INHA-NTG-112022 Gravitational form factors of the baryon octet with avor SU3 symmetry breaking Ho-Yeon Won1June-Young Kim1 2yand Hyun-Chul Kim1 3z

2025-05-05 0 0 1.46MB 27 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
INHA-NTG-11/2022
Gravitational form factors of the baryon octet with flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking
Ho-Yeon Won,1, June-Young Kim,1, 2, and Hyun-Chul Kim1, 3,
1Department of Physics, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, South Korea
2Theory Center, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
3School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS), Seoul 02455, South Korea
(Dated: October 10, 2022)
We investigate the gravitational form factors of the baryon octet within the framework of the
SU(3) chiral quark-soliton model, considering the effects of flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking, and
the corresponding energy-momentum tensor distributions. We examine the effects of flavor SU(3)
symmetry breaking to the mass, angular momentum, pressure, and shear force distributions of the
baryon octet. We first find that a heavier baryon is energetically more compact than a lighter
one. For the spin distributions of the baryon octet, they are properly normalized to their spins
and are decomposed into the flavor-singlet axial charge and the orbital angular momentum even
when the flavor SU(3) symmetry is broken. While the effects of the flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking
differently contribute to the angular momentum distributions for the octet baryons, they are found
to be rather small. The spin and orbital angular momentum almost equally contribute to the
angular momentum distributions for the octet baryons. We also estimate the effects of the flavor
SU(3) symmetry breaking to the pressure and shear force distributions. Interestingly, even if we
include the effects of the SU(3) flavor symmetry breaking, the shear force distributions are kept to
be positive over r. It indicates that the Polyakov & Schweitzer local stability condition is kept to
be intact with the flavor SU(3) symmetry broken. Lastly, we discuss how much the gravitational
form factors vary with the effects of flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking considered.
I. INTRODUCTION
It is of great importance to understand the mechanical structure of a baryon as much as the electromagnetic (EM)
one, since it reveals how the baryon is mechanically shaped by its partons. The gravitational form factors (GFFs) of
a baryon provide information on its mechanical properties such as the mass, spin, pressure, and shear force. At an
early stage, the GFFs were considered as a purely academic subject [1, 2] due to the difficulty in having access to
them experimentally. However, the generalized parton distributions (GPDs) have paved way for extracting the GFFs
experimentally, since the EM form factors and GFFs are defined respectively as the first and second Mellin moments
of the GPDs that can be measured by the hard exclusive process such as deeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS)
or hard exclusive meson production. Recently, the first measurement of the nucleon D-term form factors from DVCS
was reported [3–5]. The transition GPDs will soon be extracted from the experimental data on the hard exclusive
meson production p++πat Jefferson Lab (JLab) [6, 7]. This measurement will lead to the N∆ transition
GFFs [8]. Moreover, the upcoming Electric-Ion Collider (EIC) project will unveil the fractions of the mass and spin
of the nucleon, which are taken up by quarks and gluons inside it. It is well known that the quark content of the
nucleon spin is small (see a recent review [9]) and the strange quark is polarized negatively (∆s∼ −0.10 [10]). This
implies that the gluon spin and the orbital motion of the quarks and gluon should considerably contribute to the
nucleon spin. The future EIC project will provide a clue to the spin structure of the nucleon.
The GFFs for spin-1/2 particles parametrize the matrix element of the energy-momentum tensor (EMT) current [1,
2, 11, 12]. It was recently generalized to higher-spin particles [13] in a systematic way. Based on this parametrization,
the GFFs of the nucleon have been intensively investigated in various approaches [14–42]. The parity flip transition [43–
45] and N∆ transition [8] matrix elements of the EMT current were also parametrized. For a spin-1 particle,
the model-independent formalism for the GFFs and distributions were studied in Refs. [46–50] and the GFFs were
obtained by many theoretical works [37, 51–53]. The GFFs for a spin-3/2 particle were also examined [37, 54–56].
On the other hand, the GFFs of the baryon octet were much less studied [57]. To compute them, we need to consider
the flavor SU(3) symmetry and its breakdown. Since the effects of the flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking on the GFFs
and related distributions have never been examined, it is worthwhile to investigate them. In particular, it is critical
to check whether the local and global stability conditions are satisfied with the flavor SU(3) symmetry broken.
E-mail: hoywon@inha.edu
E-mail: Jun-Young.Kim@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
E-mail: hchkim@inha.ac.kr
arXiv:2210.03320v1 [hep-ph] 7 Oct 2022
2
While the three-dimensional (3D) EMT distributions, which show how partons are spatially distributed inside a
baryon in the Breit frame (BF) [58], were obtained by the 3D Fourier transform of the corresponding GFFs, there
have been serious criticisms of the 3D distributions of the nucleon [59–63]. The 3D distributions depend on the shape
of the wave packet of a baryon, and this wave packet cannot be localized below the Compton wavelength. It brings
about ambiguous relativistic effects of which the contribution is approximately by around 20 % for the nucleon. Thus,
they cannot be neglected anymore. To circumvent these ambiguous relativistic effects, the two-dimensional (2D)
spatial EMT distributions have been considered in the infinite momentum frame (IMF) or on the light-front (LF).
The ambiguous relativistic corrections are kinematically suppressed then [26, 41, 42]. However, we have to pay the
price that we lose information in the longitudinal direction.
There is yet another way of understanding the 3D distributions by defining them using the Wigner phase-space
distribution. While it does not furnish the 3D distributions with the probabilistic meaning, it allows us to treat their
relativistic effects. Moreover, it shows that the 3D BF and 2D IMF distributions can naturally be interpolated in
the Wigner sense. Thus, we can trace down the origin of the relativistic corrections to the 2D IMF distributions.
At the same time, a direct connection between the 3D BF and 2D IMF distributions was found to be the IMF Abel
transform [64, 65]. Note that, very recently, a novel concept of the 3D strict probabilistic distribution was introduced
to remove ambiguous relativistic corrections [66, 67]. In this work, we first define the 3D BF distributions in the
Wigner sense and then map out the 2D IMF ones by using the IMF Abel transform.
In the current work, we will scrutinize the GFFs of the baryon octet and pertinent three-dimensional distributions
within the framework of a pion mean-field approach or the chiral quark-soliton model (χQSM) [68–70]. E. Witten
in his seminal paper [71, 72] inspired the idea of the meson mean-field approach. In the limit of a large number of
colors (Nc), the quantum fluctuations are of order 1/Nc, so that it can be ignored. Thus, a baryon can be viewed
as Ncvalence quarks bound by a pion mean field that arises from a classical solution of the equation of motion.
To put more explicitly, the presence of the Ncvalence quarks polarizes the vacuum, which produces the pion mean
field. Then the Ncvalence quarks are also influenced by the pion mean field in a self-consistent way. As a result, a
classical baryon appears as a chiral soliton with a hedgehog symmetry, which is composed of the Ncvalence quarks.
While we ignore the 1/Ncmesonic quantum fluctuations, we have to consider the fluctuations of the pion field along
the zero-mode direction. The translational and rotational zero modes are related to the symmetries of the baryon.
Integrating over the zero modes completely, we can restore the correct quantum numbers of the baryon [68, 70]. The
χQSM successfully described various properties of the baryon octet and decuplet such as the EM properties [73–
79], axial-vector structures [80–82], tensor charges [83, 84], GFFs [65, 85–88], and partonic structures [89–97]. It
has also been extended to singly heavy baryons [98–106]. The GFFs of the singly heavy baryons were also studied
within the χQSM [88]. The χQSM can also be associated with quantum chromodyanmics (QCD) via the instanton
vacuum [107, 108]. The low-energy QCD effective partition function can be derived from the instanton vacuum.
The dynamical quark mass, which is obtained from the Fourier transform of the fermionic zero mode, is originally
momentum-dependent. In the present work, we turn off the momentum dependence and introduce a regularization
scheme to tame the divergence coming from the quark loops.
The present work is organized as follows: In Section II, we define the GFFs of a spin-1/2 baryon from the matrix
elements of the EMT current. In Section III A, we explain the general formalism for the EMT distributions in both 3D
and 2D cases. In Section IV, we show how the GFFs and the EMT distributions can be computed within a framework
of the SU(3) χQSM, considering the effects of the flavor SU(3) symmetry breaking. In Sec V, the numerical results
for the GFFs and the EMT distributions of the octet baryons are presented and discussed. The last Section devotes
to the summary of the present work and draw conclusions.
II. GRAVITATIONAL FORM FACTORS OF A SPIN-1/2 PARTICLE
The symmetric EMT current in QCD can be derived by varying the QCD action under the Poincar´e transformation
according to N¨other’s theorem with the symmetrization imposed for a particle with nonzero spin [109–111]. More
directly, one can derive the symmetric EMT current by taking a functional derivative of the QCD action [1, 112] with
respect to the metric tensor of a curved background field. The symmetric total EMT operator consists of the quark
(q) and gluon (g) parts, which are respectively expressed as
ˆ
Tµν
q=i
4¯
ψqγµ
Dνψq+¯
ψqγν
Dµψq¯
ψqγµ
Dνψq¯
ψqγν
Dµψqgµν ¯
ψqi
2
/
D − i
2
/
D − ˆmqψq,
ˆ
Tµν
g=Fa,µηFa, ν
η+1
4gµν Fa,κηFa,
κη.(1)
3
Here, the covariant derivatives are defined as
Dµ=
µ+igtaAa
µ.tarepresent the SU(3) color group generators that
satisfy the commutation relations [ta, tb] = ifabctcand are normalized to be tr(tatb) = 1
2δab.ψqdenotes the quark
field with flavor qand ˆmqdesignates the corresponding current quark mass. Fa,µη stands for the gluon field strength
expressed as Fa
µν =µAa
ννAa
µgfabcAb
µAc
ν. The total EMT operator is conserved as follows:
µˆ
Tµν = 0,ˆ
Tµν =X
q
ˆ
Tµν
q+ˆ
Tµν
g,(2)
For the lowest-lying octet baryon, the matrix element of the EMT current can be parametrized in terms of the
three GFFs [1, 2, 113]:
hB, p0, J0
3|ˆ
Tµν (0)|B, p, J3i
= ¯u(p0, J0
3)"AB(t)PµPν
mB
+JB(t)i(Pµσνρ +Pνσµρ)∆ρ
2mB
+DB(t)µνgµν 2
4mB#u(p, J3),(3)
which depends on the spin polarizations J3and J0
3, the average momentum P= (p+p0)/2 of the initial and final
states, and the four-momentum transfer ∆ = p0p. The squared momentum transfer is denoted by t= ∆2. The
on-shell conditions of the final and initial four momenta are given by p02=p2=m2
Bwhere mBdenotes the mass
of the octet baryon. In the BF, these GFFs AB(t), JB(t), and DB(t) are traditionally understood as the mass,
angular momentum, and D-term form factors, respectively. Here, one should keep in mind that in the level of the
quark and gluon degrees of freedom we have one additional form factor ¯c, which is constrained to satisfy the relation
Pa=q,g ¯ca(t) = 0. It can be dropped because of the conservation of the total EMT current.
III. ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR DISTRIBUTIONS
In the BF, a 3D distribution is traditionally defined as a Fourier transformation of the corresponding form factor.
Since, however, the baryon cannot be localized below the Compton wavelength, it causes ambiguous relativistic correc-
tions. These corrections are up to 20 % for the nucleon. In the non-relativistic picture, they are often neglected. In the
large Nclimit, the frame dependence of the distribution was carefully examined in Ref. [114]. These 3D distributions
in the BF can be understood quasi-probabilistic distributions in phase space or the Wigner distributions [26, 115–117].
To obtain the quantum-mechanical probabilistic distributions, one should take the IMF or the LF frame such that
the relativistic corrections are kinematically suppressed and the nucleon is described as a transversely localized state.
This yields 2D transverse densities in the IMF or on the LF.
The matrix element of the EMT current for a physical state |ψican be expressed in terms of the Wigner distribution
as [116]
hˆ
Tµν (r)i=Zd3P
(2π)3Zd3RW(R,P)hˆ
Tµν (r)iR,P,(4)
where W(R,P) represents the Wigner distribution given by
W(R,P) = Zd3
(2π)3ei·R˜
ψP+
2˜
ψP
2
=Zd3zeiz·PψRz
2ψR+z
2.(5)
The average position Rand momentum Pare defined as R= (r0+r)/2 and P= (p0+p)/2, respectively. =p0p
denotes the three-momentum transfer, which enables us to get access to the internal structure of a particle. The
variable z=r0rstands for the position separation between the initial and final particles. The Wigner distribution
contains information on the wave packet of a particle
ψ(r) = hr|ψi=Zd3p
(2π3)eip·r˜
ψ(p),˜
ψ(p) = 1
p2p0hp|ψi,(6)
where the plane-wave states |piand |riare respectively normalized as hp0|pi= 2p0(2π)3δ(3)(p0p) and hr0|ri=
δ(3)(r0r). The position state |rilocalized at rat time t= 0 is defined as a Fourier transform of the momentum
4
eigenstate |pi
|ri=Zd3p
(2π)3p2p0eip·r|pi.(7)
If we integrate over the average position and momentum, then the probabilistic density in either position or momentum
space is recovered to be
Zd3P
(2π)3WN(R,P) = |ψN(R)|2,Zd3RWN(R,P) = |˜
ψN(P)|2.(8)
Given Pand R, the matrix element hˆ
Tµν (r)iR,Pconveys information on the internal structure of the particle
localized around the average position Rand average momentum P. This can be expressed as the 3D Fourier transform
of the matrix element hB, p0, J0
3|ˆ
Tµν (0)|B, p, J3i:
hˆ
Tµν (r)iR,P=hˆ
Tµν (0)ix,P=Zd3
(2π)3eix·1
p2p0p2p00hp0, J0
3|ˆ
Tµν (0)|p, J3i,(9)
with the shifted position vector x=rR. Note that, very recently, a novel concept of the 3D strict probabilistic
distribution was introduced to remove ambiguous relativistic corrections [66, 67].
A. Three-dimensional energy-momentum tensor distributions in the Breit frame
Having integrated over Pof Eq. (4), we find that the part of the wave packet can be factorized. Thus, the target
in the BF is understood as a localized state around Rfrom the Wigner perspective. In this frame, Eq. (9) is reduced
to
Tµν
BF,B(r, J0
3, J3) = Zd3
(2π)32P0
ei·rhB, p0, J0
3|ˆ
Tµν (0)|B, p, J3i.(10)
From now on we use rinstead of x, i.e., x=rRr. In the Wigner sense, the temporal component of the EMT
current yields mass distribution:
T00
BF,B(r, J0
3, J3) = εB(r)δJ0
3J3=mBZd3
(2π)3ei·rAB(t)t
4m2
BAB(t)2JB(t) + DB(t)δJ0
3J3.(11)
By Integrating T00
BF,B over 3D space, one obviously gets the mass of a baryon in the rest frame
Zd3rT 00
BF,B(r, J0
3, J3) = mBAB(0) = mB,(12)
with the normalization AB(0) = 1. Note that, for a higher-spin particle (J1), a quadrupole distribution of the
energy inside the particle appears [46–49, 56, 118, 119]. The size of the mass distribution can be quantified by the
mass radius. It is given by either integral of the mass distribution or derivative of the mass form factor AB(t) with
respect to the momentum squared,
hr2
εiB=Rd3r r2εB(r)
Rd3r εB(r)=6
AB(0)
dAB(t)
dt t=0
.(13)
The 0k-component of the EMT current is related to the spatial distribution of the spin carried by the partons inside
a baryon:
Ji
B(r, J0
3, J3) = ijkrjT0k
BF,B(r, J0
3, J3)
= 2Sj
J0
3J3Zd3
(2π)3ei·rJB(t) + 2
3tJB(t)
dt δij +ij1
32δij JB(t)
dt .(14)
In principle, both the monopole and quadrupole distributions should be considered when we deal with the spin
distribution. However, we drop the quadrupole contribution for simplicity, which does not affect the normalization of
5
the spin form factor JB(0). The quadrupole structure of the spin distribution was intensively discussed and related
to the monopole distribution in Refs. [120, 121]. The monopole contribution to the spin distribution, which is the
first term in Eq. (14), is defined as
ρB
J(r) := Zd3
(2π)3ei·rJB(t) + 2
3tJB(t)
dt .(15)
Integrating Ji
B(r, J0
3, J3) over space gives the spin of the baryon as follows
Zd3rJi
B(r, J0
3, J3) = 2 ˆ
Si
J0
3J3Zd3r ρB
J(r)=2ˆ
Si
J0
3J3JB(0) = ˆ
Si
J0
3J3,(16)
which is just the spin operator of a baryon. The quadrupole contribution, the second term in Eq. (14), obviously
vanishes after the integration over the 3D space.
The spatial components EMT current Tij
BF,B provides information on the mechanical properties of a baryon. It can
be decomposed into isotropic and anisotropic contributions. This anisotropic contribution plays a significant role in
the mechanical structure of a baryon [26, 113]. They are respectively referred to as the pressure pB(r) and shear force
sB(r) and expressed as [58, 113]
Tij
BF,B(r, J0
3, J3) = pB(r)δij δJ0
3J3+sB(r)rirj
r21
3δij δJ0
3J3,(17)
where the pressure and shear force distributions are respectively defined as
pB(r) = 1
6mB
1
r2
1
dr r2d
dr ˜
DB(r), sB(r) = 1
4mB
rd
dr
1
r
d
dr ˜
DB(r),with ˜
DB(r) = Zd3
(2π)3ei·rDB(t).(18)
From Eq. (18), it is easy to see that the 3D von Laue stability condition for the pressure is automatically satisfied:
Zd3r pB(r)=0.(19)
It indicates that the pressure should have at least one nodal point. In addition, the pressure and shear force distribu-
tions automatically comply with the differential equation derived from the total EMT conservation:
iTij
BF,B(r, J0
3, J3) = rj
r2
3
sB(r)
r +2sB(r)
r+pB(r)
r δJ0
3J3= 0.(20)
It gives a number of the integral relations between pressure and shear force. One of them is the 2D von Laue stability
condition that is derived as
Z
0
dr r 1
3sB(r) + pB(r)= 0.(21)
The combination 1
3sB(r) + pB(r) carries the meaning of the tangential force distribution. It is an eigenvalue of the
stress tensor and it must at least have one nodal point such that it complies with the 2D von Laue condition (21).
Moreover, in Refs. [26, 113, 122], the local stability conditions were conjectured:
2
3sB(r) + pB(r)>0, sB(r)>0.(22)
The combination 2
3sB(r) + pB(r) bears the meaning of the normal force distribution and is again identified as an
eigenvalue of the stress tensor. Equation (22) implies that at any distance rthe normal force should be directed
outwards. This Polyakov-Schweitzer local stability condition was examined in various contexts [26, 88, 113, 122]. The
value of the D-term form factor at zero momentum transfer is obtained by integrating the pressure or shear-force
distributions over 3D space as
DB(0) = 4mB
15 Zd3r r2sB(r) = mBZd3r r2pB(r),(23)
and the positive shear force for any value of rimplies the negative D-term. In addition, the positivity of the normal
forces (22) enables us to define the mechanical radius:
hr2
mechiB=Rd3r r22
3sB(r) + pB(r)
Rd3r2
3sB(r) + pB(r)=6DB(0)
R0
−∞ DB(t)dt.(24)
摘要:

INHA-NTG-11/2022GravitationalformfactorsofthebaryonoctetwithavorSU(3)symmetrybreakingHo-YeonWon,1,June-YoungKim,1,2,yandHyun-ChulKim1,3,z1DepartmentofPhysics,InhaUniversity,Incheon402-751,SouthKorea2TheoryCenter,Je ersonLab,NewportNews,VA23606,USA3SchoolofPhysics,KoreaInstituteforAdvancedStudy(KIAS...

展开>> 收起<<
INHA-NTG-112022 Gravitational form factors of the baryon octet with avor SU3 symmetry breaking Ho-Yeon Won1June-Young Kim1 2yand Hyun-Chul Kim1 3z.pdf

共27页,预览5页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:27 页 大小:1.46MB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-05-05

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 27
客服
关注