
L2 L. V. Barkhudaryan
selected the spectroscopically classified SN Ia subclasses (normal,
91T- and 91bg-like) with distances 6200 Mpc from the Open Su-
pernova Catalog (Guillochon et al. 2017). In order to have high con-
fidence on the SN subclasses, the information is additionally ver-
ified utilizing data from the Weizmann Interactive Supernova data
REPository (Yaron & Gal-Yam 2012), Astronomer’s Telegram, web-
site of the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, etc.1
Since we are interested in SNe Ia that exploded in highly inclined
spiral galaxies, we need to roughly classify the morphology and esti-
mate the inclination of hosts. To perform this we employed the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16 (DR16; Ahumada et al. 2020),
the SkyMapper DR2 (Onken et al. 2019), and the Pan-STARRS DR2
(Chambers et al. 2016), which together cover the whole sky and pro-
vide the gri bands composed images for each host galaxy. Hosts
with visible low inclinations (i∼
<60◦)and obviously elliptical,
lenticular, or irregular morphology were excluded from the study.
Following H20, we further morphologically classified the hosts and
created the 25 mag arcsec−2elliptical apertures for each galaxy on
the surveys’ g-band images enabling exact measurements of the SN
hosts’ inclinations, semi-major (R25)and semi-minor (Z25)axes.
The next step was to use the estimated elongations (R25/Z25)and
morphological types of galaxies to calculate inclinations, following
the approach of Paturel et al. (1997). It is worth noting that the cal-
culated inclinations for galaxies with prominent bulges are inaccu-
rate, as the isophotes of bulges in highly inclined galaxies reduce the
real galaxy disc inclinations. Such scenarios got special attention for
exact inclination calculation, with only the isophotes of discs be-
ing taken into account (see H17). Finally, we limited the sample of
host galaxies to those with an inclination of 80◦6i690◦. As
a result, we sampled 196 S0/a–Sdm galaxies with a nearly edge-on
view, where a total of 197 SNe Ia were discovered (Table A1).
It is important to test the representativeness of our edge-on SN
host sample compared to a sample of galaxies arbitrarily aligned
along line-of-sight. Using the two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov
(KS) and Anderson–Darling (AD) tests,2we compared the distri-
butions of the sampled SN Ia subclasses and the morphological
types of their hosts with the same distributions of nearly complete
volume-limited (680 Mpc) sample of the Lick Observatory Super-
nova Search (LOSS; Li et al. 2011). In our and LOSS samples, the
representations of SN Ia subclasses are not statistically different (the
probabilities that the distributions are drawn from the same parent
sample are >0.6). The frequencies of morphologies in our and
LOSS samples are also consistent between each other (probabilities
are >0.1). Therefore, any artificial loss or excess of SN subclasses
and/or host’s morphologies should be not significant in our sample.
We used the methods described in our earlier study on edge-on
SN hosts (H17) to determine the height (V)of a SN from the plane
of its host disc (i.e. the vertical distance of a SN from the major
axis of host), as well as the projected radius (U)along the plane.
The g-band images were used for these measurements. The values
of Uand Vare given in arcsec units. In this study, we used the R25
normalization (in arcsec) to bring the galaxies to relatively the same
size (normalized height is V/R25, normalized projected radius is
U/R25 ). For more details on the measurement techniques, the reader
is referred to Hakobyan et al. (2016), H17. In the Appendix, we also
applied Z25 normalization to the Vparameter (V/Z25).
Recall that the galaxies in our sample have an inclination of
80◦−90◦, which can introduce discrepancies in (projected) height
1The sources provide also the equatorial coordinates of the selected SNe Ia.
2We used a 5 per cent significance level as the threshold for the tests.
Table 1. Comparison of the positional distributions of the SN Ia subclasses
along major Uand minor Vaxes.
SN NSN h|U|/R25iversus h|V|/R25iPMC
KS PMC
AD
Normal 144 0.28+0.05
−0.04 versus 0.07+0.01
−0.01 <0.001 <0.001
91T 30 0.25+0.12
−0.07 versus 0.05+0.03
−0.02 <0.001 <0.001
91bg 23 0.25+0.15
−0.08 versus 0.14+0.08
−0.04 0.022 0.145
All 197 0.27+0.04
−0.03 versus 0.07+0.01
−0.01 <0.001 <0.001
Notes. The PKS and PAD probabilities that the distributions are drawn
from the same parent sample are calculated using a MC simulation with 105
iterations. Each subsample’s mean values with their 95 per cent confidence
intervals (CIs) are presented. The P-values are bolded when differences
between the distributions are statistically significant (P60.05).
measurements when compared to physical heights in the same galax-
ies with inclination of 90◦. To check the impact of this effect, using
a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, we generated 1000 SN heights in
i= 90◦disc adopting a generalized vertical distribution (f(˜z) =
sech2(˜z/˜z0), where ˜z=V/R25)and its scale heights for SNe Ia in
spiral galaxies (˜z0= 0.083;H17). Then, we randomly assigned an
inclination within 80◦−90◦to the disc for each SN and estimated
the projected SN height from the major axis of the host. Eventu-
ally, the comparison of the generated and projected heights showed
that the differences between them is not significant (PKS = 0.130,
PAD = 0.200). Thus, the mentioned effect has a minor impact on
the real height measurements, which accounts, on average, for about
10 per cent of the measured value (±0.01 in absolute units, typically
within the range of measurement errors).
Because we aim to investigate the possible relationships between
photometric features like ∆m15 and the heights of SNe Ia from the
disc, following H20, we conducted a thorough literature search to
assemble the B-band LC decline rates for our 197 SNe. Only 69 of
the SNe Ia in our sample have available ∆m15 values.
Table A5 provides our database of 197 individual SNe Ia (SN
designation, Uand V, spectroscopic subclass and ∆m15 with their
sources) and their 196 hosts (galaxy designation, distance, morpho-
logical type, R25, and Z25 ).
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Directional distributions of SNe Ia in edge-on spiral hosts
Following Hakobyan et al. (2021), for the SNe Ia in edge-on spi-
rals of the current study, we perform the two-sample KS and AD
tests comparing the |V|/R25 and |U|/R25 distributions between
each other. Table 1shows that the bulk of SNe Ia in all of the SN
subclasses are localized in the host galaxies’ discs. For 91bg-like
SNe only, the AD test shows barely significance, unlike the KS test,
which is probably due to the statistics with the smallest sample size.
We then compare the projected and normalized radii |U|/R25 and
the heights |V|/R25 between different SN Ia subclasses. In Table 2,
the KS and AD tests show that the radial distributions of normal,
91T- and 91bg-like SNe are consistent with one another. In addition,
the height distributions of normal and 91T-like SNe are consistent
between each other. At the same time, the height distributions of
91T- and 91bg-like SNe are significantly different. The same is hap-
pens for the distributions of normal and 91bg-like SNe (with barely
KS test significance). Fig. 1shows a scatterplot of |V|/R25 versus
|U|/R25, and the cumulative distributions of |V|/R25 values for dif-
ferent SN Ia subclasses. The 91T-like SNe have the smallest height
distributions, closest to the disc plane, whereas the 91bg-like SNe
MNRAS 000,1–6(2022)