Absence of a BCS-BEC crossover in the cuprate superconductors John Sous1Yu He2and Steven A. Kivelson1 1Department of Physics Stanford University Stanford California 94305 USA

2025-04-30 0 0 3.08MB 9 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Absence of a BCS-BEC crossover in the cuprate superconductors
John Sous,1, Yu He,2, and Steven A. Kivelson1,
1Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
2Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
(Dated: October 16, 2023)
We examine key aspects of the theory of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) to Bose-Einstein
condensation (BEC) crossover, focusing on the temperature dependence of the chemical potential,
µ. We identify an accurate method of determining the change of µin the cuprate high temperature
superconductors from angle-resolved-photoemission data (along the ‘nodal’ direction), and show that
µvaries by less than a few percent of the Fermi energy over a range of temperatures from far below
to several times above the superconducting transition temperature, Tc. This shows, unambiguously,
that not only are these materials always on the BCS side of the crossover (which is a phase transition
in the d-wave case), but are nowhere near the point of the crossover (where the chemical potential
approaches the band bottom).
INTRODUCTION
The zero temperature (T) superfluid density, ns(0),
of the cuprate high temperature superconductors is sev-
eral orders of magnitude smaller than that of conven-
tional superconductors [1–3]. Indeed (when translated
into energy units) it is comparable to the critical tran-
sition temperature (Tc) [3]. This has led to the proba-
bly inescapable inference that Tc, itself, is determined,
at least to a significant degree, by the condensation scale
(i.e. the phase ordering temperature, Tθns(0)), rather
than by the pairing scale (0/2), in contrast to the
case in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory of
conventional superconductors. There is also compelling
evidence that some degree of clearly identifiable super-
conducting fluctuations - colloquially referred to as ‘pair-
ing without phase coherence’ - persists for a substantial
range (at least 20% or so) above Tc[4–14]. This has
been known for some time for the underdoped cuprates,
but it has recently become increasingly clear that the
same is true for many or all overdoped cuprates as well
(Fig. 1) [8, 13, 15]. Indeed, as a function of doping, the
onset temperature (however defined) of superconducting
fluctuations more closely parallels Tcthan it does the
conventionally defined pseudo-gap crossover.
However, what is unclear is why this occurs, and what
we should learn from this. One proposal is that this
should be taken as evidence that the system is approach-
ing a strong pairing situation, referred to as the Bose-
Einstein condensation (BEC) limit, in which the elec-
trons form non-overlapping charge 2ebosons at a scale
far above Tc[16–27]. However, as we will discuss be-
low, there are other conceptually distinct, yet equally
well understood circumstances in which Tcis determined
by phase ordering and in which Cooper pairing persists
above Tc. The purpose of this work is to analyze the
behavior that would be expected of a system either in
the BEC limit or approaching the BCS to BEC crossover
from the BCS side, and to present direct experimental
evidence that this is not the case for the cuprates.
FRAMING THE ISSUE
BCS theory is a weak coupling theory that is built on a
starting point that is the electronic structure from band
theory. The BEC limit invokes electronic bound states.
In the former case, the pairing is highly collective and
the chemical potential, µ, is only weakly affected by the
advent of pairing. In the latter, the chemical potential
- by the definition of a bound state - must approach a
value that lies below the band bottom as T0. These
differences do not refer to subtle low-energy phenomena
but rather to entirely different regimes of microscopic
physics on energy scales of the order of the Fermi energy,
EF, or larger [32].
From this perspective, the fact that the Fermi surface
and general features of the electron dispersion seen in
ARPES experiments across the superconducting dome
of the cuprates are more or less in agreement with expec-
tations from band-structure calculations appears to be
inconsistent with any large excursions toward the BEC
limit. (This is illustrated in Fig. 2.) Emergent features
of the low energy physics, such as a normal state pseudo-
gap that competes with superconductivity (apparent be-
low some generally relatively ill-defined T) [7, 33–39]
and various low energy kinks in the dispersion relations
are certainly interesting and important, but occur on en-
ergy scales small compared to EF[40–43]. The fact that
the application of magnetic fields large enough to quench
superconductivity produces quantum oscillations [44] is
further evidence that pairing is a collective property of
the superconducting state rather than a microscopic fea-
ture associated with bound-state formation [45].
One important feature of the superconducting state in
the cuprates is that it has d-wave symmetry and gap-
less, nodal quasi-particle excitations [46]. There can
be no nodal quasi-particles in the BEC limit. (See
Ref. [47].) Thus, for this d-wave case, the BCS to BEC
crossover [24, 26] would constitute a (Lifshitz) phase
transition from a nodal to a nodeless state [47, 48]. The
existence of well defined nodes is, of itself, proof that
arXiv:2210.13478v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 12 Oct 2023
2
120
100
80
60
40
20
Temperature (K)
0.250.200.150.100.05
Doping (x)
Torque magne�za�on
THz conduc�vity onset
Tc LSCO films
Specific heat
Tc LSCO crystals
0
Paraconduc�vity
THz conduc�ivty onset
0.250.200.150.100.05
Doping (p)
Specific heat
Nernst
Torque magne�za�on
ARPES AN
ARPES NN
100
Temperature (K)
0
200
300
La2-xSrxCuO4Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ
(a) (b)
Paraconduc�vity
Tc
“universal” parabola
FIG. 1. Cuprates phase diagram. Phase diagram of two representative cuprates, (a) La2xSrxCuO4(LSCO) and (b)
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ(Bi-2212), as a function of doped hole concentration and temperature. Open black markers indicate Tcfor
bulk crystals, while the solid black line is the same for crystalline films from Ref. [10]. The other symbols indicate crossover
lines below which the existence of significant superconducting fluctuations are inferred from various different experiments that
are directly sensitive to Cooper pair formation. Data, including error bars where applicable, are reproduced from Refs. [4–
10, 28–31]. The quantitative identification of any crossover depends on the criterion used, and moreover distinct probes should
have different sensitivity to superconducting correlations, so it is reasonable that the various lines do not coincide.
the cuprates are on the BCS side of the transition. This
leaves only the question of how far on the BCS side they
are from the point at which a BCS to BEC transition
would have occurred [49]. In the language of effective
field theories, the question we consider is not one con-
cerning the correct infra-red description (i.e. phases of
matter) but rather concerns the ultra-violet (high energy
‘microscopic’) description consistent with experimental
data.
EXPERIMENTAL PERSPECTIVE
We will focus our attention on the behavior of the
chemical potential, µ, as this is a fundamental thermo-
dynamic quantity that exhibits qualitatively different be-
havior in the two limits. Since by definition, in the BEC
limit the chemical potential is below the band bottom,
on approach to the BEC limit from the BCS side one
should see that the chemical potential is significantly de-
pressed from its band theory value toward the bottom of
the band. Moreover, it should show strong Tdependen-
cies for temperatures of order Tc.
A number of fortuitous features of the electronic struc-
ture of the cuprates make it possible to stringently bound
the evolution of the chemical potential from the electron
dispersion measured in ARPES along the ‘nodal direc-
tion’ in the Brillouin zone. Specifically, it is possible to
determine the value of the Fermi momentum, kF=|
kF|,
as a function of temperature with a high degree of pre-
cision. In the superconducting state, since the gap van-
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
E - E
F
(eV)
-1.5
-2.0
X
Bi-2212
E
F
ΓΜ
X
-0.2
0.0
E - EF (eV)
ΓΜX
p = 0.22
(a)
(b)
(c) LSCO
Γ
X
DFT
x = 0.23 p = 0.22
Bi-2212
FIG. 2. Electronic structure of Bi-based cuprates
along high symmetry directions. (a) Schematic Fermi
surface and momentum cut trajectory in the tetragonal Bril-
louin zone of a CuO2plane. (b) Low energy electronic struc-
ture near (π,0) in Bi-2212 (p = 0.22, Tc= 66 K) in the
normal state. Data are reproduced from Ref. [8]. (c) Elec-
tronic structure along Γ Xdirection in LSCO (x= 0.23,
Tc= 24 K) and Bi-2212. Light green lines are density func-
tional theory (DFT) calculated band structure. For Bi-2212
only the antibonding band is shown. Deviations from the first
principles dispersion apparent at low energies represent mass
renormalization due to additional interaction effects, see Sup-
plementary Note 9. Data are adapted from Refs. [8, 50–52].
摘要:

AbsenceofaBCS-BECcrossoverinthecupratesuperconductorsJohnSous,1,∗YuHe,2,†andStevenA.Kivelson1,‡1DepartmentofPhysics,StanfordUniversity,Stanford,California94305,USA2DepartmentofAppliedPhysics,YaleUniversity,NewHaven,Connecticut06511,USA(Dated:October16,2023)WeexaminekeyaspectsofthetheoryoftheBardeen-...

展开>> 收起<<
Absence of a BCS-BEC crossover in the cuprate superconductors John Sous1Yu He2and Steven A. Kivelson1 1Department of Physics Stanford University Stanford California 94305 USA.pdf

共9页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:9 页 大小:3.08MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-30

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 9
客服
关注