
2 M. MARENGON, A. N. MILLER, A. RAY, AND A. I. STIPSICZ
The CP2-genus was previously studied by [Yas91,Yas92,AN09,Pic19]. Specifically, Yasuhara [Yas91,
Yas92] studied the sliceness of certain torus knots in CP2. Pichelmeyer [Pic19] studied the CP2-genus for
low crossing knots and alternating knots. Ait Nouh showed in [AN09] that for 3 ≤q≤17,
gCP2(T2,q) = g4(T2,q )−1 = q−3
2,
and asked whether the equality
gCP2(Tp,q) = g4(Tp,q )−1 = (p−1)(q−1)
2−1
holds for all p, q > 0. Theorem 2.8 shows that this is not the case, and yields the following corollary.
Corollary 1.3. For every n≥1,
gCP2(Tn,n−1)≤(g4(Tn,n−1)−n−2
2if n≡0 mod 2
g4(Tn,n−1)−n−1
2if n≡1 mod 2.
Indeed the above inequality holds for the least genus of null-homologous surfaces bounded by Tn,n−1,
as we indicate in the proof.
1.2. Relative minimal genus problems in other 4-manifolds. Given a closed, smooth 4-manifold
M, let M×denote the punctured manifold M∖˚
B4. The M-genus of a knot K⊆S3, denoted by gM(K),
generalizes the definition of Equation (1.1) and is defined as
gM(K) = min{g(Σ) |i: Σ →M×, i(∂Σ) = K},
where the minimum is taken over all smooth, compact, orientable, properly embedded surface Σ ⊆M×
bounded by K⊆∂M×∼
=S3. A knot Kis said to be slice in Mif gM(K) = 0. One may also consider
the topological M-genus, denoted by gtop
M(K), the least genus of a surface Fas above which is only locally
flat and embedded. Note that gM(K)≤gS4(K) and gtop
M(K)≤gtop
S4(K) for all M.
The smooth and topological S4-genera correspond to the usual smooth and topological slice genera
of knots and have been studied extensively. In particular, there exist infinitely many knots with trivial
topological S4-genus and nontrivial smooth S4-genus [Gom86,End95]. Any such knot can be used to
produce a nonstandard smooth structure on R4[Gom85] and in general slicing knots in S4is connected to
major open questions in 4-manifold topology, such as the smooth Poincar´e conjecture and the topological
surgery conjecture [FGMW10,CF84] (see also [KOPR21]). Slicing knots in more general 4-manifolds
has also been fruitful, e.g. in revealing structure within the knot concordance group [COT03,COT04,
CT07,CHL09,CHL11], and in distinguishing between smooth concordance classes of topologically slice
knots [CHH13,CH15,CK21]. In [MMP20] it was shown that the set of knots which bound smooth, null-
homologous disks in a 4-manifold Mcan distinguish between smooth structures on M, that is, there are
examples of homeomorphic smooth 4-manifolds M1, M2and a knot K⊂S3which bounds a smooth,
null-homologous disk in M×
1, but does not bound such a disk in M×
2. It is an open question whether the
set of slice knots can distinguish between smooth structures on a manifold.
It was shown in [KPRT22, Corollary 1.12] using Freedman’s disk embedding theorem [Fre82,FQ90]
that gtop
M(K) = 0 for every closed, simply connected 4-manifold Mother than S4,CP2,CP2,∗CP2,
and ∗CP2. Here Mdenotes the 4-manifold Mwith its orientation reversed, and ∗CP2is the topological
4-manifold homotopy equivalent, but not homeomorphic, to CP2, constructed by Freedman in [Fre82].
As mentioned before, gtop
CP2(K)≤1 for every knot K. Moreover, gtop
∗CP2(K)≤1 for every knot Kas well.
Further, gtop
CP2(K) = gtop
CP2(−K) for every knot K, where −Kis the mirror image. Therefore, the topological
problem for closed, simply connected 4-manifolds with positive second Betti number is better understood.
By contrast, many open questions remain in the smooth setting. It is a straightforward consequence of the
Norman trick that all knots in S3are slice in both S2×S2and S2e
×S2∼
=CP2#CP2[Nor69, Corollary 3 and
Remark; Suz69, Theorem 1] (see also [Ohy94,Liv21]). By Theorem 1.1 the CP2-genus can be arbitrarily
large. It is open whether there is a knot that is not slice in the K3-surface – if such a knot exists, its
unknotting number must be more than 21 [MM22].
1.3. Minimal genus problem in CP2#CP2.Above we provided a possible extension of the Thom
conjecture from CP2to (CP2)×, by replacing closed surfaces with surfaces having boundary knotted in
S3=∂(CP2)×. Another extension of Kronheimer-Mrowka’s seminal result on GCP2would be the deter-
mination of the corresponding function for other closed 4-manifolds, for example GCP2#CP2of CP2#CP2.
(The cases of CP2#CP2and S2×S2were resolved by Ruberman in [Rub96].) Gauge-theoretic methods
are less effective for this 4-manifold – the lower bounds, resting on variants of Furuta’s 10
8-theorem, from