The Secret Team - By Fletcher Prouty

VIP免费
2024-12-05 0 0 1.66MB 466 页 5.9玖币
侵权投诉
back to JFK | ratville times | rat haus | Index | Search
( ASCII text format )
THE SECRET TEAM
The CIA
and Its Allies
in Control of the United
States and the World
L. FLETCHER PROUTY
Col., U.S. Air Force (Ret.)
Copyright © 1973, 1992, 1997 by L. Fletcher Prouty
All Rights Reserved
March 1997:
This 1997 edition of the book is
available in its entirety on Len Osanic's
rip-roaring 1997 CD-ROM, The
Collected Works of Col. L. Fletcher Prouty along with ~600MB of 70+
articles, 100 images, 30 topics and 6 hours of audio material. Read all
about it and how to order your own copy by going to:
http://www.prouty.org/
Here on ratical we will be hooking up the rest of the book in HTML and
ASCII formats over the next 7 months. Each month will see the following
chapters come online:
May: Chapters 3-6
June: Chapters 7-10
July: Chapters 11-15
August: Chapters 16-19
September: Chapters 20-23
October: Appendices I-III
The online copy of this book was made possible by the efforts and
generosity of Len Osanic. We thank him for his support. Be sure to check
out the details on the complete CD if you are interested in this book. There
is a great deal to recommend it for anyone who wants to study the
writings, interviews and perceptions of Colonel Prouty. The significance
of Prouty's level and depth of first-hand experience of World War II and
direct participation in the ensuing birth and rise of the National Security
State is provided in great detail on The Collected Works CD.
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Author's Note
Preface
Preface to the Second Edition
Preface: "THE SECRET TEAM II" 1997
PART I THE SECRET TEAM
Chapter 1 The "Secret Team" -- the Real Power Structure
Chapter 2 The Nature of Secret Team Activity: A Cuban Case Study
PART II THE CIA: HOW IT RUNS
Chapter 3 An Overview of the CIA
Section I. Intelligence versus Secret Operations
Section II. Origins of the Agency and
the Seeds of Secret Operations
Section III. A Simple Coup d'État to a Global Mechanism
Chapter 4 From the Word of the Law to the Interpretation:
President Kennedy Attempts to Put the CIA Under Control
Chapter 5 "Defense" as a National Military Philosophy,
the Natural Prey of the Intelligence Community
Chapter 6 "It Shall Be the Duty of the Agency: To Advise, to Coordinate,
to Correlate and Evaluate and Disseminate
and to Perform Services of Common Concern . . ."
Coordination of Intelligence -- the
Major Assigned Role of the CIA
Correlation, Evaluation and Dissemination of
Intelligence: Heart of the Profession
Services of Common Concern: An Attempt at Efficiency
Chapter 7 From the Pines of Maine to the Birches of Russia:
The Nature of Clandestine Operations
Chapter 8 CIA: "The Cover Story" Intelligence Agency
and the Real-Life Clandestine Operator
Chapter 9 The Coincidence of Crises
Chapter 10 The Dulles-Jackson-Correa Report in Action
PART III THE CIA: HOW IT IS ORGANIZED
Chapter 11 The Dulles Era Begins
Chapter 12 Personnel: The Chameleon Game
Chapter 13 Communications: The Web of the World
Chapter 14 Transportation: Anywhere in the World -- Now
Chapter 15 Logistics by Miracle
PART IV THE CIA: SOME EXAMPLES
THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
Chapter 16 Cold War: The Pyrrhic Gambit
Chapter 17 Mission Astray, Soviet Gamesmanship
Chapter 18 Defense, Containment, and Anti-Communism
Chapter 19 The New Doctrine: Special Forces and
the Penetration of the Mutual Security Program
Chapter 20 Khrushchev's Challenge: The U-2 Dilemma
Chapter 21 A Time of Covert Action: U-2 to Kennedy Inaugural
Chapter 22 Camelot: From the Bay of Pigs to Dallas, Texas
Chapter 23 Five Presidents: "Nightmares We Inherited"
APPENDICES:
I. Definition of Special Operations
II. Powers and Duties of the CIA
III. Training Under the Mutual Security Program
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
( ASCII text format )
b
ack to JF
K
| ratville times | rat haus | Index | Search
N
ext | ToC
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
. . . to Len Osanic and all at Bandit Productions for bringing all my work
back to life.
. . . to Patrick Fourmy, Dave Ratcliffe and Tom Davis, old friends who
have insisted I revise and re-write this old "classic".
. . . to Bill Mullan, Charlie Czapar, Bill Peters, and Dave Fleming, who
worked with me in the Pentagon during the fifties, for those fascinating
years with "Team B" in Headquarters, U.S. Air Force.
. . . to Charles Peters of The Washington Monthly for publishing the first
"Secret Team" article, and Derek Shearer for breathing the whole concept
into life.
. . . to General Graves B. (the big "E") Erskine and General Victor H.
("Brute") Krulak, both of the U. S. Marine Corps, my immediate "bosses"
and good friends, in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and in the
Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for close personal relationships that
shaped the course of these events.
. . . and to the hundreds of men with whom I shared these experiences and
who must remain nameless and silent because that is the "code" of their
chosen profession.
N
ext | ToC
b
ack to JF
K
| ratville times | rat haus | Index | Search
N
ext | ToC | Prev
PREFACE 1972
From President to Ambassador, Cabinet Officer to Commanding
General, and from Senator to executive assistant-all these men have their
sources of information and guidance. Most of this information and
guidance is the result of carefully laid schemes and ploys of pressure
groups.In this influential coterie one of the most interesting and effective
roles is that played by the behind the scenes, faceless, nameless,
ubiquitous briefing officer.
He is the man who sees the President, the Secretary, the Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff almost daily, and who carries with him the
most skillfully detailed information. He is trained by years of experience
in the precise way to present that information to assure its effectiveness.
He comes away day after day knowing more and more about the man he
has been briefing and about what it is that the truly influential pressure
groups at the center of power and authority are really trying to tell these
key decision makers. In Washington, where such decisions shape and
shake the world, the role of the regular briefing officer is critical.
Leaders of government and of the great power centers regularly leak
information of all kinds to columnists, television and radio commentators,
and to other media masters with the hope that the material will surface and
thus influence the President, the Secretary, the Congress, and the public.
Those other inside pressure groups with their own briefing officers have
direct access to the top men; they do not have to rely upon the media,
although they make great use of it. They are safe and assured in the
knowledge that they can get to the decision maker directly. They need no
middleman other than the briefing officer. Such departments as Defense,
State, and the CIA use this technique most effectively.
For nine consecutive, long years during those crucial days from
1955 through January 1, 1964, I was one of those briefing officers. I had
the unique assignment of being the "Focal Point" officer for contacts
between the CIA and the Department of Defense on matters pertaining to
the military support of the Special Operations[1] of that Agency. In that
capacity I worked with Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles, several
Secretaries of Defense, and Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well
as many others in key governmental places. My work took me to more
than sixty countries and to CIA offices and covert activities all over the
worl
d
--from such hot s
p
ots as Sai
g
on and to such remote
p
laces as the
South Pole. Yes, there have been secret operations in Antarctica.
It was my job not only to brief these men, but to brief them from the
point of view of the CIA so that I might win approval of the projects
presented and of the accompanying requests for support from the military
in terms of money, manpower, facilities, and materials. I was, during this
time, perhaps the best informed "Focal Point" officer among the few who
operated in this very special area. The role of the briefing officer is quiet,
effective, and most influential; and, in the CIA, specialized in the high art
of top level indoctrination.
It cannot be expected that a John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, a
Richard Nixon, or a following President will have experienced and learned
all the things that may arise to confront him during his busy official life in
the White House. It cannot be expected that a Robert McNamara or a
Melvin Laird, a Dean Rusk or a William Rogers, etc. comes fully
equipped to high office, aware of all matters pertaining to what they will
encounter in their relationship with the Congo or Cuba, Vietnam or
Pakistan, and China or Russia and the emerging new nations. These men
learn about these places and the many things that face them from day to
day from an endless and unceasing procession of briefing officers.
Henry Kissinger was a briefing officer. General John Vogt was one
of the best. Desmond Fitzgerald, Tracy Barnes, Ed Lansdale, and "Brute"
Krulak, in their own specialties, were top-flight briefing officers on
subjects that until the publication of the "Pentagon Papers," few people
had ever seen in print or had ever even contemplated.
(You can imagine my surprise when I read the June 13, 1971, issue
of the Sunday New York Times and saw there among the "Pentagon
Papers" a number of basic information papers that had been in my own
files in the Joint Chiefs of Staff area of the Pentagon. Most of the papers
of that period had been source documents from which I had prepared
dozens -- even hundreds -- of briefings, for all kinds of projects, to be
given to top Pentagon officers. Not only had many of those papers been in
my files, but I had either written many of them myself or had written
certain of the source documents used by the men who did.)
The briefing officer, with the staff officer, writes the basic papers.
He researches the papers. He has been selected because he has the
required knowledge and experience. He has been to the countries and to
the places involved. He may know the principals in the case well. He is
supposed to be the best man available for that special job. In my own case,
I had been on many special assignments dating back to the Cairo and
Teheran conferences of late 1943 that first brought together the "Big Four"
of the Allied nations of WW II: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill,
Chiang Kai-shek and Joseph Stalin.
The briefing officer reads all of the messages, regardless of
classification. He talks to a number of other highly qualified men. He may
even have staff s
p
ecialists s
p
read out all over the world u
p
on whom he
may call at any time for information. Working in support of the "Focal
Point" office, which I headed, there were hundreds of experts and agents
concealed in military commands throughout the world who were part of a
network I had been directed to establish in 1955-1956 as a stipulation of
National Security Council directive 5412, March 1954.
In government official writing, the man who really writes the paper-
-or more properly, the men whose original work and words are put
together to become the final paper--are rarely, if ever, the men whose
names appear on that paper. A paper attributed to Maxwell Taylor, Robert
McNamara or Dean Rusk, of the Kennedy era, would not, in almost all
instances, have been written by them; but more than likely would have
been assembled from information gathered from the Departments of
Defense and State and from CIA sources and put into final language by
such a man as General Victor H. Krulak, who was among the best of that
breed of official writers.
From l955 through 1963, if some official wanted a briefing on a
highly classified subject involving the CIA, I would be one of those called
upon to prepare the material and to make the briefing. At the same time, if
the CIA wanted support from the Air Force for some covert operation, I
was the officer who had been officially designated to provide this special
operational support to the CIA.
If I was contacted by the CIA to provide support for an operation
which I believed the Secretary of Defense had not been previously
informed of, I would see to it that he got the necessary briefing from the
CIA or from my office and that any other Chief of Staff who might be
involved would get a similar briefing. In this unusual business I found
rather frequently that the CIA would be well on its way into some
operation that would later require military support before the Secretary
and the Chiefs had been informed.
During preparations for one of the most important of these
operations, covered in some detail in this book, I recall briefing the
chairman of the Joint Chief's of Staff, General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, on the
subject of the largest clandestine special operation that the CIA had ever
mounted up to that time: and then hearing him say to the other Chiefs, "I
just can't believe it. I never knew that."
Here was the nation's highest ranking military officer, the man who
would be held responsible for the operation should it fail or become
compromised, and he had not been told enough about it to know just how
it was being handled. Such is the nature of the game as played by the
"Secret Team."
I have written for several magazines on this subject, among them the
Armed Forces Journal, The New Republic, the Empire Magazine of the
Denver Sunday Post, and The Washington Monthly. It was for this latter
publication that I wrote "The Secret Team", an article that appeared in the
Ma
y
1970 issue and that led to the develo
p
ment of this book.
With the publication of the "Pentagon Papers" on June 13,1971,
interest in this subject area was heightened and served to underscore my
conviction that the scope of that article must be broadened into a book.
Within days of The New York Times publication of those "Pentagon
Papers," certain editorial personnel with the BBC-TV program, "Twenty-
Four Hours", recalling my "Secret Team" article, invited me to appear on a
series on TV with, among others, Daniel Ellsberg. They felt that my
experience with the Secret Team would provide material for an excellent
companion piece to the newly released "Pentagon Papers," which were to
be the primary topic of the discussions. I flew to London and made a
number of programs for BBC-TV and Radio. Legal problems and the
possible consequences of his departure from the country at that time
precluded the simultaneous appearance of Daniel Ellsberg. The programs
got wide reception and served to underscore how important the subject of
the "Pentagon Papers" is throughout the world.
I have not chosen to reveal and to expose "unreleased" classified
documents; but I do believe that those that have been revealed, both in the
"Pentagon Papers" and elsewhere, need to be interpreted and fully
explained. I am interested in setting forth and explaining what "secrecy"
and the "cult of containment" really mean and what they have done to our
way of life and to our country. Furthermore, I want to correct any
disinformation that may have been given by those who have tried to write
on these subjects in other related histories.
I have lived this type of work; I know what happened and how it
happened. I have known countless men who participated in one way or
another in these unusual events of Twentieth Century history. Many of
these men have been and still are members of the Secret Team. It also
explains why much of it has been pure propaganda and close to
nationwide "brainwashing" of the American public. I intend to interpret
and clarify these events by analyzing information already in the public
domain. There is plenty.
Few concepts during this half century have been as important, as
controversial, as misunderstood, and as misinterpreted as secrecy in
Government. No idea during this period has had a greater impact upon
Americans and upon the American way of life than that of the containment
of Communism. Both are inseparably intertwined and have nurtured each
other in a blind Pavlovian way. Understanding their relationship is a
matter of fundamental importance.
Much has been written on these subjects and on their vast
supporting infrastructure, generally known as the "intelligence
community." Some of this historical writing has suffered from a serious
lack of inside knowledge and experience. Most of this writing has been
done by men who know something about the subject, by men who have
researched and learned something about the subject, and in a few cases by
men who had some experience with the subject. Rarely is there enough
factual ex
p
erience on the
p
art of the writer. On the other hand, the
Government and other special interests have paid writers huge amounts to
write about this subject as they want it done, not truthfully. Thus our
history is seriously warped and biased by such work.
Many people have been so concerned about what has been
happening to our Government that they have dedicated themselves to
investigating and exposing its evils. Unfortunately, a number of these
writers have been dupes of those cleverer than they or with sinister reasons
for concealing knowledge. They have written what they thought was the
truth, only to find out (if they ever did find out) that they had been fed a
lot of contrived cover stories and just plain hogwash. In this book I have
taken extracts from some of this writing and, line by line, have shown how
it has been manipulated to give a semblance of truth while at the same
time being contrived and false.
Nevertheless, there have been some excellent books in this broad
area. But many of these books suffer from various effects of the dread
disease of secrecy and from its equally severe corollary illness called
"cover" (the CIA's official euphemism for not telling the truth).
The man who has not lived in the secrecy and intelligence
environment--really lived in it and fully experienced it--cannot write
accurately about it. There is no substitute for the day to day living of a life
in which he tells his best friends and acquaintances, his family and his
everyday contacts one story while he lives another. The man who must
depend upon research and investigation inevitably falls victim to the many
pitfalls of the secret world and of the "cover story" world with its lies and
counter-lies.
A good example of this is the work of Les Gelb and his Pentagon
associates on the official version of the purloined "Pentagon Papers." That
very title is the biggest cover story (no pun intended) of them all; so very
few of those papers were really of Pentagon origin. The fact that I had
many of them in my office of Special Operations in Joint Staff area, and
that most of them had been in the files of the office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs did not validate the
locale of their origin. They were "working copies" and not originals.
Notice how few were signed by true military officers.
It is significant to note that the historical record that has been called
the "Pentagon Papers" was actually a formal government-funded "study of
the history of United States involvement in Vietnam from World War II to
the present" i.e. 1945 to 1968. On June 17, 1967 the Secretary of Defense,
Robert S. McNamara directed that work. A task force consisting of "six
times six professionals" under the direction of Leslie H. Gelb produced
"37 studies and 15 collections of documents in 43 volumes" that were
presented on January 15, 1969 to the then-Secretary of Defense, Clark M.
Clifford by Mr. Gelb with the words from Herman Melville's Moby Dick:
"This is a world of chance, free will, and necessity-all
interweavin
g
l
y
workin
g
to
g
ether as one: chance b
y
turn rules either and
摘要:

backtoJFK|ratvilletimes|rathaus|Index|Search(ASCIItextformat)THESECRETTEAMTheCIAandItsAlliesinControloftheUnitedStatesandtheWorldL.FLETCHERPROUTYCol.,U.S.AirForce(Ret.)Copyright©1973,1992,1997byL.FletcherProutyAllRightsReservedMarch1997:This1997editionofthebookisavailableinitsentiretyonLenOsanic'sri...

展开>> 收起<<
The Secret Team - By Fletcher Prouty.pdf

共466页,预览10页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:外语学习 价格:5.9玖币 属性:466 页 大小:1.66MB 格式:PDF 时间:2024-12-05

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 466
客服
关注