northwest European extraction, I’m sure). There were lots of different intelligences in Campbell’s Galaxy, but the
leaders were Arcot, Wade, and Morey, who were Earthmen (of northwest European extraction, I’m sure).
Well, in 1940, I wrote a story called “Homo Sol”, which appeared in the September 1940 issue of Astounding
Science Fiction. I, too, had a Galactic Federation composed of innumerable different intelligences, but I had no brief
for northwest Europeans. I was of East European extraction myself and my kind was being trampled into oblivion by
a bunch of northwest Europeans. I was therefore not intent on making Earthmen superior. The hero of the story was
from Rigel and Earthmen were definitely a bunch of second-raters.
Well, Campbell wouldn’t allow it. Earthmen had to be superior to all others, no matter what. He forced me to make
some changes and then made some himself, and I was frustrated. On the one hand, I wanted to write my stories
without interference; on the other hand, I wanted to sell to Campbell. What to do?
I wrote a sequel to “Homo Sol”, a story called “The Imaginary”, in which only the aliens appeared. No Earthmen.
Campbell rejected it; it appeared in the November 1942 issue of Superscience Stories.
Then inspiration struck. If I wrote human/alien stories, Campbell would not let me be. If I wrote alien-only stories,
Campbell would reject them. So why not write human-only stories. I did. When I got around to making another
serious attempt at dealing with a Galactic society, I made it an all-human Galaxy and Campbell had no objections at
all. Mine was the first such Galaxy in science fiction history, as far as I know, and it proved phenomenally
successful, for I wrote my Foundation (and related) novels on that basis.
The first such story was “Foundation” itself, which appeared in the May 1942 Astounding Science Fiction.
Meanwhile, it had also occurred to me that I could write robot stories for Campbell. I didn’t mind having Earthmen
superior to robots—at least just at first. The first robot story that Campbell took was “Reason”, which appeared in the
April 1941 Astounding Science Fiction. Those stories, too, proved very popular, and presuming upon their
popularity, I gradually made my robots better and wiser and more decent than human beings and Campbell continued
to take them.
This continued even after Campbell’s death, and now I can’t think of a recent robot story in which my robot isn’t far
better than the human beings he must deal with. I think of “Bicentennial Man”, “Robot Dreams”, “Too Bad” and,
most of all, I think of R. Daneel and R. Giskard in my robot novels.
But the decision I made in the heat of World War II and in my resentment of Campbell’s assumption have stayed
with me. My Galaxy is still all-human, and my robots still meet only humans.
This doesn’t mean that (always assuming I live long enough) it’s not possible I may violate this habit of mine in the
future. The ending of my novel Foundation and Earth makes it conceivable that in the sequel I may introduce aliens
and that R. Daneel will have to deal with them. That’s not a promise because actually I haven’t the faintest idea of
what’s going to happen in the sequel, but it is at least conceivable that aliens may intrude on my close-knit human
societies.
(Naturally, I repel, with contempt, any suggestion that I don’t introduce aliens into my stories because I “can’t handle
them.” In fact, my chief reason for writing my novel The Gods Themselves was to prove to anyone who felt he
needed the proof, that I could, too, handle aliens. No one can doubt that I proved it, but I must admit that even in The
Gods Themselves, the aliens and the human beings didn’t actually meet face-to-face.)
But let’s move on. Suppose that one of my robots did encounter an alien intelligence. What would happen?
Problems of this sort have occurred to me now and then but I never felt moved to make one the basis of a story.
Consider— How would a robot define a human being in the light of the three laws. The First Law, it seems to me,
offers no difficulty: “A robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to
harm.”
Fine, there need be no caviling about the kind of a human being. It wouldn’t matter whether they were male or
female, short or tall, old or young, wise or foolish. Anything that can define a human being biologically will suffice.
The Second Law is a different matter altogether: “A robot must obey orders given it by a human being except where
that would conflict with the First Law.”
That has always made me uneasy. Suppose a robot on board ship is given an order by someone who knows nothing
about ships, and that order would put the ship and everyone on board into danger. Is the robot obliged to obey? Of
file:///E|/Documents%20and%20Settings/Princess%20...and%20Aliens%20Book%201%20-%20Stephen%20Leigh.htm (2 of 77)11/19/2005 4:01:09 AM