Subdiusion equation with fractional Caputo time derivative with respect to another function in modeling transition from ordinary subdiusion to superdiusion Tadeusz Koszto lowicz

2025-05-02 0 0 2.76MB 18 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Subdiffusion equation with fractional Caputo time derivative with respect to another
function in modeling transition from ordinary subdiffusion to superdiffusion
Tadeusz Koszto lowicz
Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University,
Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland
(Dated: March 16, 2023)
We use a subdiffusion equation with fractional Caputo time derivative with respect to another
function g(g–subdiffusion equation) to describe a smooth transition from ordinary subdiffusion to
superdiffusion. Ordinary subdiffusion is described by the equation with the “ordinary” fractional
Caputo time derivative, superdiffusion is described by the equation with a fractional Riesz type
spatial derivative. We find the function gfor which the solution (Green’s function, GF) to the g
subdiffusion equation takes the form of GF for ordinary subdiffusion in the limit of small time and GF
for superdiffusion in the limit of long time. To solve the g–subdiffusion equation we use the g–Laplace
transform method. It is shown that the scaling properties of the GF for g–subdiffusion and the GF for
superdiffusion are the same in the long time limit. We conclude that for a sufficiently long time the
g–subdiffusion equation describes superdiffusion well, despite a different stochastic interpretation
of the processes. Then, paradoxically, a subdiffusion equation with a fractional time derivative
describes superdiffusion. The superdiffusive effect is achieved here not by making anomalously long
jumps by a diffusing particle, but by greatly increasing the particle jump frequency which is derived
by means of the g–continuous time random walk model. The g–subdiffusion equation is shown to be
quite general, it can be used in modeling of processes in which a kind of diffusion change continuously
over time. In addition, some methods used in modeling of ordinary subdiffusion processes, such as
the derivation of local boundary conditions at a thin partially permeable membrane, can be used to
model g–subdiffusion processes, even if this process is interpreted as superdiffusion.
PACS numbers:
I. INTRODUCTION
In the last few decades, various types of diffusion have
been studied experimentally and theoretically. Fractional
differential calculus has been widely used in the theoret-
ical description of anomalous diffusion. The list of cita-
tions related to these issues is very long, as we mention
here [1–15]. Most often, diffusion processes are character-
ized by a time evolution of the mean square displacement
(MSD) of a diffusing particle σ2. If σ2(t)tβ,β(0,1)
corresponds to ordinary subdiffusion, β= 1 to normal
diffusion, and β > 1 to superdiffusion. For ultraslow
diffusion (slow subdiffusion) σ2is controlled by a slowly
varying function which, in practice, is a combination of
logarithmic functions [16, 17]. A more detailed descrip-
tion of diffusion models generating different functions σ2
is in Refs. [18, 19].
Subdiffusion occurs in media in which the movement of
particles is very hindered due to a complex structure of a
medium. The examples are transport of some molecules
in viscoelastic chromatin network [20], porous media [21],
living cells [11], transport of sugars in agarose gel [22],
transport of water in aqueous sucrose glasses [23], and
antibiotics in bacterial biofilm [24, 25]. Subdiffusion can
also occur in a medium with normal diffusion near the
membrane, which retains diffusing molecules for a very
long time [26]. Within the continuous time random walk
Electronic address: tadeusz.kosztolowicz@ujk.edu.pl
(CTRW) model, the distribution ψof waiting time for a
particle to jump ∆thas a heavy tail, ψ(∆t)1/(∆t)α+1
when ∆t→ ∞,α(0,1); the average value of this
time is infinite. The ordinary subdiffusion equation with
the Riemann–Liouville time derivative of the order 1 α
or Caputo fractional time derivative of the order αis
frequently used to describe subdiffusion, then σ2tα.
For superdiffusion, long particle jumps can be performed
with relatively high probability, a jump length distri-
bution λhas a heavy tail, λ(∆x)1/|x|1+γwhen
|x| → ∞; in the following we consider the case of
γ(1,2). The second moment of the jump length is
infinite, the process is described by a differential equa-
tion with a fractional Riesz type derivative of the order γ
with respect to a spatial variable. In this case the CTRW
model provides σ2(t) = κt2, however, κis infinite (see
Eqs. (48) and (49) presented later). Therefore, superdif-
fusion is often defined by the relation σ2(t)t2only
and the prefactor is usually not considered. Examples of
superdiffusion are movement of endogeneous intracellular
particles in some pathogens [27], of soil amebas on plastic
or glass surfaces in liquid media [28], mussels movement
[29], cell migration in some biological processes [30], and
diffusion in random velocity fields [31–34].
Differential equations mentioned above with constant
parameters are used to describe diffusion in a homoge-
neous medium which properties does not change with
time. However, diffusion processes may occur in systems
in which diffusion parameters and even a type of diffu-
sion evolves over time. The type of diffusion depends on
the interaction of diffusing molecules with the environ-
arXiv:2210.11346v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 14 Mar 2023
2
ment and on a structure of the medium, both can change
over time. Anomalous diffusion with evolving anomalous
diffusion exponent has been observed in transport of col-
loidal particles between two parallel plates [35], endoge-
nous lipid granules in living yeast cells [36], microspheres
in a living eukaryotic cell [37] and in bacterial motion
on small beads in a freely suspended soap film [38]. A
change in the diffusion type can occur in the diffusion of
passive molecules in the active bath where moving par-
ticles can affect the movement of passive molecules. Ac-
tive swimmers can enhance diffusion of passive particles
[39]. The change of diffusion of self-propelled particles
and passive particles in an environment with motile mi-
croorgamisms is described in Ref. [40]. Active molecules
can take energy from the environment and use it to make
long jumps. Some diffusing molecules can use chemical
reactions to achieve autonomous propulsion [41]. This
mechanism leads to the process in which σ2evolves much
faster than the linear function of time. The nature of dif-
fusion may also change when the directed movement of a
molecule over short time intervals is disturbed by a ran-
dom change in the direction of the molecule’s movement
due to rotational diffusion.
In intracellular transport in most eukaryotic cells
molecules diffuse through the filament network. When
particle transport is carried out along filaments, the par-
ticles can move ballistically (i.e. with β= 2). However,
changing the orientation and polarization of the filaments
may change the nature of diffusion [42]. Some microor-
ganisms, such as bacteria, move more quickly in more
viscous media. This is because the addition of a viscos-
ity enhancer creates a quasi-rigid network to facilitate
the transport of molecules [43, 44]. Thus, an increase
in viscosity may paradoxically facilitate diffusion. Var-
ious bacterial defense mechanisms against the action of
an antibiotic may hinder but also facilitate the diffusion
of antibiotic molecules in the biofilm [45, 46]. Bacterial
defense abilities evolve over time, which can change dif-
fusion parameters [24, 25].
When the diffusion parameters are not constant, var-
ious equations have been used to describe the diffusion
processes. The examples are subdiffusion equations with
a fractional time derivative of the order depending on
time and/or on a spatial variable [47–58], the superstatis-
tics approach [59] in which certain distribution of diffu-
sion parameters is assumed, subdiffusion equation with
distributed fractional order derivative [60], and with a lin-
ear combination of fractional time derivatives of different
orders where the time evolution of MSD is a linear com-
bination of power functions with different exponents [61].
Diffusion of passive molecules in suspension of eukaryotic
swimming microorganisms is describes by a probability
density function which is a linear combination of Gaus-
sian and exponential Laplace distributions; we mention
that validity of this function has been checked by means
of the scaling method [62]. Distributed order of fractional
derivative in subdiffusion equation can lead to delayed or
accelerated subdiffusion [59, 63–66].
To extend the possibilities of modeling anoma-
lous diffusion processes diffusion equations with vari-
ous fractional derivatives have been used. We men-
tion here Cattaneo–Hristov diffusion equation with
Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivarive [67–69], Erdelyi–
Kober fractional diffusion equation [70, 71], equa-
tions with Antagana–Baleanu–Caputo and Antagana–
Baleanu–Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives [72,
73], ψ–Hilfer derivatives [74], equations involving frac-
tional derivatives with kernels depending on the Mittag–
Leffler function, the examples are a Wiman type [75] and
a Prabhakar type fractional diffusion equations [76–78],
see also [79–83]. Another generalization of the anoma-
lous diffusion equation is involving of fractional derivative
with respect to another function g(g–fractional deriva-
tive) in the equation [84–87]. Examples are anomalous
diffusion equations with the g–Caputo fractional deriva-
tive with respect to time [88, 89] and to a spatial vari-
able [90]. The subdiffusion equation with fractional g
Caputo time derivative has recently been used to describe
the transition from ordinary subdiffusion to slow subd-
iffusion [91], the transition between the ordinary subd-
iffusion processes with different subdiffusion parameters
(exponents) [92], and subdiffusion of particles vanishing
over time [93]. The g–subdiffusion equation has been also
used to describe diffusion of colistin molecules in a system
consisting of densely packed gel beads immersed in water
[94]. It has been shown that this process cannot be de-
scribed by the ordinary subdiffusion equation nor normal
diffusion one, but the application of the g–subdiffusion
equation gives good agreement of the experimental and
theoretical results. A more difficult task is to develop a
model that describes the transition between subdiffusion
and superdiffusion, as these processes have a different
interpretations and are described by equations with frac-
tional time derivative and fractional spatial derivative,
respectively.
Changing of a time scale in a diffusion model can lead
to changes in diffusion parameters and/or in the type of
diffusion [13, 91]. A timescale changing can be made by
means of subordinated method [4, 95–99]. It is also gen-
erated by diffusing diffusivities where the diffusion coeffi-
cient evolves over time [97], passages through the layered
media [100], and anomalous diffusion in an expanding
medium [101]. The timescale changing can provide re-
tarding and accelerating anomalous diffusions [102, 103].
In the g–subdiffusion process, the gfunction changes the
time scale with respect to ordinary subdiffusion (assum-
ing that the subdiffusion parameters of both processes
are the same). Contrary to the subordinated method,
for g–subdiffusion a time variable is rescaled by a deter-
ministic function g.
The normal diffusion, ordinary subdiffusion, and frac-
tional superdiffusion equations have been derived from
the standard CTRW model [1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 104].
To derive more general anomalous diffusion equations
from the CTRW model (if possible), further modifica-
tions of CTRW model should be made. The CTRW
3
model with time distribution ψcontrolled by a three-
parameters Mittag–Leffler function provides the subdif-
fusion equation with the fractional Prabhakar derivative
[105]; the equation describes transition subdiffusion pro-
cess between different subdiffusion exponents. The g
subdiffusion equation can be derived from the modified
CTRW model [106] in which the special definition of con-
volution of functions has been applied.
A frequently used method of analytical solving of diffu-
sion equations with fractional derivatives, apart from the
method of variable separation, is the integral transform
method. For the ordinary subdiffusion equation with
Caputo or Riemann–Liouville time derivatives, the ordi-
nary Laplace transform method is effective. For diffusion
equations with other fractional derivatives, other meth-
ods are more effective. For example, fractional Hilfer–
Prabhakar and Cattaneo–Hristov diffusion equations can
be solved by means of the Elzaki transform method [76].
An effective method for solving the g–subdiffusion equa-
tion is the g–Laplace transform method [91, 106].
Our considerations focus on the transition from sub-
diffusion to superdiffusion. Such a transition has been
observed in dust diffusion in a flowing plasma in the
presence of a moderate magnetic field [107]. Diffu-
sion of molecules, whose movement is limited, when the
strength of the noise changes shows the subdiffusion–
superdiffusion transition [108]. The transition can be fa-
cilitated in a system where both processes coexist. Small
changes in the parameters affecting diffusion, such as
temperature or viscosity, can cause the transition. Simu-
lations show the possibility of coexistence of subdiffu-
sion and superdiffusion in heterogeneous media, espe-
cially near the points where diffusion parameters are dis-
continuous [109]. Diffusion of particles interacting via
Yukava potential in a two dimensional system also shows
both subdiffusive and superdiffusive behaviour with time
varying anomalous diffusion exponent [110]. We men-
tion that the scaling method is helpful for identifying
superdiffusion, see [32, 33, 111–113].
We propose a model of a smooth transition from sub-
diffusion described by the equation with the “ordinary”
fractional Caputo time derivative (hereinafter referred to
as ordinary subdiffusion) to superdiffusion described by
the equation with the fractional Riesz type spatial deriva-
tive (refereed to as fractional superdiffusion). The model
is based on the g–subdiffusion equation with the frac-
tional time Caputo derivative with respect to another
function g. We consider the process in a one-dimensional
homogeneous and isotropic system.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II there
are presented definitions and methods of computing func-
tions describing diffusion, used in further considerations,
in particular the Green function and the function F
which is interpreted as the first passage time distribution
for subdiffusion and quasi-first passage time distribu-
tion for superdiffusion. The ordinary subdiffusion equa-
tion, g–subdiffusion equation, and fractional superdiffu-
sion equation are described in Secs. III, IV, and V, re-
spectively. In Sec. VI we present a model of a smooth
transition from ordinary subdiffusion, described by the
equation with a fractional time derivative, to superdiffu-
sion described by the equation with a fractional spatial
derivative. The process is described by the fractional g
subdiffusion equation with an appropriately chosen func-
tion g. A smooth transition between the processes means
that the Green’s function describing this transition is
smooth, i.e. its derivative exists and is continuous in
the entire domain. The scaling properties of Green’s
function describing the transition process are considered
in Sec. VII. We assume that if the scaling properties
of this function are consistent with the scaling proper-
ties of the Green’s function for fractional superdiffusion,
g–subdiffusion can be treated as superdiffusion. The
stochastic interpretation of the transition process within
the modified CTRW model is discussed in Sec. VIII. Us-
ing this model, the time evolutions of the average jumps
number and the jumps frequency of a diffusing parti-
cle are derived. These functions are used to interpret
the considered g–subdiffusion process. Final remarks are
presented in Sec. IX. Some details of the calculations and
properties of the H–Fox function are shown in Appendix.
II. FUNCTIONS THAT DESCRIBE DIFFUSION
We define the Green’s function Pand the function F
which is the probability distribution of the time that a
particle pass a selected point for first time for ordinary
subdiffusion and g–subdiffusion. Despite interpretation
difficulties, which will be explained later, in further con-
siderations this function is also used for fractional su-
perdiffusion.
The Green’s function is defined here as a solution to a
diffusion equation for the boundary conditions
P(±∞, t|x0) = 0,(1)
and the initial condition
P(x, 0|x0) = δ(xx0),(2)
where δdenotes the delta–Dirac function. The Green’s
function is interpreted as a probability density of finding
a diffusing particle at point xat time t,x0is the initial
particle position. If the molecules diffuse independently
of each other, their concentration C(x, t) at a point xat
time tcan be calculated using the integral formula
C(x, t) = Z
−∞
C(x0,0)P(x, t|x0)dx0,(3)
C(x0,0) is the initial substance concentration. In
unbounded homogeneous system without a bias, the
Green’s function is symmetrical with respect to xx0
and is invariant with translation. Then, the Green’s func-
tion depends on the distance between the points x0and
xonly and can be written as
P(x, t|x0)P(|xx0|, t|0).(4)
4
Due to Eq. (4), the mean value of a particle position
is hxi=R
−∞ xP (x, t|x0)dx =x0and the mean square
displacement (MSD) is
σ2(t)=2Z
0
x2P(x, t|0)dx. (5)
Determination of the first passage time probability
density for ordinary subdiffusion and normal diffusion
is as follows. Let F(t;x0, xM) be a probability density
that the particle located at x0at the initial moment
t= 0 will pass the point xMfirst time at time t; we as-
sume x0< xM. The probability that the particle leaves
the region I= (−∞, xM) first time in the time interval
(t, t + ∆t), where ∆tis assumed to be small, is [114]
F(t;x0, xM)∆t=R(t;x0, xM)R(t+ ∆t;x0, xM),(6)
where R(t;x0, xM) denotes the probability that the par-
ticle would not have passed the point xMby the time
t. The function Rcan be calculated by means of the
formula
R(t;x0, xM) = ZxM
−∞
Pabs(x, t|x0)dx, (7)
where Pabs(x, t|x0) is a probability of finding the particle
in the region Iin a system in which a fully absorbing wall
is located at xM[114]. The commonly used boundary
condition at the absorbing wall is
Pabs(xM, t|x0)=0.(8)
The Green’s function for a system with a fully absorbing
wall can be found by means of the method of images
[96, 115], which for x, x0< xMgives
Pabs(x, t|x0) = P(x, t|x0)P(x, t|2xMx0).(9)
We mention that the method of images has been used to
find the Green’s function in a system with fully absorbing
wall for ordinary subdiffusion [116] and for g–subdiffusion
[93]. From Eqs. (4), (7), and (9) we get
R(t;x0, xM)=2ZxMx0
0
P(x, t|0)dx. (10)
Taking the limit of ∆t0 we obtain for t > 0
F(t;x0, xM) = dR(t;x0, xM)
dt .(11)
From Eqs. (10) and (11) we get
F(t;x0, xM) = 2d
dt ZxMx0
0
P(x, t|0)dx. (12)
For t < 0 we put F(t;x0, xM)0.
The function Fis the first passage time probability
density for ordinary subdiffusion and normal diffusion.
However, for fractional superdiffusion this function does
not satisfy the Sparre-Andersen theorem that for a sym-
metric discrete–time random walk there is F1/n3/2
when n→ ∞, where nis a number of particle jumps
[4, 117, 118]. If the average waiting time for a particle to
jump is finite, which is the case for fractional superdif-
fusion and normal diffusion, then tnand F1/t3/2
when t→ ∞. However, for fractional superdiffusion Eq.
(12) provides F1/t1+1,γ(1,2), in the long time
limit, see Ref. [117–119] and Eq. (51) presented later
in this paper. This result is interpreted that the method
of images is not applicable to fractional superdiffusion.
Since the method provides Eq. (8), the boundary con-
dition at the absorbing wall Eq. (8) is not valid for
fractional superdiffusion [117]. Despite the difficulties
of interpretation, the function Fdefined by Eq. (12)
shows interesting asymptotic properties of the fractional
superdiffusion model and will be used in our consider-
ations. We call it the distribution of quasi-first passage
time for superdiffusion and denote it with the symbol Fγ.
III. ORDINARY SUBDIFFUSION EQUATION
Functions describing ordinary subdiffusion are denoted
by the index α. The ordinary subdiffusion equation of the
order α(0,1) with Caputo fractional time derivative is
CαPα(x, t|x0)
tα=Dα
2Pα(x, t|x0)
x2,(13)
where the ordinary Caputo fractional derivative is de-
fined for α(0,1) as
Cdαf(t)
dtα=1
Γ(1 α)Zt
0
(tu)αf0(u)du, (14)
where f0(u) = df/du, Γ is the Gamma function, and
the subdiffusion coefficient Dαis given in the units of
m2/sα. The solution to Eq. (13) can be find by means
of the ordinary Laplace transform method. The ordinary
Laplace transform
L[f(t)](s) = Z
0
estf(t)dt (15)
has the property
LCdαf(t)
dtα(s) = sαL[f(t)](s)sα1f(0),(16)
when α(0,1). Due to Eq. (16), the ordinary subdiffu-
sion equation in terms of the ordinary Laplace transform
reads
sαL[Pα(x, t|x0)](s)sα1Pα(x, 0|x0) (17)
=Dα
2L[Pα(x, t|x0)](s)
x2.
The solution to Eq. (17) for the boundary conditions
L[Pα(±∞, t|x0)](s) = 0 (see Eq. (1)) and the initial con-
dition Eq. (2) is
L[Pα(x, t|x0)](s) = 1
2Dαs1α/2e−|xx0|qsα
Dα.(18)
摘要:

Subdi usionequationwithfractionalCaputotimederivativewithrespecttoanotherfunctioninmodelingtransitionfromordinarysubdi usiontosuperdi usionTadeuszKosztolowiczInstituteofPhysics,JanKochanowskiUniversity,Uniwersytecka7,25-406Kielce,Poland(Dated:March16,2023)Weuseasubdi usionequationwithfractionalCapu...

展开>> 收起<<
Subdiusion equation with fractional Caputo time derivative with respect to another function in modeling transition from ordinary subdiusion to superdiusion Tadeusz Koszto lowicz.pdf

共18页,预览4页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:18 页 大小:2.76MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 18
客服
关注