1 Seventy Years of Radar and Communications The Road from Separation to Integration

2025-04-28 0 0 817.73KB 14 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
1
Seventy Years of Radar and Communications:
The Road from Separation to Integration
Fan Liu, Member, IEEE, Le Zheng, Senior Member, IEEE, Yuanhao Cui, Member, IEEE,
Christos Masouros, Senior Member, IEEE, Athina P. Petropulu, Fellow, IEEE,
Hugh Griffiths, Fellow, IEEE, and Yonina C. Eldar, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract—Radar and communications (R&C) as key utilities of
electromagnetic (EM) waves have fundamentally shaped human
society and triggered the modern information age. Although
R&C have been historically progressing separately, in recent
decades they have been converging towards integration, forming
integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems, giving
rise to new, highly desirable capabilities in next-generation
wireless networks and future radars. To better understand the
essence of ISAC, this paper provides a systematic overview on
the historical development of R&C from a signal processing (SP)
perspective. We first interpret the duality between R&C as signals
and systems, followed by an introduction of their fundamental
principles. We then elaborate on the two main trends in their
technological evolution, namely, the increase of frequencies and
bandwidths, and the expansion of antenna arrays. We then show
how the intertwined narratives of R&C evolved into ISAC, and
discuss the resultant SP framework. Finally, we overview future
research directions in this field.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background and Motivation
SINCE the 20th century, the development of human civi-
lization has relied largely upon the exploitation of elec-
tromagnetic (EM) waves. Governed by Maxwell’s equations,
EM waves are capable of travelling over large distances at
the speed of light, which makes them a perfect information
carrier. In general, one may leverage EM waves to acquire
information on physical targets, including range, velocity, and
angle, or to efficiently deliver artificial information, e.g., texts,
voices, images, and videos from one point to another. Among
many applications, EM waves have enabled information acqui-
sition and delivery, which form the foundation of our modern
information era, and have given rise to the proliferation of
radar and communication (R&C) technologies.
While the existence of EM waves was theoretically pre-
dicted by Maxwell in 1865, and experimentally verified by
Hertz in 1887, its capability of carrying information to travel
long distances was not validated until Marconi’s transatlantic
F. Liu and Y. Cui are with the Southern University of Science and Technol-
ogy, Shenzhen, China. Y. Cui was with the Beijing University of Posts and
Telecommunications, Beijing, China (e-mail: {cuiyh,liuf6}@sustech.edu.cn).
L. Zheng is with the Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT), Beijing, China
(e-mail: le.zheng.cn@gmail.com).
C. Masouros and H. Griffiths are with the University College
London, London, WC1E 7JE, UK (e-mail: chris.masouros@ieee.org,
h.griffiths@ucl.ac.uk).
A. P. Petropulu is with the Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, NJ
08854, United States (e-mail: athinap@rutgers.edu).
Y. C. Eldar is with the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
(e-mail: yonina.eldar@weizmann.ac.il).
wireless experiment in 1901 [1]. The successful reception
of the first transatlantic radio signal marked the beginning
of the great information era. From then on, communication
technology has rapidly grown thanks to the heavy demand for
intelligence, intercept and cryptography technologies during
the two world wars. It is generally difficult to identify a precise
date for the birth of radar. Some of the early records showed
that the German inventor C. H¨
ulsmeyer was able to use radio
signals to detect distant metallic objects as early as 1904. In
1915, the British radar pioneer Robert Watson Watt, employed
radio signals to detect thunderstorms and lightning. The R&D
of modern radar systems was not carried out until the mid
1930s. The term RADAR was first used by the US Navy as
an acronym of “RAdio Detection And Ranging” in 1939.
Despite the fact that both technologies originated from the
discoveries of Maxwell and Hertz, R&C have been largely
treated as two separate research fields due to different con-
straints in their respective applications, and were therefore
independently investigated and developed for decades. His-
torically, the technological evolution of R&C follows two
main trends: a) from low frequencies to higher frequencies
and larger bandwidths [2], and b) from single-antenna to
multi-antenna or even massive-antenna arrays [3], [4]. With
recent developments, the combined use of large-antenna arrays
and Millimeter Wave (mmWave)/Terahertz (THz) band signals
results in striking similarities between R&C systems in terms
of the hardware architecture, channel characteristics, as well
as signal processing methods. Hence, the boundary between
R&C is becoming blurred, and hardware and spectrum con-
vergence has led to a design paradigm shift, where the two
systems can be co-designed for efficiently utilizing resources,
offering tunable tradeoffs and unprecedented synergies for
mutual benefits. This line of research is typically referred
to as integrated sensing and communications (ISAC), and is
applicable in numerous emerging areas, including vehicular
networks, IoT networks, and activity recognition [5], [6].
Over the last decade, ISAC has been well-recognized as a
key enabling technology for both next-generation wireless
networks and radar systems [5]. Given the potential of ISAC,
a deeper understanding of the various connections and dis-
tinctions between R&C, and learning from how they evolved
from separation to integration, is important for inspiring future
research.
In Fig. 1 we summarize key milestones achieved in R&C
history, which are split into four categories with different
markers, namely, individual R&C technologies, general tech-
arXiv:2210.00446v2 [eess.SP] 30 Apr 2023
2
nologies that are useful for both, and ISAC technologies.
In the remainder of the paper, we will discuss how these
key techniques facilitate the development of R&C and ISAC
systems.
B. Summary and Organization of the Paper
In this paper, we provide a systematic overview on the
development and key milestones achieved in the history of
R&C from an SP perspective. We commence by introducing
the fundamental principles and SP theories of both R&C. We
then present the spectrum engineering of R&C, namely, from
narrowband to wideband, and from single-carrier to multi-
carrier systems. Furthermore, we elaborate on the expansion
of R&C systems’ antenna arrays, i.e., from single-antenna
systems, to phased-array, and to MIMO, massive MIMO
(mMIMO), and distributed antenna systems. Following the
above two technological trends, the paths of R&C eventually
move from separation to integration, and give rise to the ISAC
technology, which motivates the detailed discussion on the
SP framework of ISAC. Finally, we summarize the paper and
identify future research directions.
II. FUNDAMENTALS OF RADAR AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Basic Principles: A Signals-and-Systems Perspective
The basic system setting for both R&C consists of three
parts: a transmitter (Tx), which produces EM waves, a channel,
over which EM waves propagate, and a receiver (Rx), which
receives EM waves distorted by the channel. While commu-
nication Txs and Rxs are usually well separated, radar Txs
and Rxs may either be collocated or separately positioned,
leading to mono-static or bi-static radar settings, respectively.
In more complicated scenarios, multiple Txs and Rxs may be
involved in both applications, which correspond to multi-user
communications and multi-static radar systems.
It is often convenient to represent EM waves by the elec-
trical field intensity, as a complex signal as a function of time
t. The core tasks for R&C can then be defined as:
Information Acquisition for Radar: The aim here is to
extract the target information embedded in the received
signal, given knowledge of the transmit signal.
Information Delivery for Communications: The aim
here is to recover the useful information contained in the
transmit signal at the communication Rx, with knowledge
of the channel response.
By denoting the signals at the Tx and Rx at time tas s(t)
and y(t), respectively, the propagation of the signal within
the channel can be modeled as a mapping from its input
s(t)to the output y(t). Ideally, if the noise and disturbance
are not considered, such a mapping is linear due to the
physical nature of EM fields and waves, or equivalently, owing
to the linearity of Maxwell’s equations. Furthermore, if the
channel characteristics remain unchanged within a certain time
period, it can be approximated as a linear time-invariant (LTI)
system, characterized by its impulse response h(t). As such,
the linear mapping is expressed as a convolution integral
y(t)=(sh) (t). While the signaling pulses may be of
different forms for R&C, we suppose that a Nyquist pulse is
leveraged such that s(t)is substantially time-limited on a finite
interval [T, T ]. Therefore, signal can be sampled in a nearly
lossless manner after passing through the pulse-shaping filter
at the Rx, expressed as a convolution sum y(n)=(sh) (n)
at the nth sampling point. Let s= [s(N), . . . , s (N)]Tbe
the Tx signal with length 2N+1,h= [h(0) , . . . , h (P1)]T
be the channel impulse response with length P, and y=
[y(N), . . . , y (N+P1)]Tbe the Rx signal with length
2N+P. Then the convolution can be recast as y=Hs, where
H= Toep (h)C(2N+P)×(2N+1) is a Toeplitz matrix, with
the nth column being 0T
n1,hT,0T
2Nn+1T. Alternatively,
one may express yas y=Sh by the commutative property,
where S= Toep (s)C(2N+P)×P.
The above duality between interchangeable signals and
systems implies an interesting connection between R&C. From
the communication perspective, the process of the Tx signal
passing through a channel may be viewed as a linear transform
Happlied to s, with the communication task being to recover
the information embedded in sby receiving y. From the radar
perspective, the sensing task is to recover the target parameters
embedded in h, which is viewed as an input “signal”, by
observing y, which is viewed as an output signal linearly
transformed from hthrough a “system” S. This reveals that
the basic SP problems in R&C are mathematically similar.
B. Linear Gaussian Models
Consider the more general linear Gaussian signal model by
taking additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) into account:
Y=H(η)S(ξ) + Z,(1)
where Yand Sare the sampled receive and transmit signals,
which could be defined over multiple domains, e.g., time-space
or time-frequency domain, His the corresponding channel
matrix (not necessarily Topelitz), and Zis the white Gaussian
noise signal with variance σ2. The channel His a function
of the physical parameters η, e.g., range, angle, and Doppler.
The transmit signal Smay be encoded/modulated with some
information codewords ξ. Model (1) represents many R&C
systems as elaborated below.
Radar Signal Model: Radar systems aim at extracting
target parameters ηfrom Y. For both radar Tx and Rx, S
is typically a known deterministic signal, in which case
ξcan be omitted since the radar waveform contains no
information. This can be expressed as
Yr=Hr(η)Sr+Zr.(2)
Communication Signal Model: Communication systems
aim at recovering codewords ξfrom Y. The channel H,
which is sometimes regarded as an unstructured matrix,
can be estimated a priori via pilots. Therefore, knowing
ηmay not be the first priority. The resulting model is
Yc=HcSc(ξ) + Zc.(3)
The subscripts (·)rand (·)care to differentiate R&C signals,
channels, and noises, respectively. We highlight that (2) and
(3) describe a variety of R&C signal models. For example, (2)
3
Radar
Communications
General Tech
ISAC
Maxwell's Equations
Hertz's EM Experiment
Marconi's Transatlantic Experiment
Watt's Thunderstorm Experiment
First wireless voice transmission
Nyquist Sampling Theorem
BBC's TV Broadcast Experiment
Birth of the Acronym "RADAR"
Matched-Filtering
Phased-Array Radar
Cramér-Rao Lower Bound
NP Detection Criterion
Shannon's Information Theory
Swerling Target Models
First ISAC Signaling Scheme
LDPC Code
FFT Algorithm
OFDM Modulation
SFW Waveform
MUSIC Algorithm
ESPRIT Algorithm
AMRFC Project
MIMO Comms Patent
Chirp-based ISAC Signaling
MIMO Radar
Phased-MIMO Radar
OFDM-based ISAC Signaling
Massive MIMO Comms
SSPARC Project
Hybrid Beamforming for MmWave Comms
Perceptive Mobile Network
3GPP MmWave Standardization
Massive MIMO Radar
ISAC Standardization
19011862 1887 1915 19301928 1939 1943 19441945 1947 1948 19541963 19651967 1968 1979 19891994 1996 2003 2010 2013 2014 2017 2019 20222020
Fig. 1. Important milestones for radar and communications signal processing.
can be viewed as the target return of a multi-input multi-output
(MIMO) radar in a given range-Doppler bin, where ηrepre-
sents angles of targets. Similarly, (3) may be considered as a
narrowband MIMO communication signal. Alternatively, both
(2) and (3) can be viewed as orthogonal frequency-division
multiplexing (OFDM) signal models for R&C, respectively. In
the following, we do not specify the signal domain but focus
on generic models (2) and (3). More concrete signal models
will be discussed in Secs. III-IV. In addition to individual R&C
systems, (1) may also characterize the general ISAC signal
model. That is, a unified ISAC signal serves for dual purposes
of information delivering and target sensing, whereas R&C
channels may differ from each other. More details on ISAC
systems will be discussed in Sec. V.
C. Fundamental Signal Processing Theories
Below we elaborate on the fundamental SP theories of R&C,
and in particular focus on (2) and (3).
1) Signal Detection: Signal detection problems arise from
many R&C applications. One essential task for radar is to
determine whether a target exists by observing Yr, modeled
as a binary hypothesis testing (BHT) problem
Yr=(H0:Yr=Zr,
H1:Yr=Hr(η)Sr+Zr,(4)
where H0represents the null hypothesis, i.e., the radar receives
nothing but noise, and H1stands for the hypothesis where the
radar receives both the target return and noise. To address
the BHT problem above, one may need to design a detector
T(·)that maps the received signal Yrto a real number,
and then compare the output with a preset threshold γ, to
determine which hypothesis to choose as true. A target detector
may, for example, maximize the detection probability PD=
Pr (H1|H1), while maintaining a low false-alarm probability
PF A =Pr (H1|H0), following the Neyman-Pearson (NP)
criterion [7].
Signal detection also plays a critical role at the commu-
nication Rx. In (3), the communication Rx observes Yc=
HcSc(ξ) + Zc, and seeks to yield an estimate ˆ
ξof the
information symbol vector ξ= [ξ1, ξ2, . . . , ξN]T∈ A. This
problem can be solved by leveraging the minimum error
probability (MEP) criterion. That is, to minimize the error
probability Pe=P|A|
i=1 Pr ˆ
ξi6=ξiPr (ξi), where |A| is
the cardinality of A. The MEP criterion can be translated to
the MAP criterion, i.e., the recovered symbols should be the
maximizer of the a posterior probability. Note that the decision
region in the MEP criterion for communication symbols is
determined by their a priori probability, while the decision
thresholds in the NP criterion for radar is determined by the
required false-alarm probability, resulting in different designs
for R&C detectors.
2) Parameter Estimation: Parameter estimation represents
another category of basic SP techniques in R&C systems. For a
radar system, once a target is confirmed to be present, it needs
to further extract its parameters ηfrom Yrby conceiving an
estimator, mapping Yrfrom the signal space to an estimate ˆ
η,
defined as ˆ
η=F(Yr). To measure how accurate an estimator
is, a possible performance metric is the mean squared error
(MSE), expressed as ε=Ekηˆηk2. The average may be
over the noise or also over the parameters if they are assumed
random. When the parameters are assumed to be deterministic,
the MSE of any unbiased estimate is lower-bounded by the
Cram´
er-Rao bound (CRB), defined as the inverse of the Fisher
information matrix J[7]
Eh(ηˆη) (ηˆη)HiJ1=E2ln p(Yr;η)
η21
,
(5)
where p(Yr;η)is the probability density function (PDF)
of Yrparameterized by η. While the maximum likelihood
estimate (MLE) asymptotically achieves the CRB, attaining
the MLE can be highly computationally expensive. To that
end, low-complexity parameter estimation algorithms, e.g.,
MUSIC and ESPRIT [8], [9], have been widely applied in
practical situations, such as angle of arrival estimation.
In communication systems, the channel Hcshould be
estimated before delivering the useful information. For channel
estimation, the Tx sends pilots to the Rx, which are reference
signals known to both. The Rx then estimates the channel
based on both received signals and pilots. Channel estimation
is mathematically similar to the target estimation problem,
where the to-be-estimated parameters ηare entries of Hc,
which is regarded as an unstructured matrix. We will elaborate
on similarities and differences between estimation tasks for
communication channels and radar targets in Sec. IV.
3) Information Theory: Information theory serves as the
foundation of communication SP. A remarkable result attained
by C. E. Shannon in his landmark paper [10], published
in 1948, states that, for any discrete memoryless channel
摘要:

1SeventyYearsofRadarandCommunications:TheRoadfromSeparationtoIntegrationFanLiu,Member,IEEE,LeZheng,SeniorMember,IEEE,YuanhaoCui,Member,IEEE,ChristosMasouros,SeniorMember,IEEE,AthinaP.Petropulu,Fellow,IEEE,HughGrifths,Fellow,IEEE,andYoninaC.Eldar,Fellow,IEEEAbstract—Radarandcommunications(R&C)askeyu...

展开>> 收起<<
1 Seventy Years of Radar and Communications The Road from Separation to Integration.pdf

共14页,预览3页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:14 页 大小:817.73KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-28

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 14
客服
关注