Housing Forecasts via Stock Market Indicators
Varun Mittalaand Laura P. Schaposnik?,b,
(?) Corresponding author: schapos@uic.edu
Through the reinterpretation of housing data as candlesticks, we extend Nature Scientific Reports
article by Liang and Unwin [LU22] on stock market indicators for COVID-19 data, and utilize some
of the most prominent technical indicators from the stock market to estimate future changes in
the housing market, comparing the findings to those one would obtain from studying real estate
ETF’s. By providing an analysis of MACD, RSI, and Candlestick indicators (Bullish Engulfing,
Bearish Engulfing, Hanging Man, and Hammer), we exhibit their statistical significance in making
predictions for USA data sets (using Zillow Housing data) and also consider their applications within
three different scenarios: a stable housing market, a volatile housing market, and a saturated market.
In particular, we show that bearish indicators have a much higher statistical significance then bullish
indicators, and we further illustrate how in less stable or more populated countries, bearish trends
are only slightly more statistically present compared to bullish trends.
Keywords: Stock market indicators, housing market, trend study
I. INTRODUCTION
The mathematical study of housing markets dates back
to the 1970s [Kir76], and its prominence has seen a sig-
nificant increase in the last decades, as consumers are
increasingly looking at the right time to make a signifi-
cant investment [GLB19]. Whilst classical studies have
included complex models and economic examinations to
varying levels of success [Car89], after the housing market
crashed in 2008 it became clear that new models are nec-
essary to understand both the local and global behaviour
of housing markets. Since then, more novel approaches
begun to be implemented [Kha08], but these are yet to
become as robust or successful as they could potentially
be [KM71]. Purchasing a house is never easy, and buying
at the optimal time is a significant decision. As a result
of COVID, the housing market has become more volatile
and has fluctuated significantly [LS21]. Therefore, we
propose the utilization of technical indicators that are
commonly applied in the stock market to the housing
markets to identify both bearish and bullish trends in
the housing market, where
(a) a trend is considered bullish if it is corresponds to
an increase in value for a time series.
(b) a trend is considered bearish if it corresponds to
a decrease in value for a time series.
In a recent Nature Scientific Reports article, Liang and
Unwin proposed to use stock market indicators to under-
stand trends in COVID-19 cases in the US [LU22]. In-
spired by this work, we shall consider Zillow’s data set of
the USA’s housing market and study it through examin-
ing the usability of statistical indicators usually seen in
the stock market such as MACD Bearish, MACD Bullish,
RSI Bearish, RSI Bullish, Hanging Man, and Hammer.
These indicators can be used to identify trends (both
bearish and bullish) that can be vital when it comes to
house purchasing decisions. In what follows we shall show
via these indicators, trends (both bearish and bullish) can
be detected and used to understand housing prices.
For each indicator we calculate the statistical signif-
icance using the Wilcoxon test, and show in particular
that while both RSI indicators were statistically signifi-
cant, only the bearish indicator is significant for MACD.
Finally, we extend our analysis to other countries, with
the intent of being able to make insights in various types
of markets. To be encompassing and robust, we consid-
ered different types of markets (Saturated, Volatile and
Stable) and studied the relevance of the indicators within
each setting. In particular, we show that
•across all countries, bearish indicators were much
more statistically significant compared to bullish
indicators, for the vast majority of indicators..
•the difference in the statistical significance of
bullish and bearish trends isn’t nearly as large in
saturated and volatile housing markets.
•when using sock market indicators directly on hous-
ing prices, the trends of the housing price can be
predicted more accuratedly than when considering
the indicators on housing ETFs.
To carry out our study, we considered RSI, MACD,
and Candlestick Analysis conducted through R. After
grouping grouping Zillow’s data [zil21] into Heikin Ashi
candlesticks, we scanned the data for the four candle-
stick indicators mentioned above and used the Wilcox,
and later performed a similar procedure for the other in-
dicators. After introducing some background in Section
II, we dedicate Section Vand Section VI to the main
findings of our work, which can be seen in two different
directions in terms of the indicators themselves and their
statistical significance in various markets. To highlight
the utility of our approach vs any standard stock mar-
ket study of Housing ETFs, we compared our findings
to what one can deduce through the same indicators on
the most used Housing ETFs, namely VNQ (Vanguard
Real Estate ETF), SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF), and
XLRE (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) in Section
??. Finally, we expand on the analysis and applications
of the above findings in Section VII. Finally, we also at-
tached our code for the project on Github [MS22].
arXiv:2210.10146v1 [econ.GN] 18 Oct 2022