3 Tula
“Throw back your hoods, pull down your veils, females!” laughed the wagoner.
The women crowding about the back of the wagon, many with their hands
outstretched, the sleeves of their robes falling back, cried out in consternation.
“—if you would be fed!” he added.
These women must be new, I thought. Probably they had come only recently to the
wagons, probably trekking overland from some contacted village, perhaps one from as far
away as fifty pasangs, a common range for the excursions, the searches and collections of
mounted foragers. Most of the women I had seen following the wagons, at any rate, knew
enough by now to approach them only bareheaded, as female supplicants, too, to be more
pleasing to the men who might possibly be persuaded to feed them, with their hair visible and
loose as that of slaves. Similarly, most had already discarded or hidden their veils, even when
not begging. They did not even wear them in their own small, foul, often-fireless makeshift
camps near the wagons, camps, to be sure, to which men might sometimes come. It had been
discovered that a woman who is seen with a veil, even if she has lowered the veil, abjectly
and piteously face-stripping herself, is less likely to be fed than one with no veil in evidence.
Too, of course, it had been quickly noted that such women, too, tended to be less frequently
selected for the pleasure of the drivers. The men with the wagons had not seen fit to permit
the women the dignity of veiling. In this, of course, they treated them like slaves. “Please!”
cried a woman, thrusting back her hood and (pg. 24) tearing away her veil. “Feed me! Please,
feed me!’ The others, too, then almost instantly, hastily, each seeming to hurry to be before
the others, some moaning and crying out in misery, unhooded and unveiled themselves.
“That is better, females,” laughed the driver.
Many of the women moaned and wept.
They were now, to be sure, I mused, in their predicament and helplessness, even
though free women, as the driver had implied, little more then mere females. One could
probably not be more a female unless one was a slave.
“Feed us!” they cried piteously to the driver, many of them with their arms
outstretched, their hands lifted, their palms opened, crowding and pressing about the back of
the wagon. “We beg food!” “We are hungry!” “Please!” “Feed us, please!” “Please!”
I looked at their faces. On the whole they seemed to be simple, plain women, peasant
women, and peasant lasses. One or two of them, I thought, might be suitable for the collar.
“Here!” cried the driver, laughing, throwing pieces of bread from a sack to one and
then another of the women. The first piece of bread he threw to the woman who had been the
first to unhood and face-strip herself, perhaps thereby rewarding her for her intelligence and
alacrity. He then threw pieces to certain others of the women, generally to those who were the
prettiest and begged the hardest. Sometimes, not unoften, these pieces of bread were torn
away from the prettier, more feminine women by their brawnier, huskier, more masculine
fellows. Where there are no men, or no true men, to protect them, feminine women will, in a
grotesque perversion of nature, be controlled, exploited and dominated by more masculine
women, sometimes monsters and mere caricatures of men. Yet even such grosser women,
sometimes little more than surrogates for males, can upon occasion, in the hands of a strong
uncompromising master, be forced to manifest and fulfil, realizing then for the first time, the
depths of their long-denied, long-suppressed womanness. There are two sexes. They are not
the same.
“More, more, please!” begged the females.
Then, amusing himself, the driver tossed some bits of (pg. 25) bread into the air and
watched the desperate, anxious women crowd and bunch under it, pushing and shoving for
position, and trying to leap upward, thrusting at one another, to snatch at it.
“More, please!” they screamed.