
Version October 13, 2022 submitted to Journal Not Specified 2 of 11
in the physical or mathematical reality. When this occurs they tend to be a paradigm-shifting
moment: Newton’s, Maxwell’s, Einstein’s, Boltzmann’s seminal works in physics come running
to mind as well as those of Descartes, Fermat, Klein, Hamilton, Riemann, Langlands, and many
other seminal works in the realm of mathematics. Focusing on the physical reality, whatever
that means, we all would agree that many, if not all, physical systems can be modelled as a set
of interacting random variables. This is apparent when describing the macroscopic behaviour
of systems composed of a large number of constituents. Here the main goal of statistical
mechanics is, by relating the macrostate of a system with all the microstates compatible to it, to
explain all phases of matter and transitions between them. While descriptions of pure phases
rely on the central limit theorem, close to a phase transition, when the microscopic constituents
of the system become more and more correlated, the law of large numbers miserably fails and
other techniques, such a renormalization group, must be used in its stead. Obviously, studying
one physical system after another, identifying their basic constituents and their interactions,
and seeking suitable mathematical and physical techniques to analyse them can be a tall order
and, at times, quite frankly, tiring. In the last couple of decades, a more mundane and basic
approach has been used: look for those mathematical models in which correlations of random
variables can be easily modelled and manipulated, and study in these systems the emergence
of new universal laws. Due to this, Random Matrix Theory (RMT) has been at the forefront
in the study of emergent behaviour of correlated random variables. Originally introduced to
deal with the complexities of heavy nuclei Hamiltonian systems [
1
] —and historically also to
deal with noisy linear systems of equations [
2
]— RMT has grown to be an extremely successful
theory with a surprisingly wide range of applications [
3
–
9
]. Its three main symmetry classes,
the so-called canonical ensembles, were originally unveiled in [
10
,
11
] and several others [
12
]
—like the Wishart [
13
], circular, or non-Hermitian ensembles— took more relevance over the
years.
It was first Tracy and Widom [
14
–
16
] who dared to look at how the probability distribution
of the largest eigenvalue typically behaves, and whether its distribution departed from the
one described by the extreme value theorem of Fisher-Tippett-Gnedenko for independent and
identically distributed random variables [
17
,
18
]. It was noticed that a new emergent distribu-
tion appears, the now celebrated Tracy-Widom distribution. After this, a flurry of research
followed suit, originated by the seminal work of Dean and Majumdar [
19
], focusing primarily
in understanding the large deviation properties of extreme eigenvalues in standard ensembles
of random matrices. By exploiting Dyson’s log-gas analogy and, shrewdly using saddle-point
techniques, they managed to obtain the left and right rate functions of extreme eigenvalues.
Importantly, they noticed that the deviations to the left of, say, the largest eigenvalues are
markedly different to the ones on its right, scaling differently with the system size. More
research was done along these lines for other standard random matrix ensembles [
20
–
29
], in
diluted ensembles of random matrices [
30
–
35
], and generalizations based on Dyson’s log-gas
analogy [
36
–
38
], among many others, to ascertain the robustness of this new emergent law on
the statistics of extreme values.
While RMT has been a fruitful mathematical laboratory in this particular endeavour, it
was also recognized that its ensembles are somewhat unrealistic in the sense that they assume
interactions to involve all Hilbert-space states, whereas typical forces in nature involve two-,
three-, or a few-body interactions. This criticism led to the introduction of the two-body
ensembles [
39
–
42
], which eventually was generalized to the
k
-body embedded ensembles
by French and Mon [
43
]. Many results are known for the
k
-body embedded ensembles of
Gaussian random matrices, which mostly focus on the properties of the mean-level density [
44
–
46
]. Regarding the fluctuation properties of the spectrum, while it has not been proven that
they are of RMT type for the fermionic two-body embedded ensembles in the limit of large
matrices, there is vast numerical evidence that points on that direction, at least for the central