Digital Discovery Workshops are designed for Pre K-12 graders joining from classrooms, after-school
settings, library programs, or other community groups.
Costs & Booking
● 1-99 participants: $250
● 100-199 participants: $350
● 200-299 participants: $450
● 300+ participants: $550
Qualified low-income schools may receive up to 100% off Digital Discovery Workshops rates. Programs
should be booked at least 2 weeks in advance. We book on a rolling calendar year so we can schedule as far in
advance as you like!
How They Work
● PacSci educators send you a private Zoom link, or join a virtual platform of your choice.
● PacSci educators guide participants through demonstrations and activities as they facilitate active student
participation.
● Each program includes an optional follow-along worksheet, as well as connected extension activities,
reading lists, and videos to use before and after the program.
What You Will Need
● One shared device with a large screen and speakers or individual devices
● Internet connection
● Access to your selected virtual platform, such as Zoom
● A webcam and microphone on participant device(s)
● An adult must be present to provide aid for the participant
21. How much should a group of 310 participants pay for a Digital Discovery Workshop?
A. $250. B. $350. C. $450. D. $550.
22. How do participants learn in the Digital Discovery Workshops?
A. Through watching mailed videos. B. Through live educator guidance.
C. By reading scientific books. D. By participating in community activities.
23. Who is required to accompany and help the participants besides the PacSci educators?
A. A pre K-12 grader. B. A low-income student.
C. An adult. D. An active junior student.
B
Growing up, I disliked writing. It was the last thing I wanted to do and it’s one reason why I pursued science
in the first place. In high school, I hated writing essays. For hours, I stared at blank pages, trying to turn my
disordered thoughts into fluent sentences and I often received papers marked with lots of corrections. I began to
wonder if I was simply not cut out for writing. And that was OK. I didn’t have to be good at everything.
I focused instead on my love for math and science. I took comfort there, knowing objective truth could be
found if I searched methodically. In college, I studied engineering and joined a research lab to gain hands-on
experience. My first project was to improve the efficiency of a magnetic component. Despite initial disappointing
results, I continued through many designs. Eventually, we developed a design that halved energy losses. I was
delighted — until my professor told me to write that research paper.
I knew that if I wanted to become a researcher, I would need to spend time penning papers. But I was scared
of failing. In a panic, I asked a graduate student in my lab for help. We set a goal for the paper, and I carefully
wrote an outline. But when I asked him for feedback ( 反馈), I soon found the paper covered in red marks. He
explained that red didn’t mean I was a bad writer. Writing isn’t a one-and-done thing. It requires revising your
work, often several times. Suddenly it occurred to me, “Hadn’t I done the same thing when I was searching for an