Accelerating Time-Reversal Imaging with Neural Operators for Real-time Earthquake Locations Hongyu Sun1 Yan Yang1 Kamyar Azizzadenesheli2 Robert W. Clayton1

2025-04-24 0 0 3.28MB 28 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Accelerating Time-Reversal Imaging with Neural
Operators for Real-time Earthquake Locations
Hongyu Sun 1, Yan Yang1, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli2, Robert W. Clayton1,
and Zachary E. Ross1
1Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd.,
Pasadena, CA 91125
2Nvidia Corporation, 2788 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95051
October 2022
Abstract
Earthquake hypocenters form the basis for a wide array of seismological analyses.
Pick-based earthquake location workflows rely on the accuracy of phase pickers and
may be biased when dealing with complex earthquake sequences in heterogeneous me-
dia. Time-reversal imaging of passive seismic sources with the cross-correlation imaging
condition has potential for earthquake location with high accuracy and high resolution,
but carries a large computational cost. Here we present an alternative deep-learning
approach for earthquake location by combining the benefits of neural operators for wave
propagation and time reversal imaging with multi-station waveform recordings. A U-
shaped neural operator is trained to propagate seismic waves with various source time
functions and thus can predict a backpropagated wavefield for each station in negligible
time. These wavefields can either be stacked or correlated to locate earthquakes from
the resulting source images. Compared with other waveform-based deep-learning loca-
tion methods, time reversal imaging accounts for physical laws of wave propagation and
is expected to achieve accurate earthquake location. We demonstrate the method with
the 2D acoustic wave equation on both synthetic and field data. The results show that
our method can efficiently obtain high resolution and high accuracy correlation-based
time reversal imaging of earthquake sources. Moreover, our approach is adaptable to
the number and geometry of seismic stations, which opens new strategies for real-time
earthquake location and monitoring with dense seismic networks.
keywords: Time reversal imaging, neural operators, earthquake location, wave propagation,
correlation
Corresponding author: hongyu-sun@outlook.com
1
arXiv:2210.06636v1 [physics.geo-ph] 13 Oct 2022
1 Introduction
Source locations are important for earthquake monitoring and early warning (Zhang et al.,
2021), understanding faulting properties and initiation of earthquake sequences (Ross et al.,
2020), and hazard assessment of induced seismicity during industrial injection (Lin et al.,
2020). Routine earthquake location workflows usually include phase detection, picking, as-
sociation, and location. With such a sequentially-staged workflow, the resulting source
locations heavily depend on the initial picking results. However, picking is usually done on
seismograms from each station separately and may have difficulty when the first arrivals
overlap with the coda of a larger event. Furthermore, only P and S arrivals are used in
the estimation of earthquake locations, and converted waves that are common in complex
media do not contribute to the workflow. Instead, phase pickers may erroneously consider
converted waves as first arrivals and introduce errors to the location.
With the availability of dense seismic networks and distributed acoustic sensing, we
can directly locate earthquake sources from full waveforms with time reversal imaging and
benefit from the coherency of phases between stations. With full waveforms of seismograms
instead of picked arrivals, time-reversal imaging has shown its power for revealing earthquake
locations and source mechanisms at local (Zhu et al., 2019), regional (McMechan et al., 1985;
Larmat et al., 2008), and global (Larmat et al., 2006) scales. By backpropagating time-
reversed seismograms at receiver locations, seismic-wave energies will refocus at the origins
of seismic events, provided with reasonably accurate velocity models and assumptions of non
dissipative media (McMechan, 1982; Gajewski and Tessmer, 2005; Artman et al., 2010). We
can distinguish locations and estimate their origin time by detecting the maximum intensity
or reasonable focusing in the resulting source images.
The demanding computational cost and sometimes low spatial imaging resolution hinder
the universal application of time reversal imaging from earthquake location. Conventional
time reversal imaging methods simultaneously backpropagate entire seismograms and thus
result in source images by implicitly stacking wavefields at all stations. However, such result-
ing source imaging generally suffers from low imaging resolution, which makes it challenging
to search for source locations from records with low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Most re-
cently, Sun et al. (2015); Nakata and Beroza (2016) propose a cross-correlation imaging
method to enhance the spatial resolution of time-reversal source imaging by individually ex-
trapolating wavefields at each station and then cross-correlating these wavefields. However,
the computational cost increased by this method is proportional to the number of stations,
which imposes challenges for real-time earthquake location with a dense seismic network. To
reduce the computational cost of wavefield extrapolation, researchers have grouped several
receivers and performed backward wave propagation for each group before cross-correlation
(Zhu et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2022); however, this comes at a cost of reduced
image resolution, and the choice of grouping strategy only depends on experience and is not
straightforward (Bai et al., 2022). In addition, Baker et al. (2005) directly image earthquake
source locations with Kirchhoff reconstruction of ground motions. Li et al. (2020a) approx-
imate wave-equation solutions with simplified Gaussian beam for efficient source location
with time reversal methods.
Deep learning has become state of the art for most earthquake monitoring tasks, leading
to advances in our knowledge about the Earth (Ross et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Yang et al.,
2
2022a). On one hand, inspired by traditional pick-based earthquake location workflows, deep
learning has been used in each step of the sequential workflow (Zhang et al., 2022), including
earthquake detection (Ross et al., 2018a), phase picking (Ross et al., 2018b; Zhu and Beroza,
2019), phase association (Ross et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2022), and location (Smith et al., 2022).
On the other hand, various deep learning methods are developed to infer earthquake locations
directly from continuous waveforms (van den Ende and Ampuero, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021;
M¨unchmeyer et al., 2021; Shen and Shen, 2021). By introducing time reversal imaging to
deep learning, we propose to combine physical laws of wave propagation with deep neural
operators and to determine source locations directly from waveforms recorded at all stations
in a seismic network with relatively high accuracy.
In this work, we propose to achieve time-reversal imaging with neural operators for real-
time earthquake location. Neural operators (Kovachki et al., 2021) are a generalization of
neural networks to learn operators that map between infinite dimensional function spaces.
It has been used to solve various partial differential equations (PDEs) with state-of-the-
art efficiency (Li et al., 2020b). In seismology, Yang et al. (2021, 2022b) used Fourier
neural operators (Li et al., 2020b) to solve the acoustic and elastic wave equations in 2D
and demonstrate their ability to accelerate forward modeling for full-waveform inversion.
Here, we train a U-shaped neural operator (Rahman et al., 2022) with random source time
functions. This allows for the neural operator to learn backward wave propagation and
predict time reversed wavefields with negligible compute time. The predicted wavefields
can be either stacked or correlated; they result in a source image that can be searched for
the earthquake location. We test the neural operators on both a synthetic dataset and a
real dataset taken from the 2016 IRIS community wavefield experiment in Oklahoma (Sweet
et al., 2018). We find that time reversal modeling with the trained neural operator enables
us to locate earthquake locations from correlation-based source images with high resolution
and efficiency. We use the 2D acoustic wave equations to illustrate our method but it is
straightforward to extend the method to elastic and 3D cases.
2 Method
We first briefly review time-reversal imaging of seismic sources. Then, we introduce the basics
of neural operators and propose to achieve time reversal modeling by training a U-shaped
neural operator for wave propagation with various source time functions. Our approach to
synthesizing a training dataset for wavefield backpropagation is also detailed.
2.1 Time reversal imaging
The principle of time reversal states that time reversed wavefields will refocus to original
source locations during backpropagation regardless of the complexity of the propagation
medium since the acoustic wave equation in a nondissipative and heterogeneous medium is
invariant for time reversal (Fink, 2006). Time reversal imaging with seismic data d(xs,xr, t)
emitted from passive sources xsand observed at stations xrconsists of the following steps:
Reversing seismograms in time with d(xs,xr, T t) = d(xs,xr, t) where Tdenotes the
time window;
3
With a predetermined velocity model, solving the wave equation with the reversed
records d(xr, T t) taken as new “source time functions” excited at the receiver loca-
tions;
Applying imaging conditions to the backpropagated wavefields Ri,(i= 1, ..., N) where
Nis the number of receivers;
Searching for the spatial and temporal locations of sources xsin the imaging result
I(x, t).
Conventional time reversal imaging employs the summation operator as an imaging con-
dition:
I(x, t) =
N
X
n=1
Ri(x, t).(1)
By searching for maximum intensities or best focusing of sources, we can obtain source images
I(x, t0) where t0denotes the origin time of the seismic event. The summation is in practice
implicit since it is equivalent to backpropagating time-reversed records d(xr, T t) at all
receivers at once. Thus, only one simulation is required with the entire dataset. However,
it surfers from low imaging resolution. Physical artifacts due to incoming wavefields from
other sources and outgoing wavefields from focused sources make it challenging to search for
source locations from low SNR dataset (Nakata and Beroza, 2016). By contrast, correlation-
based time reversal imaging considers one record at each receiver as an independent source
for backpropagation, and replaces the summation operator by multiplication:
I(x, t) =
N
Y
n=1
Ri(x, t).(2)
The correlation imaging condition greatly improves the imaging quality by suppressing ar-
tifacts in conventional time reversal imaging, as they are supposed to be zero-valued in the
resulting image. Ideally, hypocenters would only appear in I(x, t) when all the backpropa-
gated wavefields coincide in both space and time. It turns out that this imaging condition
is less sensitive to the frequency components of seismic data. However, treating each station
individually is computationally demanding and thus challenging for real-time monitoring of
seismicity.
2.2 Neural operators and U-shaped architecture
Operator learning is an emerging machine learning paradigm that aims to learn mappings
between function spaces. Recently, Li et al. (2020c); Kovachki et al. (2021) proposed neural
operators as data-driven grid-independent PDE solvers. The structure of a one-layer neural
operator shares the formula of the general solution for linear PDEs parameterized by m:
u(x) = ZGm(x,y)f(y)dy.(3)
4
Figure 1: U-shaped neural operator for time reversal modeling. The architecture contains L
Fourier neural layers: Gi, i = 1, ..., L.Pand Qare up- and down-projections parameterized
by neural networks, respectively. The input is a source time function f(x, t) sampled from a
Gaussian random field. The output is the wavefield simulated with its input as source time
function on a predetermined velocity model. The velocity model is not an implicit input but
required for simulating a training dataset with a conventional PDE solver. For the 2D wave
equation, both input and output are 3D volumes with equivalent number of grid points (2D
space and 1D time).
In seismology, Gdenotes the Green’s function of the wave equation, depending on m(i.e.
velocities discretized at x), and fis the source time function. Likewise, neural operators use
the following integral kernel operator as a basic form:
u(x)=(KV )(x) = ZK(x,y)V(y)dy,(4)
where Kdenotes kernel convolution. By sequentially stacking Llinear kernel operators
and introducing Lnon-linear activation functions σ, we can build a neural operator Nθ
parameterized by θto estimate the solution of PDEs:
Nθ:= QσL(WL+KL)... σ1(W1+K1)P, (5)
where Wdenotes a linear transform. Pis an encoder lifting the input to a high dimensional
channel space. Qis a decoder projecting the representation back to the original space.
Figure 1 shows the architecture of a U-shaped neural operator (UNO; Rahman et al.,
2022) that we use in this study. By replacing the convolutional layers in the U-net (Ron-
neberger et al., 2015) with Fourier neural operator layers (Li et al., 2020b), UNO improves
5
摘要:

AcceleratingTime-ReversalImagingwithNeuralOperatorsforReal-timeEarthquakeLocationsHongyuSun*1,YanYang1,KamyarAzizzadenesheli2,RobertW.Clayton1,andZacharyE.Ross11SeismologicalLaboratory,CaliforniaInstituteofTechnology,1200E.CaliforniaBlvd.,Pasadena,CA911252NvidiaCorporation,2788SanTomasExpressway,San...

展开>> 收起<<
Accelerating Time-Reversal Imaging with Neural Operators for Real-time Earthquake Locations Hongyu Sun1 Yan Yang1 Kamyar Azizzadenesheli2 Robert W. Clayton1.pdf

共28页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:28 页 大小:3.28MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-24

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 28
客服
关注