programs. Previous solutions in the area of motivation have focused on flexibility and individualism. There have been many
outstanding scientific papers on the subject, and a number of studies have been conducted both in Poland
46
and in the world
6
.
New solutions in this area should go a step further and help shape employees’ professional activity, with particular emphasis on
the durability of employee attitudes influencing motivation understood in the frame of Hygge concept
8,39
. Taking into account
the diversification of employee groups, the concepts should constitute the foundation for creating the tools of motivation. They
should be aimed at satisfying the different needs, expectations, and aspirations of employees, building a sense of happiness at
work, maintaining a balance between work and private life, as well as material status. In this context, the issue of effective
motivating employees is a significant scientific problem, particularly related to young people from Generation Z, who entered
the labour market
51
. The problem has only been partially signalled in the literature on the subject and mostly refers to the
identifying employees’ needs and expectations as part of the motivational activities
21,35,56
. There is a gap in this respect, which
has become a premise for undertaking the research presented in this article.
The paper adopts a conventional division into traditional and modern approaches to employee motivation. The available
literature of the considered problem, we can find a division into the traditional approach to motivating (e.g.
1,42
) and the modern
approach to motivating
17
. Some researchers understand the traditional approach to motivation as remuneration and prestige,
often supplemented with meaning, creation, challenge, property, and identity. Furthermore, the modern approach identifies ways
of encouraging employees to be more productive and happy simultaneously
17
. Traditional motivation equated with challenging
and stimulation, and defined as conscious and deliberate influencing employees to achieve motivator’s goals optimally, can be
found at work. Concepts based on the traditional approach have undoubtedly made a creative contribution to understanding the
phenomenon of work motivation, its sources and mechanisms. The identified needs and expectations, however, did not take into
account the diversity and complexity of the contemporary organizational environment, created, among others, by the dynamic
development of information technologies, demographic changes (ageing societies), social changes (new behaviour patterns),
including generational changes (new needs and expectations, aspirations and priorities regarding life and work). Also innovative
entrepreneurs want to increase productivity and well-being by using appreciate motivation tools
24
. Therefore, the traditional
approach becomes of little use in solving problems in terms of motivating employees faced by contemporary organizations.
The modern approach places a much stronger emphasis on the role of motivation in the labour resources structure. In particular,
the age diversity forces a new perspective on the role of work in human life - work that gives a sense of happiness. Taking up
the aspects of modern concepts of motivating, taking into account generational diversity, stems mainly from cognitive motives,
and has practical justification.
Before Covid-19 organisational success was determined by a high level of employee motivation and managers who properly
manage by individuals motivation
17,60
and groups motivation
45
. During the Covid-19 it is noted that managers need to update
their strategies and provide a new approach to motivation, especially to the motivation of young people. Expect drastic changes
in the upcoming new workforce just entering the labour market. Therefore, the question arises how employers must adapt to the
expectations of young people - the first generation which grew up in the era of smartphones and social media, and one which
leads a diverse lifestyle during Covid-19.
The objective of this paper is to present a new approach to the employee motivation of young people before and during
Covid-19 from theirs point of view. The paper aims is to propose new tools connecting employee motivation and all areas of
the Hygge concept, called Hygge star model which components have positive influence on employee motivation before and
during Covid-19. We discuss different impacts of new approach to motivation before and during Covid-19 of Generation Z.
Finally, our research showed that there is a need to introduce a new approach that will increase employees’ motivation during
the pandemic time. This approach try to answer to expectations of young people from Generation Z46,47.
The paper is organized as follows. The next section discusses the theoretical models of motivations in the workplace.
Further we present empirical part describing methodology and data analysis using factor analysis. Paper ends with conclusions.
Theories of motivation in the workplace
First theories of motivation were created at the beginning of the 20th century. Since then, numerous research theories of
workplace motivation arose throughout the decades. Among them, we can distinguish the needs theories concerned with
assessing the needs which the workplace meets or what needs the employee strives to have met
6,11
. Classical theory depiction
of human motivation, which we know as the Maslow’s hierarchy of needs42 is based on the assumption that individuals strive
to satiate a set of needs and if these needs are met (e.g. through work), then this will lead to greater job satisfaction. In this
context we can finds some implications of Malow’s theory for managers and some limitations
22,32
. The existence, relatedness,
and growth (ERG theory) theory of Adlerfer
3
further developed Maslov’s theory. According to Adlerfer the needs can be
categorized into three sets: Existence, Relatedness, and Growth. The ERG theory does not assume that the satisfaction of
lower order needs is required before pursuing higher order needs
58
. We should note that the results are similar in both theories.
The difference is that Maslow was unable to establish empirical evidence and most of the studies were not able to validate his
theory
25,36,38,57
either. The next well-known theory of employee motivation was formulated by Frederick Herzberg
28
. The
2/13