
therein). In general terms, when studying infectious diseases, mathematical models help under-
stand disease transmission dynamics. Furthermore, mathematical models, in some cases, can
provide insight to health authorities to construct and develop efficient public health policies [8].
Modeling social interactions as epidemic processes can provide a helpful understanding of the
phenomenon studied. Here, we model addiction as an infectious disease where the interactions
between the non-addicted and addicted individuals can cause an “epidemic” process and confer
an “infection”. Drug addiction has been a problem worldwide for many decades [14, 19, 3]. In
particular, when the crack “epidemic” of the 1980s was in full force, the derivative of cocaine, a
more pure and more expensive narcotic, led to a faster addiction and deterioration of individuals
that consumed the drug [10, 7].
Furthermore, relapse rates of addicted individuals, especially those that used potent narcotics
such as crack cocaine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and heroin, among others, are very high [15,
13]. In the model constructed here, we looked at nonlinear relapse rates and the influence of those
who recovered and want to provide support for non-addicted presumed susceptible individuals.
This is done via a general function that depends on the temporarily recovered population and
other parameters.
Epidemic models have helped describe transmission dynamics of infectious pathogens and
derive strategies for their control, prevention, and reduction of incidence, among others. Here, we
provide a theoretical framework to study social phenomena studied via an epidemic model and
highlight the sensitivity of initial conditions.
The article is organized as follows: in Section 2, we give details of the mathematical model.
In Section 3, we present the mathematical analysis. In Section 4, we provide a stochastic version
of the model and provide some numerical examples. Finally, in Section 5, we provide a discussion
based on our results.
2 Mathematical Model
The model we consider is based on [17], where authors explored the impact of nonlinear influence
on drinking behavior dynamics. In our model, we consider three compartments: susceptible
individuals (S), addicted individuals (A), and temporarily reformed individuals ( ˜
S). The model
transitions follow the typical SIR model [2, 12].
The recruitment rate, β, represents the strength of social influence on susceptible (at-risk)
individuals. In this context, transmission is a collective behavior rather than an individual con-
sequence; i.e., recruitment is not typically the work of a single individual, but instead is a result
of the collective influence of a group of individuals as a whole [6]. Moreover, κ∈[0,1] denotes
the cost of addiction, and ν∈[0,1] is the willingness of reformed individuals to deter at-risk
individuals from addiction. We then consider a positive, strictly decreasing smooth function g
defined by:
gκ,ν (˜
S) = κ
1 + ν˜
S
N
,(1)
which is a reducing factor that impacts transitions from Sto A. The function grepresents the
impact of reformed individuals in the at-risk population. Here, high values of νimply that a large
proportion of the reformed class is helping the susceptible population, considered at-risk.
The relapse of the reformed population is possible through interactions with individuals in
the addicted class considered infectious, which refers to conditions that possibly spread through
a strong collective social component. In our model, individuals can temporarily recover at rate γ
and transition into the susceptible (at-risk) class ( ˜
S). Rehabilitation programs have the potential
to use the social influence of reformed individuals to deter at-risk individuals from relapse. How-
ever, reformed individuals typically encounter environmental pressures that may lead to relapse.
2