
2 YEUK HAY JOSHUA LAM
For such a local system L, the work of Drinfeld, which was later general-
ized to arbitrary rank by Lafforgue, implies that there is a unique number
field Fand an embedding σ:F −→ Qℓsuch that σ(F) is the field generated
by the traces of Frobenii at closed points of C. We refer to Fas the trace
field of L, and denote by F(L(¯
C, Z)) the set of trace fields of local systems
in L(¯
C, Z). It is natural to wonder about the distribution of such trace
fields; our first main result is the following boundedness statement.
Theorem 1.2. Fix a pair (g, n). Let Fg,n :=S¯
C,Z,q F(L(¯
C, Z)) be the set
of trace fields of local systems in L(¯
C, Z), as (¯
C, Z)and qvary over all
pointed curves of type (g, n)and powers of p, respectively. Then, for any
integer d, there are only finitely many fields in Fg,n with degree ≤dand
which are unramified at p.
Remark 1.3. It is also straightforward to see that, if we fix the trace field
Fand the pointed curve ( ¯
C, Z)/Fqas in Theorem 1.2, then only finitely
many elements of Sq′L(¯
CFq′, ZFq′) have trace field F, where ( ¯
CFq′, ZFq′)
denotes the basechange to Spec(Fq′). On the other hand, it is possible to
have a positive dimensional family of curves, all of which admit rank two
local systems with the same trace field; this can be ruled out in certain
special cases, as is done in [Lam22].
We now state a result where the characteristic pis allowed to vary. For
this purpose, for a pointed curve ( ¯
C, Z)/Fqin characteristic p, we write
Lp(¯
C, Z) for L(¯
C, Z) to emphasize the characteristic of the base field.
Theorem 1.4. There are only finitely many fields in Sp, ¯
C,Z F(Lp(¯
C, Z)) of
degree dand completely split at p.
The heuristic in the next section leads us to expect that Theorem 1.2
should hold without the unramified-at-passumption, and Theorem 1.4 should
hold without the splitness condition, though we are not able to prove these:
indeed, our method to bound the degree of the Hodge bundle uses partial
Hasse invariants, and the obtained bounds depend on the prime pif the
field is not totally split at p. In another direction, one can try to remove
the infinite monodromy condition in the definition of L(¯
C, Z): the main
obstruction here is that such local systems are not known to come from
abelian varieties, or some other family of varieties with a “uniform” de-
scription: instead, they are known to arise in the cohomology of moduli of
shtukas, whose geometry depends heavily on ¯
Cand q.
1.5. Context. Our work is motivated by Maeda’s conjecture in the function
field setting. For example, for each curve ( ¯
C, Z)/Fqof type (g, n) = (0,4),
computations of Kontsevich [Kon09, §0.1] shows that, in almost all cases,
there are four trace fields, each of degree roughly (q+1)/41. This contributes
to the Maeda philosophy that, generically, trace fields should be as large as
1the splitting into four fields comes from the Atkin-Lehner operators