liquid and gas densities. Droplets and/or bubbles form; at later times the droplets coagulate,
eventually triggering a full phase separation in which the liquid sits at the bottom of the
sample and the vapour at the top.
This theoretical picture of metastability is matched experimentally, even though we now
know that actually there is an essential singularity in the gradient at the phase transition. All
mean field theories, computer simulations and real systems agree in that this metastable phase
has a real existence, incidentally in the process demonstrating that too rigid an insistence on a
knowledge of equilibrium properties can sometimes be self-defeating in statistical mechanical
studies. However, usually thermodynamic systems do not reach the spinodal line and some
other process intervenes beforehand causing phase separation and sending the system toward
a phase coexistence of true equilibrium phases. What is required in such cases is so-called
nucleation of the new phase.
The process of nucleation and subsequent growth has thus been the focus of much study
over the years. It is also the main focus of the present study, in which we are particularly
concerned with the effects of defects and impurities on nucleation and droplet growth. The
nucleation involves the formation of a nucleus of the new phase, which then grows (depending
on various conservation laws) to invade the whole of the rest of the system, or alternatively
enforces phase separation into two coexisting equilibria. Examples might be a new solid phase
(say, martensite) invading another which had previously been stable (e.g. austenite), a new
magnetic phase (say, spin up) invading a formerly stable spin-down phase, or a homogeneous
metallic A-B alloy separating into two coexisting alloys, one A-rich and the other B-rich. How
this nucleation occurs is itself a subject of considerable study. Textbooks usually draw a
distinction between homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation.
In homogeneous nucleation droplets of the new phase form (and then usually decay) as fluc-
tuations around the original phase. Droplets in this condition are called subcritical. To reach
the size at which they would grow spontaneously (supercritical droplets) involves a spontaneous
fluctuation with a free energy large enough to overcome the energy barrier ∆Fbarr. When this
is the case the classical Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) theory [3–6] is expected
to capture the main features of the transition. If the system is kept at constant temperature T,
the probability of fluctuations of the proper size is proportional to exp(−∆Fbarr/(kBT)), with
kBthe Boltzmann constant. As a consequence, the process of developing such a fluctuation is
Poisson-like, with the expected time thus proportional to exp(+∆Fbarr/(kBT)), possibly with
a complex prefactor in front.
By contrast, heterogeneous nucleation involves requires either large (i.e., of a dimension
much larger than molecular dimensions) or many impurities to seed the transition process.
The homo/heterogenous character of a phase transition deeply influences its character as well
as the metastable lifetime, that is, the mean decay time of a metastable state. When nucleation
is originated by sufficiently many seeds, the phase transition process is much more rapid and
predictable, in the sense that the standard deviation of the metastable lifetime is reduced.
Clearly, the number of nucleation seeds depends on the size of the system itself: the larger the
system the easier to nucleate transition droplets. For this reason, the term spinodal line has
also been used (see e.g. [7]), and will here be used, to identify the minimum (finite) size of a
system which exhibits heterogeneous nucleation.
The full phase transformation thus involves several distinct stages. Firstly there is an
early-stage stochastic nucleation process. This is followed by a deterministic phase during
which the critical droplet is growing. Finally there is a late stage stochastic phase, during
which the different droplets amalgamate. The dynamics might be expected to be different
depending on conservation laws which dictate the final state equilibrium (is it phase transfor-
mation, or merely phase separation). Until the advent of computer simulation, these processes
were difficult to examine in detail. Even with computer simulations, the sizes involved in
2