
The model (1) is named as multiple-component elementary chirp model. Although the
model (1) is widely applicable, the literature on this model is rather limited (see, for
example, Mboup and Adali [16] and Casazza and Fickus [5] for few notable exceptions).
Here, estimation of the chirp rate i.e. the frequency rate is of utmost importance. Some
of the applications where chirp rate estimation is considered as of prime importance can
be found in sonar pulse detection [1], in micro-Doppler signal analysis [3], in acoustic
signal analysis [2], in focusing on the synthetic aperture radar images [6], and many more.
There are some estimation methods which mainly aim on the estimation of the instan-
taneous frequency rate (IFR), which is twice the chirp rate. Estimator based on cubic
phase function (CPF) [17] is one of them and other methods motivated by CPF such as
Nonparametric Chirp-Rate estimator based on CPF [7], viterbi algorithm [8], integrated
CPF (ICPF) [21] and product CPF (PCPF) [22], to name a few, have been discussed in
the literature.
In this paper, we propose some estimation methods to estimate the elementary chirp
model (1) parameters. We propose least squares estimators (LSEs), approximate least
squares estimators (ALSEs), sequential LSEs and sequential ALSEs, study their theo-
retical asymptotic properties and compare their numerical performances. Model (1) is a
non-linear regression model, as should be noted. In the literature, theoretical results on
the general non-linear regression model have been established by Jennrich [12] and Wu
[23]. It has been observed that the sufficient conditions of Jennrich [12] and Wu [23] are
not satisfied by model (1) for the LSEs to be consistent. Thus, one cannot apply the
results of Jennrich [12] and Wu [23] directly to establish the theoretical properties of the
LSEs.
It is established that the least squares estimation method and the approximate least
squares estimation method provide the same optimal rates of convergence for the ampli-
tude parameters and the frequency rate parameters, that is OpN−1
2and OpN−5
2,
respectively. Here, OpN−δmeans NδOpN−δis bounded in probability. In all the
proposed estimation methods, we have to perform non-linear optimization for which we
need to employ a numerical method. To employ a numerical technique, a set of initial
values of the non-linear parameters is required. In the absence of good initial values (near
to the true parameter values), due to high non-linearity of the least squares surface, the
algorithm rather than converging to a global minimum, may converge to a local minimum,
see Rice and Rosenblatt [18]. Therefore, to choose good initial values, we use the con-
ventional grid search method. For the model (1), it is observed that the general-purpose
iterative procedures like Newton-Raphson, Gauss-Newton, or their different versions, re-
quire a long time to converge to the LSEs even from a set of good initial values. Therefore,
we use downhill simplex method, to compute the LSEs and ALSEs, efficiently.
To obtain the initial values for the proposed methods in case of model (1), we have to
do a multi-dimensional grid search which is a numerically intense problem in itself. Fur-
ther, when the variance of the error random variable is high or when the two frequency
rates are close to each other, multi-dimensional grid search may result in the initial values
which are not close to the true parameter values. This may lead to incorrect parameter
2