FERMILAB-PUB-22-739-T Searching For Dark Matter with Plasma Haloscopes Alexander J. Millar1 2 3 aSteven M. Anlage4Rustam Balafendiev5Pavel Belov6Karl van Bibber7Jan Conrad1

2025-05-06 0 0 7.53MB 26 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
FERMILAB-PUB-22-739-T
Searching For Dark Matter with Plasma Haloscopes
Alexander J. Millar,1, 2, 3, aSteven M. Anlage,4Rustam Balafendiev,5Pavel Belov,6Karl van Bibber,7Jan Conrad,1
Marcel Demarteau,8Alexander Droster,7Katherine Dunne,1Andrea Gallo Rosso,1Jon E. Gudmundsson,1, 5
Heather Jackson,7Gagandeep Kaur,9, 1 Tove Klaesson,1Nolan Kowitt,7Matthew Lawson,1, 2 Alexander
Leder,7Akira Miyazaki,10 Sid Morampudi,11 Hiranya V. Peiris,1, 12 Henrik S. Røising,13 Gaganpreet Singh,1
Dajie Sun,7Jacob H. Thomas,14 Frank Wilczek,1, 11, 15, 16 Stafford Withington,17 and Mackenzie Wooten7
(Endorsers)
Jens Dilling,8Michael Febbraro,8Stefan Knirck,3and Claire Marvinney8
1The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
2Nordita, KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Roslagstullsbacken 23, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
3Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
4Quantum Materials Center, Physics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4111 USA
5Science Institute, University of Iceland, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland
6Narxoz University, Zhandossov street 55, 050035 Almaty, Kazakhstan
7Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
8Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN 37831
9Centre for Lasers and Photonics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Kanpur, 208016, India
10Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 75237, Sweden
11Center for Theoretical Physics, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
12University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
13Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
14X1, Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
15T.D. Lee Institute and Wilczek Quantum Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
16Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
17Department Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU
We summarise the recent progress of the Axion Longitudinal Plasma HAloscope (ALPHA) Con-
sortium, a new experimental collaboration to build a plasma haloscope to search for axions and
dark photons. The plasma haloscope is a novel method for the detection of the resonant conversion
of light dark matter to photons. ALPHA will be sensitive to QCD axions over almost a decade of
parameter space, potentially discovering dark matter and resolving the Strong CP problem. Unlike
traditional cavity haloscopes, which are generally limited in volume by the Compton wavelength
of the dark matter, plasma haloscopes use a wire metamaterial to create a tuneable artificial plasma
frequency, decoupling the wavelength of light from the Compton wavelength and allowing for much
stronger signals. We develop the theoretical foundations of plasma haloscopes and discuss recent
experimental progress. Finally, we outline a baseline design for ALPHA and show that a full-scale
experiment could discover QCD axions over almost a decade of parameter space.
CONTENTS
I. Introduction 2
II. Analytic Formulation 3
A. Solving the Axion-Maxwell Equations 3
B. Signal Readout 5
C. Eigenmode Calculation 6
D. Example: The Rectangular Resonator 8
TM Modes 8
TE Modes 9
E. Resistive Losses 9
III. Numerical Simulations 10
A. Mode Structure 10
aamillar@fnal.gov
B. Quality Factor 11
C. Tuning 11
IV. Experiment Prototypes 12
A. Measurements in Free Space 12
Experimental setup and measurements 12
B. Measurements in Brass Cavity 14
C. Measurements in Copper Cavity 15
V. Superconducting Wires 16
VI. Experiment Design 18
VII. Discovery Potential 18
VIII. Summary and Conclusion 21
Acknowledgments 22
arXiv:2210.00017v3 [hep-ph] 22 Mar 2023
2
References 22
I. INTRODUCTION
A wide variety of astronomical observations and the
modern theoretical understanding of structure forma-
tion in the Universe support the hypothesis that a new
form of matter, not accounted for in our standard model
of fundamental physics, supplies much of the mass of
the Universe. Indeed, what is often called the “standard
model of cosmology” and abbreviated ΛCDM incorpo-
rates both a cosmological term Λand Cold Dark Matter,
a hypothetical substance that interacts very feebly with
ordinary (baryonic) matter and with itself.
Because of the equivalence principle, the astronomi-
cal and cosmological evidence gives us only limited in-
formation about the nature of dark matter. The simplest
hypothesis, conceptually, is that it is a very long-lived
elementary particle that does not carry electromagnetic
or color charge. This particle must be abundantly pro-
duced in the early universe but then decoupled at a
time when its typical velocities are non-relativistic (i.e,
it is “cold”).
In recent years much attention has focused on axions
as a candidate to provide the dark matter in our Uni-
verse. Axions first appeared superficially in an unre-
lated context, namely the issue of why a parameter, θ,
that appears in the standard model is empirically con-
strained to be exceedingly small: |θ|.1010. A “nat-
urally” large value of θ, i.e. θ1, would introduce T
violating effects - specifically, electric dipole moments
of protons and neutrons - at levels that far exceed ex-
perimental constraints. This difficulty led Peccei and
Quinn [1] to propose extending the standard model
to incorporate an additional (anomalous and sponta-
neously broken) U(1)symmetry, now known as Peccei-
Quinn or PQ symmetry. Weinberg and Wilczek [2,3]
independently observed that this proposal necessarily
leads to the existence of a new light spin 0 particle,
the axion, that is highly stable and interacts very feebly
with ordinary matter. Unfortunately, present-day the-
ory is unable to predict the precise value of the axion
mass ma, however the requirement to solve the Strong
CP problem tightly constrains the interactions of the
axion relative to that mass, leading to an almost one-
parameter theory.
Consideration of the production of axions in the early
Universe and their subsequent evolution [49] reveals
that their properties are consistent with the observed
properties of cold dark matter.
Big Bang cosmology incorporating axions follows
two qualitatively distinct scenarios, depending on
whether an inflationary epoch intervenes between ax-
ion decoupling and the present. If not, then it is pos-
sible – although challenging – to relate mato the den-
sity of axion matter present in the Universe today (post-
inflationary scenario). If axions dominate the observed
dark matter, the most recent calculations [1017] favor
ma=40 180 µeV (with ma=65 ±6µeV if the spec-
trum of axions radiated as during the decay of topolog-
ical defects is scale invariant).
On the other hand, reheating after inflation might not
restore PQ symmetry. In this case, inflation essentially
enforces a constant (but random) initial value θiwithin
the entire observable Universe, thus providing an un-
known initial condition. This opens the possibility of
axion models with significantly smaller values of ma,
correlated with very small values of θi(pre-inflationary
scenario). But if we insist on avoiding fine-tuning or an-
thropic reasoning, it is natural to estimate θi=O(1),
and then we find 101µeV .ma.100 µeV.1
These considerations motivate experiments to test the
hypothesis that axions, with a mass in the range of
O(10)O(100)µeV, exist and constitute the cosmolog-
ical dark matter. The traditional approach to axion (and
similar hidden photon [8,2022]) dark matter searches
is based on use of a resonant cavity, designed so that
a resonant mode (typically the lowest transverse mag-
netic mode) matches the Compton wavelength of the
dark matter [23]. Whilst this is adequate for relatively
low frequencies (hundreds of MHz to a few GHz [23
25]) the diminishing size of the cavity at high frequen-
cies leads to a rapid deterioration in signal power.
This problem, and the perceived promise of the axion
hypothesis, has inspired a torrent of new experimental
ideas. Some proposals relevant to the indicated mass
range involve using multiple or coupled cavities [26
30]; others abandon the traditional cavity altogether,
and substitute either a mirror, as in the case of a dish
antenna [3135] or an array of large dielectric disks
[3639]. (Completely different ideas come into play for
ultra-small values of ma.) For recent comprehensive re-
views see [4042].
These approaches, broadly speaking, attempt to over-
come the barrier to resonance that arises due to the
mismatch between the fundamentally massless pho-
ton and a massive, non-relativistic axion by breaking
translation invariance, thus providing momentum. The
leading idea of Ref. [43], pursued by ALPHA and dis-
cussed in detail here, is instead to provide the photon
with an effective mass corresponding to its plasma fre-
quency.2This has the fundamental advantage that it
allows wavelength matching up to the de Broglie rather
than the Compton wavelength of the dark-matter ax-
ions, and thus allows use of much larger resonant sys-
tems.
As is well known, photons acquire an effective mass
inside a plasma. No natural plasma has all the required
1Other options include modifying the cosmology so that θis not a
random choice between {0, 2π}, for example Refs. [18,19].
2In THz regime there have been some similar concepts to make an
effective massive photon quasiparticle (polariton) using condensed
matter axions [44,45] and optical phonons [46,47].
3
properties (viz., cryogenic operation, low loss, and tune-
ability) within the frequency range of interest, but an ar-
tificial plasma, consisting of an array of thin wires [48],
appears to be suitable. Notably, because the properties
of wire metamaterials depend primarily on the geom-
etry of the system, the plasma frequency can be tuned
through geometric changes [49,50]. These properties
make wire metamaterials excellent candidate materials
to implement the concept of a plasma haloscope.
The application of plasma haloscopes is not lim-
ited to the QCD axions from the spontaneously bro-
ken PQ symmetry. More generally, a plasma haloscope
can address any light particles interacting with high-
frequency microwaves. Physics beyond the Standard
Model, such as string theory, universally predicts new
scalar and pseudoscalar bosons or extra U(1)gauge
bosons. The former is often referred to as axion-like par-
ticles and is free from the theoretical constraint in mass
and coupling of QCD axions [8,5156]. The latter are
hidden photons (HP) or dark photons, though parapho-
tons has also been used historically [5760]. The tech-
nical requirements of searching for these particles are
very similar to that of axions but without needing a
static magnetic field [22,61].
In this white paper we develop an analytic formalism
for plasma haloscopes, proving the formulas used in
Ref. [43] and developing an overlap integral formalism
applicable when the system exhibits a single mode. Us-
ing numerical simulations, we also explore the expected
quality factors of wire metamaterials at low tempera-
tures and practical tuning geometries. We then review
recent experimental work by Refs. [50,62] that validates
our theoretical analysis. We also introduce supercon-
ducting metamaterial as an alternative candidate for a
tuneable effective plasma with higher unloaded qual-
ity factor. Finally, we outline an overall design for the
ALPHA project and make projections for the expected
sensitivities of exploratory and full scale experiments.
II. ANALYTIC FORMULATION
Here we calculate the interactions of axions with our
detector, a tuneable plasma.
First, we will set up and formally solve the Maxwell
equations coupled with the Klein-Gordon equation of
axion (axion-Maxwell equation), estimating the mi-
crowave power produced in such a device. Then, we
further develop the single mode approximation, obtain-
ing a convenient overlap integral. Finally, we exploit
the analysis of Ref. [62] to find explicit expressions for
rectangular plasma modes, enabling us to estimate the
unloaded quality factor for a given choice of wire ma-
terial.
A. Solving the Axion-Maxwell Equations
We are interested in calculating the conversion of ax-
ions to photons in a finite plasma. Throughout this
work unless otherwise specified we use natural units
with the Lorentz-Heaviside for electromagnetic units.
The axion-Maxwell equations in a medium are given
by
·D=gaγB·a, (1a)
∇×H˙
D=gaγ(B˙
aE×∇a), (1b)
·B=0 , (1c)
×E+˙
B=0 , (1d)
¨
a2a+m2
aa=gaγE·B. (1e)
Here we have defined Eas the electric field, Bas the
magnetic flux density with Dand Hthe displacement
and magnetic field strengths, respectively. We have ne-
glected any free charges or currents as we are interested
in axion-sourced fields. Neglecting the small spatial
gradient of the axion, the axion field is giving by the
real part of
a=a0eimat, (2)
where a0is the axion field strength coming from the
axion dark matter density
ρa=m2
aa2
0
2. (3)
The axion couples to the photon via a dimensional cou-
pling gaγ. Such a coupling is also often written as a di-
mensionless quantity Caγ, which makes use of the fact
that for the QCD axion the mass and coupling can be
calculated from the axion decay constant fa, numeri-
cally found to be [63]
ma=5.70(6)(4)µeV 1012 GeV
fa, (4a)
gaγ=α
2πfa
Caγ, (4b)
Caγ=E
N1.92(4), (4c)
where αis the fine structure constant, Eis the elec-
tromagnetic anomaly and Nis the colour anomaly
(also known as the domain wall number) of the axion.
For the simplest standard benchmark KSVZ and DFSZ
models |Caγ|=1.92, and 0.746 respectively [6467].
We will linearise the system around an external mag-
netic field Bethat solves Maxwell’s equations indepen-
dently (its sources are left implicit). Thus, to first order
in gaγwe have
·D=gaγBe·a, (5a)
∇×H˙
D=gaγBe˙
a, (5b)
·B=0 , (5c)
×E+˙
B=0 , (5d)
¨
a2a+m2
aa=gaγE·Be, (5e)
4
where now Bonly contains the axion-induced mag-
netic fields. We will now turn our attention to a plasma
that is infinite in one direction (which we will take to
be the z direction), but bounded in the transverse direc-
tions. This defines a commonly encountered “plasma
waveguide” configuration, whose analysis we will bor-
row [68].
As we anticipate a wire metamaterial (WM), we will
assume that the medium only has a plasma response in
one direction, aligned with the cylinder, acting as vac-
uum in the other two directions. This is summarised in
a an electric permittivity ez. For simplicity we will con-
sider µ=1. The symmetry of the system allows us to
break up the fields into the transverse and z directions,
writing
B=Bt+Bzˆz;E=Et+Ezˆz;Be=Beˆz, (6)
where the subscript tstands for transverse. We can an-
alyze the fields into harmonic components, assuming
that the fields oscillate with angular frequency ω, for
which we derive (5a) and (5d)
t+
zˆz×(Bt+Bzˆz)=iω(Et+ezEzˆz)
iωgaγaBeˆz, (7a)
t+
zˆz×(Et+Ezˆz)=iω(Bt+Bzˆz). (7b)
Note that the transverse curl of the transverse vectors
is necessarily in the z direction, so we can divide these
equations into
ˆz·t×Bt=iωezEziωgaγaBe, (8a)
ˆz·t×Et=iωBz, (8b)
ˆz×Bt
z+tBz׈z=iωEt, (8c)
ˆz×Et
z+tEz׈z=iωBt. (8d)
Taking the fields’ z dependence to be of the form eikzz,
we arrive at a closed form for Btand Et;
Et=1
ω2k2
zEz
z+iωtBz׈z, (9a)
Bt=1
ω2k2
zBz
ziωtEz׈z. (9b)
Thus the transverse fields depend only on Ezand Bz.
This is a consequence of the fact that the axion driving
term arises only in the direction of the external B-field.
Since the axion does not couple to Bzmode, for modes
that do bring it in geometrically we can neglect it, and
focus on Ez, obeying
ω2
ω2k2
z2
tEz+ω2ezEz+m2
agaγBea=0 . (10)
For a cylindrical structure it is easiest to bring in cylin-
drical coordinates, yielding
ω2
ω2k2r22Ez
2r+rEz
r+r2ω2ezEz+r2ω2gaγBea=0 ,
(11)
where we have dropped the subscript on kkz. This
is solved by
Ez=agaγBe
ez
+C1J0(irezpk2ω2)
+C2Y0(irezpk2ω2), (12)
where J0,Y0are standard Bessel functions and C1,C2
are constants.
To incorporate a bounded medium we need to solve
the differential equations in both the external and
plasma region and to match the solutions by apply-
ing appropriate boundary conditions. For concreteness
we will consider the outside to be a conductor; other
boundary conditions can be handled similarly for ex-
ample including an air gap between the conductor and
plasma or absorbing material. Since Y0(0) = , so for
the plasma region (centered, of course, on the z-axis) we
use C2=0. Thus the solution inside the plasma is
Ez=agaγBe
ez
+C1J0(irezpk2ω2). (13)
Here the first term is the solution for a homogeneous
medium. It will be approached in the limit that the
plasma radius is infinite.
To proceed further we assume that we are only look-
ing for modes which will maximially couple to the ax-
ion, and so will a uniform zstructure (i.e., k=0). The
transverse fields are given by
Et=0 , (14a)
Bt=i
ω
Ez
rˆ
θ. (14b)
To find the solution outside the cylinder, we must know
the relevant boundary conditions. We will assume that
only the plasma itself is magnetised (i.e., Be=0 out-
side the plasma) and that the plasma is surrounded
by a conductor, so that the tangential component of
the E-field (i.e, Ez), vanishes. Specifying the plasma-
conductor boundary at a radius R, we see that
Ez=agaγBe
ez
+agaγBe
ez
J0(ezrω)
J0(ezRω), (15a)
Bt=agaγBe
ez
J1(ezrω)
J0(ezRω)ˆ
θ. (15b)
We are primarily interested in resonant (longitudi-
nal) modes, where Re(ez) = 0. As J0(0) = 1, be-
haviour in the centre of the medium is determined by
J0(ezRω). As R,J0(ezRω), so the second
term in the E-field vanishes. Similarly, J1(0) = 0 implies
5
that the B-field only exists in the outer portions of the
medium. Thus a sufficiency large medium has a bulk
that behaves exactly the same as in the infinite medium
case. However, note that this behaviour depends on e00
z;
smaller e00
zrequires a larger Rfor the medium to appear
homogeneous.
B. Signal Readout
Of course the goal is not just to create an E-field, but
to measure it by coupling it to an amplifier using an
antenna. To discuss the signal that could be read out
by an amplifier, we must have some description of the
readout and losses. To look at the material losses, in
the Drude model, which is typically used to describe
metals, ecan be written as
e=1ω2
p
ω2+iωΓp'1ω2
p
ω2+iΓpω2
p
ω3, (16)
where ωpis the (angular) plasma frequency and Γp
is the inverse lifetime of the plasmon. To include an-
tenna losses, i.e., the power extracted by an antenna
which comprises the signal, we can add in an addi-
tional damping term, Γa(which may be frequency de-
pendent), giving a total dielectric constant
e=1ω2
p
ω2+iωΓp
+iΓa
ω. (17)
(Such an expression implicitly assumes that the antenna
couples efficiently to all parts of the system. As we will
discuss below, for very large systems this can require
multiple antennas.) This allows for a total loss rate Γt
near the plasma frequency in the medium, where
Γt=Γp
ω2
p
ω2+Γa, (18)
We define the quality factor as
Q=ωU
P. (19)
Uis the stored energy and P=˙
Uthe power. The en-
ergy stored an isotropic medium with temporal disper-
sion is given by
U=1
4Z()
ω|~
E|2+|~
B|2dV '1
2Z|~
E|2dV , (20)
where the latter holds exactly in the limit where the
axion velocity and higher order powers of gaγare ne-
glected. As our medium is simply aligned (i.e., the E-
field excited by the axion is only in the direction aligned
with the wires), the isotropic formula gives the same
answer as an anisotropic one. We also neglect spatial
dispersion, as for uniaxial wires this exists only for mo-
mentum in the z-direction [69]. To find the losses in the
medium we can use the imaginary component of the
effective dielectric constant e00
zusing [70]
P=ωe00
z
2Z|Ez|2dV . (21)
Putting Eqns. (20) and (21) together, we then find
Q=1
e00
z
. (22)
Here we will treat the system as having a single loss fac-
tor, thus defining the “loaded quality factor”, in other
words the quality factor of the system with an antenna
system included. Conversely, the quality factor which
only includes resistive losses is generally refered to as
the ”unloaded quality factor”. The signal power can
then be written as
Ps=κGVQ
ma
ρag2
aγB2
e, (23)
where
G=1
a2
0g2
aγB2
eVQ2Z|E|2dV . (24)
While we have defined Gto serve a similar role to the
geometry factor in a cavity haloscope, the definition
and derivation of Gdiffers conceptually. It does not
contain the overlap of the axion and photon wavefunc-
tions directly, but is rather a normalisation of the stored
energy in the resonator. We have defined κ=Γa/Γtto
take into account that only the power into the antenna
is read out.
Note that near the plasma frequency e'iΓt/ωp, so
Q=1/|e|, and after some rearranging we reproduce
the formula for the Gin Ref. [43] for ma=ωp,
G=|ez|2
a2
0g2
aγB2
eVZ|E|2dV . (25)
So far, our derivation has been for axion dark mat-
ter. However, plasma haloscopes are also very sensi-
tive to hidden photons (HP) [49]. HPs are a massive
U(1) gauge boson which mixes with the visible photon.
This interaction is described to lowest order by the La-
grangian within the propagation basis (i.e. the mass
basis) as [60,61,71,72]
L=1
4˜
Fµν ˜
Fµν 1
4˜
F0
µν ˜
F0µν +χ
2˜
Fµν ˜
F0µν
+mX2
2˜
Xµ˜
Xµ+eJµ˜
Aµ,
(26)
where the dark vector field is ˜
Xµ, the dark photon ten-
sor ˜
F0
µν,χis the mixing coupling constant, mXis the
mass of the dark photon, eis the electric charge, Jµis
摘要:

FERMILAB-PUB-22-739-TSearchingForDarkMatterwithPlasmaHaloscopesAlexanderJ.Millar,1,2,3,aStevenM.Anlage,4RustamBalafendiev,5PavelBelov,6KarlvanBibber,7JanConrad,1MarcelDemarteau,8AlexanderDroster,7KatherineDunne,1AndreaGalloRosso,1JonE.Gudmundsson,1,5HeatherJackson,7GagandeepKaur,9,1ToveKlaesson,1Nol...

展开>> 收起<<
FERMILAB-PUB-22-739-T Searching For Dark Matter with Plasma Haloscopes Alexander J. Millar1 2 3 aSteven M. Anlage4Rustam Balafendiev5Pavel Belov6Karl van Bibber7Jan Conrad1.pdf

共26页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:26 页 大小:7.53MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-06

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 26
客服
关注