
2
FIG. 2. Hierarchy of dispersion curves k2
zn (ω), Eq. (24), and
their intersections (degeneracy points) for the infinite-grating
eigenmodes in the titanium-oxide grating; ε1= 6.25, ε2=
3.9, ρ = 0.39183; kx= 0. The symbol Dl
n,n+1 labels the l-th
intersection of the n-th and (n+1)-th eigenmodes and signifies
the associated BIC.
can freely escape from the waveguide into the cover and
substrate. The latter distinguishes the phenomenon of
BICs from a conventional trapping of fields inside waveg-
uides or cavities which is based on a complete prevention
(say, by means of reflection) of the entire continuum of
waves from propagating outside the waveguide or cav-
ity. The search, analysis, design, and applications of the
BICs constitute a very active field of modern research in
a variety of wave systems, especially in photonics, despite
the BIC having first been suggested for matter waves in
quantum mechanics [2–4]. The mechanisms of forma-
tion and properties of various BICs in photonic struc-
tures had been widely discussed in the literature (see, for
example, reviews [5–9] and papers [10–21]). In particu-
lar, the BIC in the grating layer sandwiched by the cover
and substrate had been demonstrated via numerical sim-
ulations for a particular set of parameters in [10]. Yet,
despite the fact that the planar lamellar (that is, uniform
along yaxis) grating waveguide is one of the most basic,
simple examples of photonic structures supporting BICs,
a full analytical theory of BICs, in particular, degener-
ate BICs, in the grating waveguide and eigenmode-based
understanding of degenerate-BIC appearance have been
missing until now. This approach, in particular, reveals
exact analytical formulas clarifying universal features of
the BIC formation which, otherwise, would stay hidden.
Apparently, the main reason for that is the fact that
most works on BICs are based on ad hoc numerical sim-
ulations dominating modern analysis of photonic-crystal
structures. They employ various software based on finite-
element modeling like COMSOL [22], rigorous coupled
wave analysis (RCWA) [24], finite-difference time-domain
(FDTD) method [23], codes for layered periodic struc-
tures [25], finite element method (FEM) [15], etc.
Another reason is that the BIC-formation mechanism
in such a simple, basic photonic structure as the pla-
nar lamellar-grating waveguide turns out to be so special
that it simultaneously merges almost all other known
mechanisms leading to the BIC formation (see reviews
[5–9]), including mechanisms of the symmetry-protected
BIC, accidental BIC, single-resonance parametric BIC,
coupled multiple resonances (Friedrich–Wintgen, but not
Fabry–P´erot) BIC, interference-based BIC through pa-
rameter tuning, and topologically-protected BIC. A more
detailed discussion of this fact requires results presented
in sections II–VI and is postponed to sect. VII.
The present paper is devoted to introducing such an
analytical eigenmode approach per se, not to its thor-
ough application for classification of all possible BICs or
discovery of new BICs. We give a new interpretation of
the known symmetry-protected BIC, in particular, de-
generate BICs, but do not attempt, within the scope of
the present paper, to design a BIC of a new type. It
is remarkable how merely splitting the central dielectric
layer of the planar waveguide into two alternating sec-
tions of lengths d1, d2(with a fill factor ρ=d1/(d1+d2))
and different permittivities ε1, ε2converts an elementary,
trivially soluble problem of the planar dielectric waveg-
uide [26–28] into a rich, complex problem demonstrating
many generic features of optical crystals.
Optical gratings and related waveguides are also in-
teresting by themselves, irrespective to BICs, since they
have found numerous applications and been studied for
decades (see, for instance, [26,27,29–37] and references
therein). One of the most elegant methods of their stud-
ies is based on the analysis of eigenmodes that is very
fruitful both for the analytical theory and numerical sim-
ulations (see [1,28–31] and references therein). An-
other, more straightforward method is the Fourier modal
method which prevails in the literature and is known as
the rigorous coupled wave theory in the diffractive optics
community [11,29,30] or the scattering-matrix approach
in the photonic-crystal community [32–37].
In the present paper, we consider a particular example
of a waveguide eigenmode – a degenerate BIC originating
due to the mechanism outlined in the second paragraph
of the paper. The in-plane x-wavenumber of that BIC
waveguide eigenmode is chosen to be near the Γ-point –
the center of the first Brillouin zone of the grating, that
is kx≈0. (We assume that ky= 0 since we consider
only the standard, invariant in the ydirection, grating
problem when fields are uniform along the yaxis and
propagate in the xz-plane. So, we leave the conical case
of diffraction [38] aside.) This choice is predetermined by
strongly enhanced backscattering coupling in this excep-
tional high-symmetry point in the momentum space so