INTRODUCTION
These are stories I have written with other writers. Collaborations, they’re called. They are the
products of two minds working together, sometimes in complete harmony, more often in opposition. The
former, because the ideas were so right they needed no conflict to produce a coherent whole; the latter,
because writers are perverse creatures who enjoy tormenting one another. And also, conscious opposition
on the part of one of the collaborators, to the direction a story is taking naturally, may produce a stress that
bends it unexpectedly in a to ally unpredictable way. And from that can come a toad prince or a toad,
depending on whether or not both writers know how to handle a fable run amuck.
The beloved Lester del Rey--one of my early mentors in the craft of professional lying-told me
once : never write a story with someone, that you can do as well by yourself. Well, I believe that. I tried
writing a novel with Avram Davidson once, titled “Don’t Speak of Rope,” Ech. One of the most horrible
experiences in a universe filled with death camps, hardhats, campus massacres and the human gamut that
runs from Spiro to Manson; somewhere in a file drawer languish ten thousand words of that novel, unended,
unlamented, unfortunate. So I do, I really do, agree with Lester.
Even so, life can occasionally become dull and predictable, and so, to spice it slightly, those of us
with a flair for danger and high adventure take guided tours through the heart of Mt. Vesuvius, stalk the
blood-sucking vampire bat through the swamps and fens of Bosnia and/or Herzogovina, join peace rallies,
date beautiful models and, when all else fails, collaborate on fictions with other writers. I grant you the
picture of world-weariness and jaded appetite I paint, the desperation of ennui that drives men to such
hideous extremes as collaboration, is an ugly one. But I feel you must know what horrors and pitfalls lie
behind this seemingly uncomplicated act. Ask Avram. Ech.
But the reward of successful collaboration is a thing that cannot be produced by either of the
parties working alone. It is akin to the benefits of sex with a partner, as opposed to masturbation. The latter
is fun, but you show me anyone who has gotten a baby from playing with him or herself, and I’ll show you
an ugly baby, with just a whole bunch of knuckles.
And so, risking the hisses and catcalls of overly critical readers and critics who will call these joint
efforts (if you’ll pardon my carrying on the allusion from the preceding paragraph) merely gimmicky
constructs, over the past many years I have yoked myself to fourteen other writers, and from these literary
miscegenations have come the fictions before you.
My relationships with all of these men have been substantially more than what might be termed
mere acquaintanceship. All of them are my friends, but not all of them like me. Nor do I like all of them.
Many of them have done me favors I would be hard-pressed to repay in full or in kind. Others have messed
me over hideously. From time to time I have been in serious disagreement with one or another of them.
Between one of them and myself there was a shadow for many years. Between myself and another is
something very much like the love of one brother for another. One saved my life, literally. I thought another
had ruined it. One made me terribly proud of him, and then sold out, thereby destroying all my illusions
about him. Two of them managed to alter the course and texture of my life. From one I learned much
about the nature of love, from another the nature of hate. With one I dreamed odd dreams, and with
another I learned people can only act as people, not as gods. One demonstrated there can be nobility even in
failure, and another showed me how badly success can be handled.
Millions of words of conversation in the past nineteen years have passed between me and these
fourteen men. Advice, shoptalk, problems, respect and denunciation. That is the nature of friendship.
But without these men, I would never have come to write the solo stories on which my
reputation--however great or small it may be--is based. Without all the words they have given the world on
their own, some larger part of the joy of having been a part of speculative fiction would never have been.
Bloch and his psychos and the Ripper; Bova’s clear view of the importance of space travel; Budrys and the
Gus nobody bothers; Davidson and his sentient coathangers; Delany and frelking; Hensley and his son,
Randy; Laumer and Retief; Rotsler and a stack of cartoons only slightly smaller than Everest; Sheckley and
all his dimensions of wonder; Silverberg and thorns; Slesar and the greatest short-story ever written;
Sturgeon and...well, everything; Van Vogt and weapon shops and Jommy Cross and the cortical thalamic
pause; Zelazny and he who shapes.
All of them are masters, each of them writes only as he can write, and no two can ever be confused
in the minds of students of masterful sf. These are the extra special meanings for me of these
superimportant people:
Laumer is strength, and Davidson is erudition, and Budrys is empathy, and Delany is youthful