4
ror FAis shown in figure 2 along with a height map
of the membrane taken with a home-built white-light
interferometric microscope (WLI). Notably, the cavity
transmission in figure 2 (b) exhibits distinct bright and
dark fringes that match the shape of the height map
in figure 2 (a), evidencing the correlation between the
cavity transmission and the membrane thickness. Since
the composition of the cavity mode changes with the di-
amond thickness at a periodicity of λ/ (2nd)[39], with
nd= 2.41 the refractive index of diamond, our measure-
ments reveal the relative change of the cavity trans-
mission as a function of the hybridized mode compo-
sition. To compare the thickness change of the dia-
mond membrane obtained from the WLI measurement
to the structure observed in cavity transmission, we es-
timate the region covered by the cavity scans (see Sup-
plementary Material [35]). This region is indicated by
the blue frame in figure 2 (a). For a horizontal line
at the central y-position of this region, the WLI image
shows a thickness change of ∆WLI
h≈780 nm. Roughly
seven bright fringes along the x-axis in the central y
position of the cavity scan yield a thickness change of
∆cav
h= (7 −1) ·λ/ (2nd)≈800 nm, thus showing good
agreement with the WLI measurement.
To understand how the composition of the hybridized
cavity mode affects the cavity losses in more detail, we
proceed with measuring the cavity finesse and the mode
composition for points along a horizontal line, covering
several bright and dark fringes in figure 3 (a). As shown
in figure 3 (b), the cavity finesse spans values between
200 and 5500 and follows closely the cavity transmis-
sion measurements. In order to link each measurement
position with the character of the hybridized mode, we
investigate the dispersion of the cavity mode. To this
end, we couple light from a white-light laser (Fianium
Whitelase SC450 ) into the cavity and measure trans-
mission spectra with a spectrometer (Andor Shamrock)
for different cavity lengths. The mode character is de-
rived from the slope of the mode dispersion at the wave-
length λ= 639.7 nm of the probe laser used for the fi-
nesse measurements. Here, a steep slope corresponds
to a mode with high air-like character and a flat slope
to a mode with high diamond-like character [19]. We
define the mode character by assigning a value of 1 for
the steepest slope (air-like, A) and 0 for the lowest slope
(diamond-like, D) with corresponding values in between
(see Supplementary Material [35]).
The results are shown together with a corresponding
measurement of the finesse in figure 3 (c). The mode
character follows closely the finesse and the transmis-
sion of the cavity, proving that the losses of the cavity
are dominated by effects associated with the character
of the hybridized mode. To evidence the strong corre-
lation between the cavity losses and the mode compo-
sition again over a larger region of the membrane, we
scan the fiber similar to the lateral transmission mea-
surements across the membrane and measure the finesse
of the cavity at each position. The resulting finesse scan
in figure 3 (d) confirms the correlation between cavity
finesse and mode composition obtained along the single
line described above.
We repeat the measurement with a second fiber mir-
ror FBsince we observed high losses for the first fiber
mirror already without diamond membrane. Taken at
a slightly different position, the measurement shown in
figure 3 (e) again reflects the shape of the membrane.
The finesse spans values between ∼3000 and slightly
above 20,000, which remains lower than the value ob-
served for the cavity without membrane Fbare
max = 32,400
(see Supplementary Material [35]). To understand the
contribution of different sources of loss, we analyze a
line cut through the data shown in figure 3 (e) and fit it
with a model containing mode-dependent mirror trans-
mission, scattering losses at the diamond-air interface,
and absorption from the diamond [39], see figure 3 (f).
Therefore, we describe the finesse F= 2π/Leff with the
effective losses [39]
Leff =E2
max,a
ndE2
max,d
Lf+Lm+Lscat(σrms) + Labs(αd)(1)
Here, Lm(Lf) are the losses due to transmission at the
planar (fiber) mirror that we extract by a transfer ma-
trix model using the measured DBR-layer thicknesses
from the manufacturer. The scattering loss [39]
Lscat = sin22πndtd
λ0·(1 + nd)(1 −nd)2
nd
·4πσrms
λ02
,
(2)
originates from the diamond surface roughness σrms.
Scattering can also occur on the diamond-mirror inter-
face, depending on the termination of the mirror coat-
ing. Here, the mirror is terminated with a layer of high
refractive index, leading to a field node at the surface
such that scattering can be omitted. In addition, we
include absorption loss Labs = 2αdtddescribed by the
absorption coefficient αdof the diamond sample. For
the general grade diamond sample, which contains an
increased nitrogen concentration >100 ppb, a broad-
band absorption with αd∼0.1−0.5cm−1is expected
[41].
For all loss contributions, knowledge of the diamond
thickness and the local mode character are important.
Therefore, we evaluate a measurement of the cavity
mode dispersion at one location, i.e., the mode fre-
quency shift as a function of the mirror separation, and
fit a simulation to the measured dispersion to obtain the