Perturbations in the interacting vacuum Albert Munyeshyaka1Joseph Ntahompagaze2Tom Mutabazi1 Manasse.R Mbonye234 Abra- ham Ayirwanda2Fidele Twagirayezu2and Amare Abebe56

2025-05-02 0 0 640.08KB 28 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Perturbations in the interacting vacuum
Albert Munyeshyaka1,Joseph Ntahompagaze2,Tom Mutabazi1, Manasse.R Mbonye2,3,4, Abra-
ham Ayirwanda2,Fidele Twagirayezu 2and Amare Abebe5,6
1Department of Physics, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
2Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Rwanda
3International Center for Theoretical Physics (ICTP)-East African Institute for Fundamental
Research, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
4Rochester Institute of Technology, NY, USA
5Centre for Space Research, North-West University, Mahikeng 2745, South Africa
6National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences (NITheCS), South Africa
Correspondence:munalph@gmail.com
Abstract
In this study, we present the evolution of cosmological perturbations in a universe consisting of
standard matter and interacting vacuum. We use the 1 + 3 covariant formalism in perturba-
tion framework and consider two different models for the interacting vacuum; namely, a linear
interacting model and interaction with creation pressure model. For both models, we derive
the evolution equations governing the growth of linear perturbations for both radiation- and
dust-dominated Universe. We find numerical solutions in appropriate limits, namely long and
short wavelengths. For both models, the perturbations grow with time (decay with redshift),
showing that structure formation is possible in an accelerated cosmic background. The pertur-
bation amplitudes – and their relative scalings with those of ΛCDM – depend on the values of
the interaction parameters considered, and in a way that can be used to constrain the models
using existing and future large-scale structure data. In the vanishing limits of the coupling
parameters of the interaction, we show that standard ΛCDM cosmology, both background and
perturbed, is recovered.
keywords: Cosmology— dark matter— dark energy— interacting vacuum—cosmological constant—
covariant formalism— Cosmological perturbations.
PACS numbers: 04.50.Kd, 98.80.-k, 95.36.+x, 98.80.Cq; MSC numbers: 83F05, 83D05
This manuscript was accepted for publication in International Journal of Geometric Methods
in Modern Physics.
1 Introduction
Recent astronomical data show that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating [1,2]. Differ-
ent hypotheses propose different mechanisms for such a cosmic acceleration, the most prominent
proposal being a certain fluid with negative pressure known as dark energy. Among the widely
explored candidates for dark energy is the cosmological constant Λ [3,4,5], which has now
led to the development of the concordance cosmological model known as ΛCDM dominated by
dark energy. The CDM part of ΛCDM represents [cold] dark matter, another sub-dominant
component of the universe which is invisible in the electromagnetic spectrum but whose effects
can be detected via gravitational interactions. The cosmological constant as the energy of free
1
arXiv:2210.01184v1 [gr-qc] 3 Oct 2022
space (vacuum) suffers from the cosmological constant problem [6,7,8] and the coincidence
problem [9], serious theoretical and observational issues that cannot and should not be ignored.
Since the standard model of cosmology is based on General Relativity (GR), recent studies
tried to propose different modified gravity theories [10].
One possible avenue to addressing the above issues related to the cosmological constant is
treating Λ as some limiting manifestation of an interacting vacuum [11,12,13,14,15]. For
instance in the work done in [14], it was found that one can produce nonsingular cosmology
under the consideration of the interacting vacuum energy, and the cosmological constant ap-
pears as a late-time limiting case of the vacuum energy. In the work done by [15], it was found
that through the consideration of the creation pressure in the continuity equation led to the
situation where the universe experiences quasi-periodic acceleration phases. On the other side,
one finds a detailed exploration of interacting vacuum energy using Planck Data [13].
Different formalism such as metric and the 1 + 3 covariant formalisms can be used to study
cosmological perturbations. The work done in [16] investigated the matter density perturbation
and matter power spectrum in the running vacuum model using metric formalism. In addition
to that, the work done in [17] studied linear scalar perturbations using metric formalism where
they assumed the running vacuum as the sum of independent contributions associated with each
of the matter species. On the other hand, the work done in [18] studied the growth of matter
perturbations in an interacting dark energy scenario emerging from the metric-scalar-torsion
couplings using metric formalism and obtained appropriate fitting formula for the growth in-
dex in terms of the coupling function and the matter density parameters. The works done in
[19,20,21,22] explored the perturbation aspects of interacting vacuum energy. In the work
done by [20,23], the consideration of decaying vacuum was done focusing on the homogeneous
interactions of both matter and dark energy. On the other hand the treatment of generalised
Chaplygin gas models as inhomogeneous interacting dark energy with matter was done in [21]
focusing on cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. In [22], the authors investi-
gated perturbations of interacting vacuum focusing on the contributions of gravitational waves
data, where they found a significant improvement in the CMB measurements.
The present paper aims to apply the 1 + 3 covariant and gauge-invariant perturbations for-
malism to study large-scale structure formation scenarios for two interacting vacuum models
treated in the works by Bruni et al [14] and Mbonye [15]. The 1 + 3 covariant gauge-invariant
formalism is used to study cosmological perturbations for both GR and modified gravity theo-
ries such as f(R), f(T) and f(G). In the 1 + 3 covariant formalism, the perturbation variables
defined describe true physical degrees of freedom and no unphysical modes exist.
The rest of this paper is organised as follows: in Sec. 2we give a covariant description and
the general linearised field equations involving the interacting dynamical vacuum. In Sec. 3we
define the covariant perturbation variables, derive their evolution equations and analyse their
solutions. Finally in Sec. 4we discuss the results and give conclusions.
Natural units in which c= 8πG = 1 will be used throughout this paper, indices like a,b...
run from 1 to 3 and Greek indices run from 0 to 3. The symbols ,˜
and the overdot .rep-
resent the usual covariant derivative, the spatial covariant derivative, and differentiation with
respect to cosmic time, respectively. We use the (+ ++) spacetime signature.
2
2 Background Field Equations
The standard GR gravitational action with a matter field contribution to the Lagrangian, Lm,
is given by
A=1
2Zd4xg[R+ 2Lm].(1)
Using the variational principle of least action with respect to the metric gab, the generalised
Einstein Field Equations (EFEs) can be given in a compact form as
Gab =Tab ,(2)
with the first (geometric) term represented by the Einstein tensor, and energy-momentum
tensor of matter fluid forms given by
Tab =µuaub+phab +qaub+qbua+πab ,(3)
where µ,p,qaand πab are the energy density, isotropic pressure, heat flux and anisotropic
pressure of the fluid, respectively. Here uadxa
dt is the 4-velocity of fundamental observers
comoving with the fluid. In a multi-component fluid universe filled with standard matter fields
(dust, radiation, etc) and vacuum contributions, the total energy density, isotropic pressures
and heat flux are given, respectively, by ρ=ρm+ρv,p=pm+pvand qa=qa
m+qa
v, where
mand vspecify matter and vacuum respectively. The vacuum equation of state parameter w
is given by w=1. An arbitrary energy transfer Qcan reproduce an arbitrary background
cosmology with energy density [11,24]
ρ=ρm+V , (4)
p=V , (5)
which reduces to ΛCDM when Q= 0 and we have a constant V= Λ. The 4-vector Qµcan in
general be decomposed into parallel and orthogonal parts to the 4-velocity of the fluid
Qa=Qua+qa,(6)
where qahere is due to momentum exchange between matter and vacuum. In this paper, we
will assume an homogeneous isotropic model in which Qais parallel to the matter 4-velocity,
Qa=Qua. We will consider the case where the interactions reduce to pure energy exchange
so that qa= 0 [13,20,25]. Moreover for each interacting fluid, the following conservation
equations considered in [11,19,26] hold:
˙ρ+ 3(1 + ω)Hρ =Q , (7)
˙
V=Q . (8)
The equation of state for the standard matter (such as dust and radiation) component is
presented as p=wρ, where wis constant, and the total thermodynamic quantities p=pm+
pvand ρ=ρm+ρvwhere the subscripts mand vstand for standard matter and vacuum
contributions. We define two different covariant choices for Qas follows: the first one considered
by Bruni et al [14], hereafter referred to as Case 1, and the second by Mbonye [15], hereafter
referred to as Case 2:
Q1= [ξ(VΛV) + σρ]θ , (9)
Q2=πcθ , (10)
3
with πc=K[(3γ2)ρm2ρv]. ξ,σ,Kand γare dimensionless coupling parameters and VΛ
plays the role of an effective cosmological constant, and γ= 1 + w. Note that throughout the
remainder of the paper, we refer to Case 1 when using the interaction form Q1and Case 2 when
using Q2.
Consider a spatially flat FRW universe with the metric
ds2=dt2+a(t)2(dx2+dy2+dz2),(11)
where the Friedman and the Raychaudhuri equations for flat spacetime are given respectively
by
H2˙a
a2
=1
3(ρ+V),(12)
˙
H=H21
6[(1 + 3w)ρ2V],(13)
where θ= 3H,H˙a
ais the Hubble expansion rate, and a(t) is the cosmological scale factor.
We dedicate the next subsections to analyse some of the cosmological solutions (in terms of
the solutions for Hubble expansion and the deceleration parameters) to help us explain cosmic
history of the late-time background due to the presence of the interacting vacuum, compared
against the ΛCDM model.
2.1 Background expansion for Case 1
We now consider linear models [14] presented by:
ρ=E1aα1+E2aα2,(14)
V=VΛ+λ1aα1+λ2aα2,(15)
where E1,E2,λ1and λ2are energy contributions of the universe. Equation 12 can be repre-
sented as
H2=1
3(E1aα1+E2aα2+VΛ+λ1aα1+λ2aα2).(16)
We can make change of variable and use redshift transformation as the redshift is a physically
measurable quantity. Using a=1
1+z, here we assume a present value of scale factor to be 1, eq.
16 is transformed as
h1(z) = p(Ω1+ Ω3)(1 + z)α1+ (Ω2+ Ω4)(1 + z)α2+ ΩΛ,(17)
where Ω1=E1
3H2
0, Ω2=E2
3H2
0, Ω3=λ1
3H2
0, Ω4=λ2
3H2
0, ΩΛ=VΛ
3H2
0and h=H
H0.
The total fractional density parameter for a flat universe today is given by
1+ Ω2+ Ω3+ Ω4+ ΩΛ= 1.(18)
The deceleration parameter qis defined as
q=¨aa
˙a2,(19)
4
Figure 1: A plot of the normalised Hubble parameter, h(z) versus redshift, zfor eq. 17.
which can be re-written (in redshift space) as
q(z) = 1 + (1 + z)h0
h,(20)
where prime means derivative with respect to redshift z. The deceleration parameter in our
case is presented as
q1(z) = 1 + (Ω1+ Ω3)α1(1 + z)α1+ (Ω2+ Ω4)α2(1 + z)α2
2h2
1.(21)
Numerical results of normalised Hubble parameter (eq. 17) and deceleration parameter (eq.
21) are presented in Figs. 1and 2, respectively.
5
摘要:

PerturbationsintheinteractingvacuumAlbertMunyeshyaka1,JosephNtahompagaze2,TomMutabazi1,Manasse.RMbonye2;3;4,Abra-hamAyirwanda2,FideleTwagirayezu2andAmareAbebe5;61DepartmentofPhysics,MbararaUniversityofScienceandTechnology,Mbarara,Uganda2DepartmentofPhysics,CollegeofScienceandTechnology,UniversityofR...

展开>> 收起<<
Perturbations in the interacting vacuum Albert Munyeshyaka1Joseph Ntahompagaze2Tom Mutabazi1 Manasse.R Mbonye234 Abra- ham Ayirwanda2Fidele Twagirayezu2and Amare Abebe56.pdf

共28页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:28 页 大小:640.08KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-02

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 28
客服
关注