
2
in [14]. Finally we explore the relation between anomalous
weak values and negativity of the corresponding Wigner func-
tion. Exploiting the analytical expression of the field’s state
obtained with the collision model, we compute the field’s con-
ditional Wigner function and we show that anomalous weak
values and Wigner function’s negativities arise for the same
values of the gate’s angle.
The paper is organized as follows: In Sec. II we describe the
coherently driven 1D atom and present the collision model of
its dynamics. In Sec. III we present our main results: the ana-
lytical derivations of the field’s conditional Husimi-Q function
and the weak value of the field’s energy change. In Sec. IV we
derive the conditional Wigner function. Finally, in Sec. Vwe
draw the conclusions of our work.
II. SYSTEM AND MODEL
A. The coherently driven 1D atom
The 1D atom comprises a qubit coupled to a single-mode,
semi-infinite waveguide. The waveguide field constitutes a
reservoir of electromagnetic modes of frequencies ωkand lin-
ear momentum k=ωkv−1with vbeing the field’s group ve-
locity taken as positive. These modes are destroyed (created)
by the operators ak(a†
k). The dynamics of the joint system is
ruled by the Hamiltonian:
H=
~ω0σ†σ+~∞
X
k=0
ωka†
kak
+i~g∞
X
k=0σ†ak−a†
kσ,(1)
where σ≡|gihe|, with |g(e)ibeing the ground (excited) state
of the emitter. Writing the above Hamiltonian we implic-
itly assumed that the light-matter interaction is weak enough
that only frequency modes close to ω0play a role (quasi-
monochromatic approximation) [17]. In this regime, the ro-
tating wave approximation is allowed [19], and the coupling g
can be considered uniform in frequency [20].
The field’s lowering operator at the position xin the inter-
action picture [16–18] is given by
b(x,t)=s1
%X
k
e−iωk(t−x/v)ak=b(0,t−x/v),(2)
where %is the modes’ density verifying the relation
Pke−iωk(t−t0)/% =δ(t−t0). The operators b(0,t) satisfy
the bosonic commutation relation, i.e. [b(0,t),b†(0,t0)] =
δ(t−t0) [17]. The qubit is located at the position x=0 of
the waveguide, such that the interaction picture Hamiltonian
reads:
HI(t)=i~√γσ†(t)b(0,t)−b†(0,t)σ(t),(3)
where we defined the interaction picture lowering operator
σ(t)=e−iω0tσ, and the emitter’s decay rate γ=g2%. In
the regions where x<0 or x>0, the field travels with-
out deformation, it is then natural to define field’s input and
output operators respectively as bin(t)≡lim→0−b(, t), and
bout(t)≡lim→0+b(, t). These operators satisfy the mean
input-output relation hbout(t)i=hbin(t)i − √γhσ(t)i, in agree-
ment with the textbook input-output relation written in the
Heisenberg representation [20].
The gate’s input field is a square coherent pulse of ampli-
tude hbin(t)i=αt=αe−iω0t/√%, with αreal. Hence, the
field’s state at the initial time (t=0−) reads |αi≡ D(α)|0i,
where D(α)=eαa†
0−α∗a0is the displacement operator of the
mode with frequency ω0which can be equivalently written as
D(α)=eRdt(αtb†(t)−α∗
tb(t))using the transformation (2). A uni-
tary driving on the qubit, HD(t), arises naturally when displac-
ing the interaction Hamiltonian in Eq. (3), D(−α)HI(t)D(α)=
HI(t)−Ωσy/2=HI(t)+HD(t), with Ω/2=gαand σy=
iσ†−iσ. In the classical limit of the field [11], the qubit
reduced dynamics is solely dictated by HD(t) and hence it re-
duces to a pure rotation around the yaxis of an angle θ= Ωτ,
where τis the duration of the qubit-field interaction. In this
limit, the light-matter interaction (int) is equivalent to the map:
|gi⊗|αiint(τ)
−−−−→ cos (θ/2) |gi+sin (θ/2) |ei⊗|αi.
Beyond the classical limit, the interaction entangles qubit
and field resulting in a loss of purity of the reduced qubit’s
state and a degradation of the coherence of the input field.
The joint qubit-field state at time τcan be written as the pure
state:
|Ψ(τ)i=qPg(τ)g, ψg(τ)E+pPe(τ)|e, ψe(τ)i
with
|ψ(τ)i=D(α)
f(0)
(τ)−Rτ
0dt f (1)
(τ, t)e−iω0tb†(t)+. . .
√P(τ)
|0i,
(4)
where =g,e, and we adopted the short notation b(t)≡
b(0,t). The state in the parenthesis is the field state in the
displaced reference frame, where the interaction Hamiltonian
is D(−α)HI(t)D(α), and the input field is the vacuum. In
such a frame, the only mechanism responsible for the pho-
tons’ creation is the spontaneous emission, hence the field
coincides with the emitter’s fluorescence having amplitude
hbout(t)i − hbin(t)i=−√γhσ(t)i. The ellipsis represent the
components with j>1 spontaneously emitted photons, hav-
ing the form (−)jRdtjf(j)
(τ, tj)e−iω0t1b†(t1)..e−iω0tjb†(tj)|0i,
with tj={t1,t2, ...tj}. The functions f(j)
(τ, tj) are real and
their explicit expression has been derived in [18] and is re-
ported in the App. A. Since their amplitude is proportional
to γj/2, the components with j>2 can be neglected in
the regime usually considered in single-qubit gates where
Ωγ. We can define the probability that the qubit spon-
taneously emits jphotons during the evolution from |gito |i
as p(j)
(τ)≡Rdtj|f(j)
(τ, tj)|2/P(τ).
B. Collision model of the coherently driven 1D atom
We now define adimensional discrete-temporal modes of
the electromagnetic field [16–18], i.e. bn≡√∆tb(tn), where