
4
for mj. The occupation of the state is Nκ, which within
the shell model picture is also 2j+ 1.
To make approximations to the hadron current clear, it
is instructive to first consider the most general expression
for the single-nucleon current in momentum space
Jν=1
(2π)3/2Zdp0
NZdp0
πψsN(p0
N,kN)φ∗(p0
π,kπ)
Oν(qµ, p0
N, p0
π, p0
m)ψmj
κ(p0
m=p0
N+p0
π−q).(13)
Here ψsN(p0
N,kN) and φ∗(p0
π,kπ) are the outgoing nu-
cleon and pion wavefunctions. These have fixed asymp-
totic momenta kNand kπrespectively, and are func-
tions of the primed momenta p0
Nand p0
π. The bound
state wavefunction is ψκ, and the projections of spin and
angular momentum of the bound state are denoted by
superscripts sNand mjrespectively.
The outgoing nucleon and pion are energy eigen-
states, their asymptotic momenta ksatisfy the relation
E2=k2+M2. In the nuclear interior the particles are
not momentum-eigenstates, a momentum operator act-
ing on the wavefunctions yields the primed momenta. In
Eq. (13) the transition operator is hence a function of
the primed momenta, these are related by momentum
conservation q+p0
m=p0
π+p0
N.
The full expression of Eq. (13) is computationally ex-
pensive, one has to compute nκ(2j+ 1) 6-dimensional
integrals for every point in the 8 dimensional phase
space. Moreover singularities can arise in the pole terms,
e.g. in pion exchange contributions, as in general p026=
k2=E2−M2. The singularities can be avoided by
using as energy of outgoing nucleon and pion in the
operator the energy derived from the primed momenta
E→E02=p02+M[31]. In this work we make an approx-
imation to the full expression by replacing the primed
momenta in the operator (but only in the operator) by
their asymptotic values
Oµ(q, p0
m, p0
N, p0
π)→ Oµ(q, pm, kN, kπ),(14)
with pm≡kπ+kN−q. We refer to this as the asymp-
totic approximation, sometimes called the local approxi-
mation [31], as it removes derivatives with respect to the
coordinates in r-space expressions. We are aware of a
limited number of calculations that use the full expres-
sion of Eq. (13), these where performed for fully exclusive
conditions for knockout from a specific shell in photon-
induced reactions [31,32]. These works seem to imply
that the full calculation leads to a slightly more smeared
out cross section, in particular for angular distributions,
compared to the asymptotic approximation. We plan to
utilize the full calculation, and investigate ambiguities in
the transition operator in future works.
With Eq. (14) one can reduce the expression of Eq. (13)
to a single 3-dimensional integral. If one writes the
momentum-space wavefunctions as the Fourier transform
of their coordinate space counterparts one can immedi-
ately perform the integrals over the primed momenta,
and momentum conservation leads to
Jν=Zdreiq·rφ∗(r,kπ)ψsN(r,kN)Oνψmj
κ(r).(15)
We will in this work always treat the pion as a plane
wave, the final expression for the current in the RDWIA
used in this work is then given by
Jν=Zdrei(q−kπ)·rψsN(r,kN)Oνψmj
κ(r).(16)
It is clear that Eq. (15) allows to include a distorted
pion wavefunction without significant increase of compu-
tational cost compared to Eq. (16). Instead, the problem
is to find a suitable potential to treat the pion wave-
function. Empirical and microscopic optical potentials
derived from fits to pion-nucleus elastic scattering are
available, but in these treatments any inelastic rescatter-
ing of the pion leads to a loss of flux. Such potentials are
suitable to describe the process under exclusive condi-
tions, in which the missing energy of the residual system
is restricted to a narrow region. In neutrino experiments
such conditions are not met, instead certain rescattering
mechanisms (e.g. absorption) will lead to a reduction of
the signal, others (e.g. secondary nucleon knockout) do
not, and charge exchange reactions migrate pions from
one production channel to another. As such, an opti-
cal potential informed by elastic pion-nucleus scattering
would underestimate the total rates in the context of
neutrino scattering experiments. Contrary to this, the
results in which the pion is described by a plane wave in
most cases should be expected to overestimate rates in
neutrino experiments.
The nucleon states are scattering solutions of the
Dirac equation with the real Energy-Dependent RMF
(EDRMF) potential introduced in Ref. [19]. The
EDRMF potential is constructed by scaling the RMF
scalar and vector potentials as a function of the nucleon
energy, thereby implementing a softening of the poten-
tial with increasing energy. At low energies the potential
is identical to the RMF potential used to compute the
bound state wavefunctions, thereby the orthogonality of
initial and final states is ensured when the momentum
content of bound and scattering state could potentially
overlap. This ensures specifically that the Pauli principle
is satisfied [39]. At high energies, cross sections computed
with the EDRMF are similar to those obtained with the
real part of optical potentials constrained by nucleon-
nucleus scattering as shown in Ref. [41]. We consider
the EDRMF potential suitable to describe interactions
in which the outgoing nucleon remains undetected (or
is not used in the definition of the experimental signal),
as is the case in neutrino induced pion production cross
sections that we consider.
To gauge the effect of nucleon distortion we compare
the RDWIA calculations with the relativistic plane-wave
impulse approximation (RPWIA) where the final state
nucleon is described by a plane wave. In this case the
asymptotic evaluation of the operator, Eq. (14), is of