
1/f noise from the sequence of nonoverlapping rectangular pulses
Aleksejus Kononovicius∗
, Bronislovas Kaulakys
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University
Abstract
We analyze the power spectral density of a signal composed of nonoverlapping rectangular pulses. First,
we derive a general formula for the power spectral density of a signal constructed from the sequence of
nonoverlapping pulses. Then we perform a detailed analysis of the rectangular pulse case. We show that
pure 1/f noise can be observed until extremely low frequencies when the characteristic pulse (or gap)
duration is long in comparison to the characteristic gap (or pulse) duration, and gap (or pulse) durations
are power–law distributed. The obtained results hold for the ergodic and weakly nonergodic processes.
1 Introduction
Flicker noise, also 1/f noise or pink noise, is a phenomenon well–known for almost a century since it was first
observed by Johnson in a vacuum tube experiment [1, 2]. Since then power–law scaling in the power spectral
density of 1/fβform (with 0.5.β.1.5) has been reported in different experiments and empirical data sets
across varied fields of research [3–7], and, especially, in solids [8–10]. One of the peculiarities of 1/f noise is
that it is observed for low frequencies and no cutoff frequency has been observed in many cases, e.g., 300 years’
worth of weather data [11] or a three–week experiment with semiconductors [12], no cutoff frequency has been
observed [13]. In other cases, the cutoff frequency can be observed [14–16], but 1/f noise is still observed over
a broad range of frequencies.
Given observations in various research fields, one would expect that a general explanation of 1/f noise is
due. However, even after almost a century after discovery, there is no generally accepted model of 1/f noise.
There are numerous different modeling approaches some of them based on actual physical mechanisms within
the systems in question, while some approaches aspire to provide a more general explanation. Mathematical
literature is rich in true long–range memory models, such as fractional Brownian motion [17], ARCH family
models [18], and ARFIMA models [19]. In physics literature one most commonly will see 1/f noise being
obtained by appropriately summing Lorentzian spectra as in the McWorther model [20, 21]. Self–organized
criticality framework was also put forward as a possible explanation [22], as well as the memoryless nonlinear
response [23]. Our group has built various nonlinear stochastic processes to model 1/f noise in a variety of
scenarios and different modeling frameworks: autoregressive inter–event time point processes [21,24], stochastic
differential equations [25,26] and agent–based models [27]. For a detailed review of works by our group see [28].
Our group, as well as others, have observed that nonlinear transformations of Markovian stochastic processes
can lead to spurious long–range memory processes [29–32]. These are completely different approaches as the
true long–range memory models rely on nonlocal operators, while the models exhibiting spurious long–range
memory rely on locally nonlinear potentials, which often result in nonergodic or nonstationary behavior.
Here we will consider a different model, one which is not affected by the nonlinear transformations of amplitude
and thus reproduces 1/f noise not due to fluctuations in amplitude but due to temporal dynamics. The
approach we take here is most similar to renewal theory models [33], and random telegraph noise models, as we
∗email: aleksejus.kononovicius@tfai.vu.lt; website: http://kononovicius.lt
1
arXiv:2210.11792v5 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 14 Mar 2023