
2
to demonstrate that the long-standing issue of resulting
in the same physical observables with different current
components can be resolved for the two-point physical
observables, explicitly in the analysis of the decay con-
stants for the one-body current matrix element compu-
tation with the aforementioned self-consistent condition
stemmed from the BT construction. We note that the
meson system of the constituent quark and antiquark
presented in this work is immune to the limitation of the
BT construction regarding the cluster separability for the
systems of more than two particles [31].
Within the scope described above, we show for the
first time the uniqueness of pseudoscalar and vector me-
son decay constants using all available components of the
current in our LFQM being consistent with the BT con-
struction for the one-body current matrix element com-
putation. We explicitly demonstrate that the same de-
cay constants are resulted not only for all possible current
components but also for the polarization vectors indepen-
dent of the reference frame. Our explicit demonstration
is in fact related to the Lorentz invariant property that
could not be obtained in the relativistic quark models
based on LFD without implementing the aforementioned
self-consistency condition.
Theoretical framework.— While our demonstration
can be applied to the mesons composed of unequal-mass
constituents in general, here we focus on the equal mass
case of the constituents for simplicity. The essential as-
pect of the standard LFQM for the meson state [4–10] is
to saturate the Fock state expansion by the constituent
quark and antiquark and treat the Fock state in a non-
interacting representation. The interactions are then en-
coded in the LF wave function ΨJJz
λ1λ2(p1,p2), which is
the mass eigenfunction. The meson state |M(P, J, Jz)i ≡
|Mi of momentum Pand spin state (J, Jz) can be con-
structed as
|Mi =Zd3p1d3p22(2π)3δ3(P−p1−p2)
×X
λ1,λ2
ΨJJz
λ1λ2(p1,p2)|Q(p1, λ1)¯
Q(p2, λ2)i,(1)
where pµ
iand λiare the momenta and the helicities
of the on-mass shell (p2
i=m2
i) constituent quarks, re-
spectively. For the equal mass case, we set mi=m.
Here, p= (p+,p⊥) and d3pi≡dp+
id2pi⊥/(16π3).
The LF relative momentum variables (x, k⊥) are defined
as xi=p+
i/P +and ki⊥=pi⊥−xiP⊥, which sat-
isfy Pixi= 1 and Piki⊥= 0. By setting x≡x1
and k⊥≡k1⊥, we decompose the LF wave function
as ΨJJz
λ1λ2(x, k⊥) = φ(x, k⊥)RJJz
λ1λ2(x, k⊥), where φ(x, k⊥)
is the radial wave function and RJJz
λ1λ2is the SO wave
function obtained by the interaction-independent Melosh
transformation.
The covariant forms of the SO wave functions are
RJJz
λ1λ2= ¯uλ1(p1)Γvλ2(p2)/(√2M0), where Γ = γ5and
−ˆ
/
(Jz) + ˆ(Jz)·(p1−p2)/(M0+ 2m) for pseudoscalar
and vector mesons, respectively,1and M2
0=Pi(k2
i⊥+
m2
i)/xi. The polarization vectors ˆµ(Jz) of the vector me-
son are given by ˆµ(±1) = (0,2⊥(±1)·P⊥/P +,⊥(±1))
with ⊥(±1) = ∓(1,±i)/√2 for transverse polarizations
and ˆµ(0) = (P+,(P2
⊥−M2
0)/P +,P⊥)/M0for longitu-
dinal polarization [4,5]. One of the important char-
acteristics of our LFQM in contrast to other covariant
field theoretic computations in LFD [13–15] is to use
M0other than the physical mass Min defining RJJz
λ1λ2
and ˆµ(0) as well. Because of this property imposed by
the on-shellness of the constituents, which is consistent
with the BT construction, the SO wave functions satisfy
the unitary condition, Pλ1,λ2RJJz†
λ1λ2RJJz
λ1λ2= 1, indepen-
dent of model parameters. Furthermore, the longitudi-
nal polarization vector satisfies P·ˆ(0) = 0 only when
P=p1+p2or equivalently P2=M2
0, which we call the
self-consistency condition. We should note that the LF
energy conservation (P−=p−
1+p−
2) in addition to the LF
three-momentum conservation at the meson-quark vertex
is required for the calculations of the physical observables
using the matrix element with the one-body current to
be consistent with the BT construction [29,30] up to the
level of computation presented in this work as the meson
state is constructed by the noninteracting Q¯
Qrepresen-
tations. The interaction between quark and antiquark
is implemented in the radial wave function through the
mass spectroscopic analysis as discussed below. This con-
dition will be shown to be important in the complete
covariant analysis of the meson decay constants in the
LFQM.
The interactions between quark and antiquark are in-
cluded in the mass operator [29,30] to compute the mass
eigenvalue of the meson state. In our LFQM, we treat
the radial wave function as a trial function for the varia-
tional principle to the QCD-motivated effective Hamilto-
nian HQ¯
Q, i.e., HQ¯
Q|Ψi= (M0+VQ¯
Q)|Ψi=M|Ψi, so
that the mass eigenvalue is obtained from the interaction
potential VQ¯
Qin addition to the relativistic free energies
of quark and antiquark. The detailed mass spectroscopic
analysis can be found in Refs. [11,12]. For the radial
wave function of the 1Sstate meson, we use the Gaus-
sian wave function φ(x, k⊥) = p∂kz/∂x ˆ
φ(k) as a trial
wave function, where ˆ
φ(k) = (4π3/4/β3/2) exp−k2/2β2
and βis the variational parameter fixed by mass spectro-
scopic analysis. It should be mentioned, however, that
our observation and discussion about the independence
of the model predictions with respect to the components
of the current, the polarization vectors, and the refer-
ence frames is completely irrelevant to any specific form
of the radial wave function as far as the Jacobian factor
p∂kz/∂x, which is crucial for the Lorentz invariance of
1The Lorentz invariant properties with the BT construction dis-
cussed here would in general apply to other types of the wave
function vertices as well, e.g., the axial vector coupling for the
pseudoscalar meson vertex in the analysis of axial anomaly.