General theory of relativity was so far verified by various types of experiments
– from the light deflection and the perihelion advance of Mercury to the recent
detection of gravitational waves [1, 2, 3, 4]. One of the consequences of this
theory is the necessary existence of singularities if the space-time is respecting
some usual causal properties and if the matter is respecting the usual energy
conditions (there are different variants of this result including the Strong, Null
or Weak Energy Condition), as proven by the singularity theorems of Hawking
[5, 6, 7]. One consequence of this result is the necessary existence of singularity
in the evolution of our Universe, called the big bang singularity, if general theory
of relativity is correct. However, the physical relevance of this result is highly
questionable – since it is precisely in such strong gravity regimes that we should
doubt the validity of Einstein’s general relativity as the correct description of
gravity. First of all, for strong gravitational fields both quantum behaviour of
matter fields and space-time itself will probably become important and signifi-
cantly change the field equations for gravity. The proper understanding of such
regimes therefore requires a proper knowledge of quantum theory of gravity,
which is, of course, still currently not available. On the other hand, assum-
ing the actual physical existence of singularities would mean the capitulation
with the respect to the fundamental goal of physics – namely, the complete,
non-divergent and consistent description of reality, including the evolution of
the Universe. For all this reasons, we should view the Hawking singularity theo-
rems more as a signal of incompleteness of Einstein’s general theory of relativity,
than the proof for the actual physical existence of singularities. Furthermore,
we believe that the demand for singularity-free solutions constitutes one of the
most important criteria for the future quantum theory of gravity, and therefore
also for the effective theories which are being investigated in order to overcome
the current gap between the quantum physics and description of gravity as a
geometry of space-time.
Various investigations in the past decades have demonstrated that even simple
modifications of gravitational Lagrangian with respect to the standard Einstein-
Hilbert action, while leaving all other physical assumptions of Einstein’s gen-
eral relativity intact, can prevent the appearance of the big-bang singularity
[8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Also, in higher curvature
gravity theories some important non-singular investigations have been done in
Gauss-Bonnet higher curvature gravity [22, 23, 24] and in f(R)gravity theo-
ries [25, 26, 27]. In such models the big bang singularity is then replaced by
the cosmological bounce, in which the Universe undergoes a transition from
contraction to expansion. It is worth remembering that there are in principle
no real physical reasons for favoring Einstein-Hilbert action in comparison to
higher curvature modifications, such as f(R),f(T)or higher derivative gravity
theories, as long as they lead to the same observable weak field limit and have
no theoretical pathologies. As a matter of fact, the Einstein-Hilbert action was
historically introduced as the simplest action leading to the Newtonian limit,
out of the infinitely many other equally possible options. The investigation of
possible modifications of gravitational action, and their consequences on the
2