4
solution of bases MOH, where M+ is an alkali metal cation. For bases MOH , the convection is enhanced for counter-
ion M+ sequence of Li+ < Na+ < K+ < Cs+ . The experimental investigation revealed that the concentration of base in
solution strongly impacts the nonlinear finger instability, where higher concentration leads to faster instability and
shorter time for onset of convection. Furthermore, despite M+ ions not actively participating in the geochemical
reactions during the dissolution process, the nature of different M+ ions vary in the instability development.
Loodts et al. [39] observed the effect of pressure, temperature, and NaCl concentration on CO2 dissolution
properties. Their study suggested that increasing CO2 pressure or reducing temperature or salt concentration leads to
higher convective instability. However, temperature has a minimal effect on CO2 dissolution properties, so controlling
the temperature is not essential for the reproducibility of experimental studies [39]. Thomas et al. investigated the
effect of salinity by the dissolution of gaseous CO2 in pure water, Antarctic water, and 0.5-5 M NaCl dissolved in
water [40]. The results showed that higher salt concentration delays the formation of instabilities, resulting in delayed
onset of convection. Moreover, increased convection pattern wavelength and decreased fingers' velocity and the
growth rate increased the salt concentration. Kim and Kim [41] derived and solved linear stability equations for the
effect of chemical reactions in an initially quiescent vertical Hele-Shaw cell. Their nonlinear numerical simulation
showed that chemical reactions enhance the diffusive flux; however, by retarding the onset of buoyancy-driven
convective motion, convective flux is weakened.
Formation dip angle is another key factor of consideration for safely storing CO2 on subsurface geological
sites, as it significantly impacts spatial migration distribution during CO2 dissolution [42–44]. For larger dip angles,
the supercritical CO2 phase could change to a gas phase during upward migration in the reservoir up-dip direction,
where the reservoir formation temperature and hydrostatic pressure are lower [43]. As a result, reservoirs with higher
dip angles have more chance of CO2 leakage during geological storage. Jang et al. [42] simulated the effect of dip
angle and salinity of CO2 storage. For formation dip angles of 0°, 5°, and 10°, the migrated CO2 distances were 60%,
73.3%, and 86.7%, respectively, compared to a 15° dip angle in the 200th year of CO2 migration. Therefore, with a
larger formation dip angle, there is a higher possibility of spatial CO2 migration. They concluded that reservoirs with
higher dip angle and salinity have low CO2 geological storage safety. Wang et al. [43] observed similar effects of
formation dip, where the total CO2 storage amount is inversely proportional to the formation dip angle. The impact of
dip angle is more prominent in storage reservoirs with higher porosity and permeability [43]. As Jing et al. [35]
observed, higher salinity and high dip angle are not conducive to CO2 geological storage. However, the effect of
salinity is observed to be more significant than that of dip angle on the CO2 liquid phase mass fraction.
During the injection of CO2 in deep saline aquifers, the natural fractures present in the formation may
propagate, or new fractures may be induced in the reservoir. The fracture networks in a hydrocarbon reservoir play a
vital role in fluid transport from the pores to the wellbore as they are significantly more conductive than the matrix
[45–48]. The same principle is applicable during the CO2 sequestration operation, which makes it difficult to predict
the movement of plumes during the injection of CO2 in fractured porous media. Hence, natural and induced fracture
networks in the geological storage sites should also be considered to predict CO2 subsurface movement. Due to the
opening and closing of the fractures, the reservoir properties also deviate from the value measured from the core