
2
time associated with the BH itself2, as analog systems.
As a consequence, by using mirrors, one can deal with
BH radiation models without having a precise descrip-
tion of the (apparent) horizon area and/or of the BH
surface gravity3.
In this work, we investigate the thermodynamic prop-
erties of a mass-varying BH adopting the BH analog pro-
vided by a thermal moving mirror. We focus in particular
on the mass evolution of an evaporating BH in vacuum.
The mathematical simplification of moving mirrors eas-
ily describes the mass evolution through a differential
equation that can be numerically solved. We find cor-
rections to Hawking radiation without postulating the
horizon area and/or the surface gravity. Those correc-
tions are related to the effects that the evaporation is
expected to cause to the radiation, above all, mimick-
ing the back-reaction effect on the metric. We compare
the results that we infer with those in Ref. [23], where
qualitative arguments for the evaporation have been dis-
cussed in view of mirrors. We debate how the expected
small corrections to Hawking radiation, obtained as the
BH evaporates, are of primary importance to help under-
stand BH information loss [41–43]. Indeed, if BH radia-
tion is not precisely thermal, then it carries some infor-
mation from inside to outside the event horizon. Hence,
non-thermality of BH radiation represents a landscape for
the information paradox4. We work out the hypothesis of
quasi-static processes to approximate the first thermody-
namics principle by means of an effective non-equilibrium
temperature. In this respect, we show that the devia-
tions from Hawking radiation is initially small, becoming
larger as BHs evaporate. This causes a decrease of a BH’s
lifetime by a factor ∼3/8. Thus, since the effects of BH
evaporation drastically affects Hawking radiation, mir-
rors may confirm quantum tunneling models for Hawk-
ing radiation [13,14], showing the emitted radiation to
be less entropic than the one predicted in the literature
[2,49–53]. This may be interpreted by assuming part
of the information can be transmitted by BH radiation.
Furthermore, we emphasize in our treatment, it is pos-
sible to construct an argument for the BH age from its
mass and Hawking radiation.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we explain
how moving mirror radiation emulates BHs. In Sec. III
we use this analogy to study BH radiation and its mass
2Attempts towards investigating metrics considering the variation
of its mass can be found in [36–39]
3For evaporating BHs, there is no Killing horizon and the concept
of surface gravity is controversial. The definition of a surface
gravity in these contexts is an ongoing subject of study (see e.g.
[40]).
4In particular, by considering BH evaporation effects, quantum
tunneling models for Hawking radiation provide a significant de-
viation from the thermal spectrum [13–16], which cause a re-
duction of the total BH entropy similar to the one predicted
by quantum gravity [14,16,44–46]. Moreover, there exist a
model-independent argument proving that the non-thermal part
of Hawking radiation cannot be omitted [47,48].
evolution from its creation to its complete evaporation.
In Sec. IV we study the non-equilibrium thermodynam-
ics of BH evaporation, adopting the quasi-static approx-
imation. Finally, Sec. Vis devoted to conclusions and
perspectives of our scheme. Throughout the paper, we
use Planck units c=G=~=kB= 1.
II. BLACK HOLES FROM MIRROR ANALOGY
Here we briefly review the radiation emitted by BHs
and by moving mirrors. We confirm that a trajectory for
a (1+1)D mirror exactly reproduces Hawking radiation
emitted by a (3+1)D BH. We limit our analysis to the
emission of scalar massless particles. The discussion is
split into two subsections focusing on BHs first and then
the moving mirror analog.
A. Black hole radiation
By quantum field theory in curved spacetime, parti-
cle creation occurs whenever the background spacetime
evolves in time [26]. This particle production is easy to
quantify when a spacetime is flat in the infinite past and
infinite future. Indeed, in this case, the normal modes of
the scalar field in the infinite future (or output modes)
{φout
ω}ωcould be obtained from the ones in the infinite
past (or input modes){φin
ω}through the following Bo-
goliubov transformation:
φout
ω=Z∞
0αωω0φin
ω0+βωω0φin∗
ω0dω0.(1)
The non-trivial Bogoliubov coefficients βωω0are not zero,
indicating that particle creation occurs from the vacuum5
[26,56]. The spectrum of particles produced is given by:
Nω=Z∞
0|βωω0|2dω0.(2)
Hawking calculated [1] the Bogoliubov coefficients rela-
tive to a spacetime where a star collapses into a black
hole. In this context, Eq. (1) holds by considering the
output modes {φout
ω}ωas the modes outgoing from the
collapsing star and the input modes {φin
ω}ωas the modes
ingoing towards it. The Bogoliubov coefficient βωω0aris-
ing from a collapsing star with mass Mreads:
βωω0=rω0
ωΓ(1 −4iMω)(iω0)−1+4iMω ,(3)
where Γ is the Euler gamma function. By applying the
modulus square of Eq. (3) we obtain:
|βωω0|2=2M
πω0
1
e8πMω −1,(4)
5For relevant cosmological applications see e.g. [54,55].