LOCAL EXTREMA OF SPECTROGRAMS AND GAUSSIAN ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS 3
38, 16, 25] (these ‘zero-based’ methods have also been recently extended to wavelets, see
[49, 6, 15], to the sphere [55] and to the Stockwell transform [52]). Such algorithms have
found notable applications, for instance, in methods for anonymize motion sensor data and
enhance privacy in the Internet of Things (IoT) [57].
The analysis of local extrema of white noise spectrograms relies on the eigenvalues of the
Hessians of the Gaussian vectors, from which one can derive the Kac-Rice type formulas as
in [23]. The resulting expected number of local maxima is 1/3 times the expected number of
zeros. One can provide heuristics for the 1/3 proportion using a random honeycomb model,
suggested by Flandrin to describe zeros and local maxima of spectrograms of white noise
(see Figure 1 on page 6). By extrapolating such heuristics to the setting of holomorphic
sections of a Hermitian holomorphic line bundle over a complex manifold [23], the model
also suggests a hand-waving explanation for the occurrence of the factor 1/3 in the first
term of the statistics of supersymmetric vacua (modelled as fixed Morse index critical points
of random holomorphic sections). Moving to a different physical context, a correspondence
between the critical points of Gaussian entire functions and the zeros of a Gaussian bi-entire
function will be described. The Gaussian bi-entire function lives on the first higher Landau
level eigenspace, a space of paramount importance in condensed matter physics, used to
model electron dynamics on a energy level above the first layer of charged-like particles. The
Landau levels are the classical explanation for the step-like changes in conductivity under
the action of a constant magnetic field associated with the integer Quantum-Hall effect [50].
The results in this paper are novel to a certain extent, since their statement (both in the
GEF and time-frequency language) has not appeared before in the literature and given a
direct proof. But one should not go as far as calling them ‘genuinely new’, since general
results have been obtained for compact K¨ahler manifolds and the particular calculations
done for SU(2) random polynomials in [23] and [29]. It may come as a surprise that the
more simple (and also the most well-studied) case of the GEF has not been studied before,
since the cases treated in [23] and [29] are much more complicated. At least formally, our
main results could have been indirectly derived (one may say ‘guessed’, since actually some
definitions are a bit different for the non-compact case, most notably in the section on critical
values) by properly considering limit cases of the results for SU(2) polynomials in [23] and
[29]. Even if this argument could be made rigorous, it would be a long journey in comparison
to the direct and relatively elementary proofs we offer in this paper.
An outline of the paper follows. Since we will alternate between the spectrogram and
GEF formulations, to avoid confusing readers not familiar with both topics, we try to always
present both perspectives, sometimes at the cost of a little redundancy. In the next section
we present a short review of the required fundamental concepts about random Gaussian
functions and time-frequency analysis. In the third section we present the main results,