. Although this can explain the seasonality on Titan, in this study,we also explore the role of the rota-
tion rate and AHT on the seasonal cycle.
This diversity in the seasonality of the solar system planets is tiny compared to the potential variety among
planets outside the solar system. Even if remainingrestricted to terrestrial planets within the habitable zone of
their host star, the possible diversity is immense. For example, differences between ocean and rocky worlds,
planets with different obliquities, eccentricities, or atmospheric compositions that would affect both the short-and
long-wave optical depths, all these have an effect on the climate seasonality that a planet will experience (e.g.,
Armstrong etal.,2014; Colose etal.,2019; Guendelman etal.,2021,2022; Linsenmeier etal.,2015; Lobo &
Bordoni,2020). In addition to all these, recent studies have also shown that the planetary rotation rate has an
effect on the surface temperature latitudinal distribution and seasonal cycle (e.g., Edson etal.,2011; Guendelman
& Kaspi,2019; Kaspi & Showman,2015; Liu etal.,2017).
This study explores the seasonality dependence on different planetary parameters in an idealized setting, connect-
ing results from a simplified general circulation model (GCM) and a diffusive energy balance model (EBM). In
the idealized GCM we vary the obliquity, orbital period, and rotation rate. The obliquity represents the role of
the solar forcing, the orbital period represents the role of the atmospheric radiative response, and the rotation rate
Figure 1. The seasonal cycle of the zonally averaged surface temperature on Earth (climatology from 1980 to 2019,
reanalysis data from ERA5), Mars (climatology from reanalysis data from Greybush etal.,2019) and Titan (from a Titan
atmospheric model used in Faulk etal.(2020)).
AGU Advances
GUENDELMAN AND KASPI
10.1029/2022AV000684
3 of 11
represents the role of the dynamics. Although, as mentioned, numerous other parameters can also influence the
temperature, we consider these three as each represents a different part of the radiative and dynamical response
of the climate system. Similarly, in the EBM we explore the roles of obliquity and of a non-dimensional radia-
tive timescale and diffusion. As in the parameters studied in the GCM, these parameters have similar significance,
with the non-dimensional radiative timescale representing the ratio between the orbital period and radiative
timescale and the diffusion reflecting the role of the dynamics and AHT.
Note that in this study we explore the climate of planets in a circular orbit, that is, planets with zero eccentricity.
Planets in an eccentric orbit will experience a more complex seasonal cycle, which can include hemispheric
asymmetry, with different hemispheres experiencing different seasonal intensity (Guendelman & Kaspi,2020;
Ohno & Zhang,2019) and is outside the scope of this study. This manuscript is arranged as follows, in Section2,
we describe the GCM and EBM used in this study. Section3 describes the results, and we conclude and discuss
the significance of this study in Section4.
2. Methods
2.1. General Circulation Model
In this study, we use an idealized GCM with a seasonal cycle (Guendelman & Kaspi,2019). The top of the atmos-
phere is forced by diurnal mean insulation, given by:
𝑄
=
𝑆
0
𝜋
(sin 𝜙sin 𝛿+ cos 𝜙cos 𝛿sin )
,
(2)
where S0 is the solar constant, h is the hour angle of the sun at sunrise and sunset, ϕ is for latitude and δ is the
declination angle (Hartmann,2016). The model is an aquaplanet model with a 10m depth mixed layer as the
lower boundary. The model solves the primitive equations in a T42 horizontal resolution and 25 vertical layers.
The radiation in the model is represented by a two-stream gray radiation scheme. The model utilizes a simplified
parameterization for moist convection processes (Frierson etal.,2006).
We vary the parameters as follows:
Obliquity (γ): 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90.
Orbital period (ω):
1
8
,
1
4
,
1
2
,1,2,
4
.
Rotation rate (Ω):
1
16
,
1
8
,
1
4
,
1
2
,1,
2
.
The values are normalized such that ω=1 is an orbital period of 360 Earth days, and Ω=1 is Earth's rotation
rate. We vary two parameters at a time while keeping the third constant, with Earth-like values, except for the
obliquity, which is 30°. This results in a total of ∼142 simulations. The Earth-like simulation (top right corner
in Figure2) has a stronger seasonal cycle compared to observations as it has a higher obliquity, a relatively low
mixed layer depth, and due to the model's simplicity. Although planets in a short orbital period can become tidally
locked, we do not consider this configuration in this study.
2.2. Energy Balance Model
A more simplified way to study the temperature response to the different parameters is a diffusive EBM, given by:
𝜕𝑇
=𝑄(1−𝑎)−𝜎𝑇 4+𝜕
𝐷cos 𝜙𝜕𝑇
(3)
where C is the effective heat capacity, with the value of C for a 10m mixed layer depth being ∼4×10
7Jm
−2K
−1,
T is the temperature, Q is the diurnal mean insolation, a is the albedo, σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, D is the
diffusion coefficient, taken to be constant (an appropriate value for Earth is ∼0.6Wm
−2K
−1, North & Kim,2017),
and ϕ is latitude. The diurnal mean insolation, Q, is calculated using Equation2. Although it is conventional to
use a linear form for the outgoing longwave radiation (OLR, e.g., Budyko,1969; North & Coakley,1979; Rose
etal.,2017), and is even found to be more accurate for Earth (Koll & Cronin,2018), it involves some assumptions
摘要:

1.IntroductionTheseasonalcyclethataplanetexperiencesisafunctionofalargenumberofparameters.Anecessaryconditionforaplanettoexperienceaseasonalcycleistohaveeithernon-zeroobliquityornon-zeroeccentricity,suchthattheincomingsolarradiationwillhaveaseasonalcycle.Thedegreeofseasonality,however,dependsonother...

展开>> 收起<<
The Key Factors Controlling the Seasonality of Planetary Climate.pdf

共11页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!

相关推荐

分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:11 页 大小:1.32MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-06

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 11
客服
关注