2
ment and on a structure of the medium, both can change
over time. Anomalous diffusion with evolving anomalous
diffusion exponent has been observed in transport of col-
loidal particles between two parallel plates [35], endoge-
nous lipid granules in living yeast cells [36], microspheres
in a living eukaryotic cell [37] and in bacterial motion
on small beads in a freely suspended soap film [38]. A
change in the diffusion type can occur in the diffusion of
passive molecules in the active bath where moving par-
ticles can affect the movement of passive molecules. Ac-
tive swimmers can enhance diffusion of passive particles
[39]. The change of diffusion of self-propelled particles
and passive particles in an environment with motile mi-
croorgamisms is described in Ref. [40]. Active molecules
can take energy from the environment and use it to make
long jumps. Some diffusing molecules can use chemical
reactions to achieve autonomous propulsion [41]. This
mechanism leads to the process in which σ2evolves much
faster than the linear function of time. The nature of dif-
fusion may also change when the directed movement of a
molecule over short time intervals is disturbed by a ran-
dom change in the direction of the molecule’s movement
due to rotational diffusion.
In intracellular transport in most eukaryotic cells
molecules diffuse through the filament network. When
particle transport is carried out along filaments, the par-
ticles can move ballistically (i.e. with β= 2). However,
changing the orientation and polarization of the filaments
may change the nature of diffusion [42]. Some microor-
ganisms, such as bacteria, move more quickly in more
viscous media. This is because the addition of a viscos-
ity enhancer creates a quasi-rigid network to facilitate
the transport of molecules [43, 44]. Thus, an increase
in viscosity may paradoxically facilitate diffusion. Var-
ious bacterial defense mechanisms against the action of
an antibiotic may hinder but also facilitate the diffusion
of antibiotic molecules in the biofilm [45, 46]. Bacterial
defense abilities evolve over time, which can change dif-
fusion parameters [24, 25].
When the diffusion parameters are not constant, var-
ious equations have been used to describe the diffusion
processes. The examples are subdiffusion equations with
a fractional time derivative of the order depending on
time and/or on a spatial variable [47–58], the superstatis-
tics approach [59] in which certain distribution of diffu-
sion parameters is assumed, subdiffusion equation with
distributed fractional order derivative [60], and with a lin-
ear combination of fractional time derivatives of different
orders where the time evolution of MSD is a linear com-
bination of power functions with different exponents [61].
Diffusion of passive molecules in suspension of eukaryotic
swimming microorganisms is describes by a probability
density function which is a linear combination of Gaus-
sian and exponential Laplace distributions; we mention
that validity of this function has been checked by means
of the scaling method [62]. Distributed order of fractional
derivative in subdiffusion equation can lead to delayed or
accelerated subdiffusion [59, 63–66].
To extend the possibilities of modeling anoma-
lous diffusion processes diffusion equations with vari-
ous fractional derivatives have been used. We men-
tion here Cattaneo–Hristov diffusion equation with
Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivarive [67–69], Erdelyi–
Kober fractional diffusion equation [70, 71], equa-
tions with Antagana–Baleanu–Caputo and Antagana–
Baleanu–Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives [72,
73], ψ–Hilfer derivatives [74], equations involving frac-
tional derivatives with kernels depending on the Mittag–
Leffler function, the examples are a Wiman type [75] and
a Prabhakar type fractional diffusion equations [76–78],
see also [79–83]. Another generalization of the anoma-
lous diffusion equation is involving of fractional derivative
with respect to another function g(g–fractional deriva-
tive) in the equation [84–87]. Examples are anomalous
diffusion equations with the g–Caputo fractional deriva-
tive with respect to time [88, 89] and to a spatial vari-
able [90]. The subdiffusion equation with fractional g–
Caputo time derivative has recently been used to describe
the transition from ordinary subdiffusion to slow subd-
iffusion [91], the transition between the ordinary subd-
iffusion processes with different subdiffusion parameters
(exponents) [92], and subdiffusion of particles vanishing
over time [93]. The g–subdiffusion equation has been also
used to describe diffusion of colistin molecules in a system
consisting of densely packed gel beads immersed in water
[94]. It has been shown that this process cannot be de-
scribed by the ordinary subdiffusion equation nor normal
diffusion one, but the application of the g–subdiffusion
equation gives good agreement of the experimental and
theoretical results. A more difficult task is to develop a
model that describes the transition between subdiffusion
and superdiffusion, as these processes have a different
interpretations and are described by equations with frac-
tional time derivative and fractional spatial derivative,
respectively.
Changing of a time scale in a diffusion model can lead
to changes in diffusion parameters and/or in the type of
diffusion [13, 91]. A timescale changing can be made by
means of subordinated method [4, 95–99]. It is also gen-
erated by diffusing diffusivities where the diffusion coeffi-
cient evolves over time [97], passages through the layered
media [100], and anomalous diffusion in an expanding
medium [101]. The timescale changing can provide re-
tarding and accelerating anomalous diffusions [102, 103].
In the g–subdiffusion process, the gfunction changes the
time scale with respect to ordinary subdiffusion (assum-
ing that the subdiffusion parameters of both processes
are the same). Contrary to the subordinated method,
for g–subdiffusion a time variable is rescaled by a deter-
ministic function g.
The normal diffusion, ordinary subdiffusion, and frac-
tional superdiffusion equations have been derived from
the standard CTRW model [1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 104].
To derive more general anomalous diffusion equations
from the CTRW model (if possible), further modifica-
tions of CTRW model should be made. The CTRW