
2
However, despite the suggestive fractional entropies in
certain Kondo-type models [29–31,58–61], the explicit
construction of parafermion operators in these systems
has not previously been possible. This is because – un-
like for the simpler case of Majoranas – parafermions can-
not arise in an effective free fermion system. Applying
the EK method yields an irreducibly strongly-interacting
model, which has hitherto hindered finding exact solu-
tions in which free local parafermions could be identified.
In this Letter we study the double charge-Kondo
(DCK) model describing a very recent experiment [60]
involving two hybrid metal-semiconductor islands cou-
pled together in series, and each coupled to its own lead,
at quantum point contacts (QPCs) – see Fig. 1. The
DCK model is a variant of the celebrated 2IK model,
but with an inter-island Kondo interaction rather than
an RKKY exchange interaction [21]. At the triple point
in the charge stability diagram of the device, a QCP was
found to arise due to the competition between island-lead
Kondo and inter-island Kondo [60]. Numerical renor-
malization group [33,34,62,63] (NRG) calculations for
the DCK model showed a fractional residual entropy of
1
2ln(3) at the QCP – suggesting an unusual anyonic state
(and not simply a Majorana). The same critical point
and fractional entropy were identified analytically near
perfect QPC transmission [64], although no Kondo ef-
fects occur in this limit.
Here we examine the “Kondo” case of weak-to-
intermediate transmission, and apply the EK mapping
[32] in the Toulouse limit. Even though the EK method
yields a highly nontrivial interacting model, we show that
it can nevertheless be solved using Bethe ansatz. Instead
of the free Majorana found by EK for the 2CK model,
we explicitly establish the existence of a Z3parafermion
in the DCK model, and identify it as the source of the
1
2ln(3) residual entropy. Analytic expressions for conduc-
tance near the QCP are also extracted, and we show that
experimental transport data are consistent with these
predictions. To complete the theoretical description,
we obtain the full temperature dependence of entropy
and conductance via NRG, which does not rely on the
Toulouse approximation.
System and model.– The two-island circuit illustrated
in Fig. 1is described by the DCK model at low tempera-
tures TEC(with ECthe island charging energies) for
weak-to-intermediate QPC transmissions, see Ref. [60]:
HDCK =JLS+
Ls−
L+JRS+
Rs−
R+JCS+
RS−
Ls−
C+ H.c.
−hLSz
L−hRSz
R+ISz
LSz
R+Helec ,
(1)
where Helec =Pα,σ,k kψ†
ασkψασk describes the elec-
tronic reservoirs either side of QPC α=L, C, R. Al-
though the physical electrons are spin-polarized [60],
we label electrons on the lead or island either side of
QPC L, R as σ=↑or ↓, and island electrons to the
left or right of the central QPC Cas σ=↑or ↓– see
Fig. 1. We assume linear dispersion k=vFk, with
momentum k. We then define pseudospin operators
s−
α=ψ†
α↓(0)ψα↑(0) and s+
α= (s−
α)†, where ψασ (0) is
defined at the QPC position. Confining our attention
to the lowest two macroscopic charge states of each is-
land |n, mi ≡ |niL⊗ |miR, with n=N, N + 1 the num-
ber of electrons on the left island and m=M, M + 1
electrons on the right island, we introduce ‘impurity’
charge pseudospin operators S+
L=Pm|N+1, mihN, m|,
Sz
L=Pm1
2[|N+ 1, mihN+ 1, m|−|N, mihN, m|], S+
R=
Pn|n, M + 1ihn, M|,Sz
R=Pn1
2[|n, M + 1ihn, M + 1|−
|n, Mihn, M|] and S−
α= (S+
α)†. The first line in Eq. (1)
therefore corresponds to tunneling processes at the three
QPCs (with the tunneling amplitude Jαbeing related to
the transmission ταof QPC α). Gate voltages on the is-
lands control hL,R and allow the charge stability diagram
to be navigated. Iis a capacitive interaction between the
two islands. For JL,C,R =I= 0, the four retained charge
configurations |n, miare degenerate when hL=hR= 0.
However, a finite JCand/or Ipartially lifts this degen-
eracy to yield a pair of separated triple points (TPs) in
gate voltage space. As with the experiment [60], here we
focus on the vicinity of the TP at which the charge con-
figurations |N, Mi/|N+1, Mi/|N, M +1iare degenerate.
We hereafter neglect the term I, since it just renormal-
izes the TP splitting already induced by JC>0 and is
otherwise irrelevant [64]. The rest of this Letter is de-
voted to the nontrivial Kondo competition arising when
the couplings to the leads are switched on, JL,R >0.
QCP.– At the TP, the three ‘impurity’ states (the de-
generate charge configurations of the two-island struc-
ture) are interconverted by tunneling at the three QPCs:
|N, MiJL
↔ |N+ 1, MiJC
↔ |N, M + 1iJR
↔ |N, Mi
The accompanying conduction electron pseudospin-flip
scattering at each QPC described by the operators s±
L,C,R
in Eq. (1) give rise to competing Kondo effects. Since
island-lead and inter-island Kondo effects cannot be si-
multaneously satisfied, a frustration-driven QCP arises
when JL=JR=JC, as reported in Refs. [60,64].
NRG solution.– In Fig. 2we present numerically-exact
results for the DCK model tuned to the TP, obtained
by NRG [33,34,62,63] (see [61] for details). We set
JL=JR≡Jand vary JCin the vicinity of the QCP
arising when JC=J. In panel (a) we show the impurity
contribution to the entropy Simp as a function of tem-
perature T. The critical point JC=J, shown as the red
line, exhibits Kondo ‘overscreening’ to an NFL state on
the scale of TK. The three degenerate charge states give
a high-Tentropy of ln(3), but the entropy is partially
quenched to 1
2ln(3) for TTK. Introducing channel
anisotropy JC6=Jinduces a Fermi liquid (FL) crossover
on the lower scale of T∗, below which the entropy is com-
pletely quenched. The inset shows the extracted power-
law behavior,
T∗/TK∼(|JC−J|/TK)3/2.(2)