2
1. Introduction
Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have been increasingly explored due to several useful
characteristics, such as atomically small thickness and large spin-orbit coupling, which promises a wide
range of applications2. The TMDs are represented by the chemical formula MX2, where M is a
transition metal (Mo, W, etc.), X is a chalcogen (S, Se, Te, etc.), and they have a hexagonal structure.
In MX2, one M layer is sandwiched between two X layers with strong covalent bonds within one layer
but weak van der Waals interaction between adjacent layers. This makes it feasible to exfoliate into
mono- or few-layered nanosheets.
Among TMDs, MoS2 crystals are abundant, which prompted us to focus on MoS2 nanosheets. MoS2
sheets can be arranged into nanocapillary channels exhibiting ion sieving effects, thus useful for
desalination and nanofiltration applications3. Due to its layered structure, MoS2 is an excellent
lubricant in space applications4. Monolayer MoS2 is a direct bandgap semiconductor ( ̴1.8 eV) in
contrast to bulk ( ̴1.23 eV), making it useful for transistors5 and solar energy harvesting6. Few-layered
MoS2 is equally interesting for applications such as flexible and wearable electronics7, sensors8–11, drug
delivery12, supercapacitor13, and photo-catalysis14. MoS2 nanosheets have more surface-active sites
than the bulk, which is expected to enhance its electrocatalytic activity. These nanosheets have a high
surface area, thermal stability, electrical conductivity, and adsorption capability15. Several studies
indicate their potential for immediate applications as a catalyst in HER15–22.
The large-scale synthesis of MoS2 has been attempted several times, but it remains a challenge to
produce good quality and large quantities commercially5,14,23,24. The commonly used exfoliation
method of ultra-sonication can accommodate only a limited volume of parent dispersion. High-shear
methods25,26 employ rotor-stator shear mixers or kitchen blenders. They have been reported to
produce nanosheets similar in quality and size to those obtained from sonication, with high production
rates. Although the high-shear method is better than sonication in volume, it is inefficient. A huge high
shear mixer can compensate for the volume but leaves a large amount of material (away from the
rotor blade) unexfoliated. It also requires high power for operation. The attempts in this field are
directed towards increasing the exfoliation efficiency but have not been as successful as exploiting the
best out of the technique of liquid-phase exfoliation. Wang et al. exfoliated using sonication and
achieved the final nanosheets concentration of 0.2 mg/ml27. Using a solvothermal treatment with
formamide, Huang et al. found the concentration of the MoS2 nanosheets to be 0.21 mg/ml28. Liu et
al. achieved a 0.24 mg/ml by a high-pressure method, wherein they improved the exfoliation
efficiency of MoS2 nanosheets in isopropanol using inexpensive salts23. The high shear mixing
technique applied by Varrla et al. led to a better concentration of 0.4 mg/ml25. Recently, Janica et al.
exfoliated MoS2 nanosheets using lithium compound and achieved 0.5 mg/ml concentration12. Hai et
al. employed a surfactant-free method to increase MoS2 monolayers' yield and achieved a
concentration of 0.45 mg/ml in isopropanol29. Earlier, Lin et al. produced MoS2 nanosheets with a yield
of 52% in NaNO3/HCl solution, but the method utilized hazardous acids30.
In this paper, we explore an eco-friendly and safe high-pressure liquid-phase exfoliation approach to
overcome issues associated with large-scale and high-yield production of stable MoS2 nanosheets. A
large quantity of MoS2 (>1000 ml) was exfoliated with this method using deionized (DI) water as the
solvent, which has been deemed more complicated than exfoliation in NMP28 or DMF. This is due to
the difference in surface energy of DI water (72.2 mJ m-2) and MoS2 (46.5 mJ m-2)31, whereas the