immediately decided that Pohi was largely dependent on Kornbluth for the high
quality of their novels. They proceeded to pick the works apart, deciding who
had done what-and the parts they admired were always ascribed to Kornbluth.
Kornbluth agreed with Pohi that these critics were amazingly consistent
in being wrong about it, so far as could be remembered. But this didn't quiet
the part-pickers. Even the publication of Pohl's first independent novel,
Slave Ship, wasn't enough to convince them, though it certainly should have
done so. However, as other works by Pohi appeared, even the most severe
critics were forced to concede that he was one of the major novelists of the
field.
Meantime, among the readers, he was developing a high reputation as a
writer of shorter fiction, in which he had no collaborator. His novelette,
"The Midas Plague," was the first of his independent stories to appear in
Galaxy Magazine, in April, 1954. This is a brilliant example of satirical
writing, with the shocking bite of its main assumption muted nicely by an
element of humor. It is also an extrapolation of one trend, carried just a bit
further than any other writer would dare to go with it, and then justified by
the other welldeveloped details of such a society.
I recently had an excellent chance to discover just how good Pohl is as
a writer of shorter fiction. In making the selections that appear in this
book, I read through every word of eight collections of Pohl's shorter works.
That comes to about half a million words!
Generally I've found that reading all of any one collection of shorts
and novelettes by a single writer is not to be done at a single stretch. After
all, shorter works are never meant to be read together, but rather to be
separated by many months in magazine publication. Most writers tend to stick
to certain themes, or do certain types of stories much better than others.
When read at one sitting, these become too obvious, too repetitive-boring, in
fact, in such an unfair way of reading them.
For that reason, I approached the task rather reluctantly. I planned to
read one book at a time, then wait a week, and try another.
It didn't work that way. I read all eight books in less than a week- and
found that I thoroughly enjoyed them. I not only didn't find that the reading
grew monotonous, but I began to look forward to each new volume with
anticipation.
The works in this collection all appeared between 1954 and 1967;
there have been outstanding stories since, but I agree with Frederik Poll that
we need more time to determine which of those should endure as his best.
Meantime, these are the ones I consider his best, chosen from a rich
production that can often ~'be honestly termed memorable. Probably other
readers would have made other choices
-there are too many good stories to make selection simple. But I have chosen
these after a great deal of consideration.
As I read, I kept a list of the stories I felt mandatory for inclusion,
planning to fill the remainder with "next-best" stories. Again, it didn't work
out that way. My list of "must" stories was twice as long as the limits of the
book permitted. So I had to go back and weed out stories, hating to eliminate
even one, to reach a manageable length.
There seems to be no limit to the variety to be found in the shorter
works of Frederik Pohi, in fact. They vary in length from 1,500 to 21,000
words, and that is the smallest element of their variety. Some of them, like
"The Midas Plague," might be called satirical-but not with the cold sardonic
contrivance so common to this much-abused form of literature. Pohl is involved
in the cultures he shows; he may be sardonic or amused, but he feels himself a
part of that which he holds up to the distorting mirror of reality.
Some stories depend on a twist at the end; usually this occurs in the
shorter pieces, as should be the case. However, the twist is not to surprise