1 Introduction
Source locations are important for earthquake monitoring and early warning (Zhang et al.,
2021), understanding faulting properties and initiation of earthquake sequences (Ross et al.,
2020), and hazard assessment of induced seismicity during industrial injection (Lin et al.,
2020). Routine earthquake location workflows usually include phase detection, picking, as-
sociation, and location. With such a sequentially-staged workflow, the resulting source
locations heavily depend on the initial picking results. However, picking is usually done on
seismograms from each station separately and may have difficulty when the first arrivals
overlap with the coda of a larger event. Furthermore, only P and S arrivals are used in
the estimation of earthquake locations, and converted waves that are common in complex
media do not contribute to the workflow. Instead, phase pickers may erroneously consider
converted waves as first arrivals and introduce errors to the location.
With the availability of dense seismic networks and distributed acoustic sensing, we
can directly locate earthquake sources from full waveforms with time reversal imaging and
benefit from the coherency of phases between stations. With full waveforms of seismograms
instead of picked arrivals, time-reversal imaging has shown its power for revealing earthquake
locations and source mechanisms at local (Zhu et al., 2019), regional (McMechan et al., 1985;
Larmat et al., 2008), and global (Larmat et al., 2006) scales. By backpropagating time-
reversed seismograms at receiver locations, seismic-wave energies will refocus at the origins
of seismic events, provided with reasonably accurate velocity models and assumptions of non
dissipative media (McMechan, 1982; Gajewski and Tessmer, 2005; Artman et al., 2010). We
can distinguish locations and estimate their origin time by detecting the maximum intensity
or reasonable focusing in the resulting source images.
The demanding computational cost and sometimes low spatial imaging resolution hinder
the universal application of time reversal imaging from earthquake location. Conventional
time reversal imaging methods simultaneously backpropagate entire seismograms and thus
result in source images by implicitly stacking wavefields at all stations. However, such result-
ing source imaging generally suffers from low imaging resolution, which makes it challenging
to search for source locations from records with low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Most re-
cently, Sun et al. (2015); Nakata and Beroza (2016) propose a cross-correlation imaging
method to enhance the spatial resolution of time-reversal source imaging by individually ex-
trapolating wavefields at each station and then cross-correlating these wavefields. However,
the computational cost increased by this method is proportional to the number of stations,
which imposes challenges for real-time earthquake location with a dense seismic network. To
reduce the computational cost of wavefield extrapolation, researchers have grouped several
receivers and performed backward wave propagation for each group before cross-correlation
(Zhu et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2022); however, this comes at a cost of reduced
image resolution, and the choice of grouping strategy only depends on experience and is not
straightforward (Bai et al., 2022). In addition, Baker et al. (2005) directly image earthquake
source locations with Kirchhoff reconstruction of ground motions. Li et al. (2020a) approx-
imate wave-equation solutions with simplified Gaussian beam for efficient source location
with time reversal methods.
Deep learning has become state of the art for most earthquake monitoring tasks, leading
to advances in our knowledge about the Earth (Ross et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Yang et al.,
2