
Quantum spatial search with electric potential : long-time dynamics and robustness
to noise
Thibault Fredon,1, ∗Julien Zylberman,2Pablo Arnault,1and Fabrice Debbasch2
1Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, ENS Paris-Saclay, INRIA,
Laboratoire Méthodes Formelles, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2Sorbonne Université, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, CNRS, LERMA, 75005 Paris, France
We present various results on the scheme introduced in Ref. [1], which is a quantum spatial-
search algorithm on a two-dimensional (2D) square spatial grid, realized with a 2D Dirac discrete-
time quantum walk (DQW) coupled to a Coulomb electric field centered on the marked node. In
such a walk, the electric term acts as the oracle of the algorithm, and the free walk (i.e., without
electric term) acts as the “diffusion” part, as it is called in Grover’s algorithm. The results are
the following. First, we run simulations of this electric Dirac DQW during longer times than
explored in Ref. [1], and observe that there is a second localization peak around the node marked
by the oracle, reached in a time O(√N), where Nis the number of nodes of the 2D grid, with a
localization probability scaling as O(1/ln N). This matches the state-of-the-art 2D DQW search
algorithms before amplitude amplification [2]. We then study the effect of adding noise on the
Coulomb potential, and observe that the walk, especially the second localization peak, is highly
robust to spatial noise, more modestly robust to spatiotemporal noise, and that the first localization
peak is even highly robust to spatiotemporal noise.
I. INTRODUCTION
Discrete-time quantum walks (DQWs) correspond to
the one-particle sector of quantum cellular automata
[3,4]. They can simulate numerous physical systems,
ranging from particles in arbitrary Yang-Mills gauge
fields [5] and massless Dirac fermions near black holes
[6], to charged quantum fluids [7], see also Refs. [8–18]
for other physics-oriented applications.
Moreover, DQWs can be seen as quantum analogs of
classical random walks (CRWs) [19], and can be used
to build spatial-search algorithms that outperform [20]
those built with CRWs. Continuous-time quantum walks
can also be used for such a purpose [21]. In 3spatial di-
mensions, DQW-based algorithms [20,21] find the loca-
tion of a marked node with a constant localization prob-
ability1after O(√N)time steps, with Nthe number
of nodes of the three-dimensional grid, and this is ex-
actly the bound reached by Grover’s algorithm [22–27].
However, no two-dimensional (2D) QW proposed so far
reaches Grover’s lower bound.
The state-of-the-art result using a 2D DQW was ob-
tained by Tulsi in Ref. [2]: Tulsi’s algorithm finds a
marked node with a localization probability scaling as
O(1/ln N)in O(√N)time steps, where Nis the total
number of nodes. To reach a probability independent
of N, several amplitude amplification time steps have to
be performed after the quantum-walk part. These extra
time steps are Grover’s algorithm time steps, see Ref.
[28]. Taking the amplitude amplification into account,
Tulsi’s algorithm reaches an O(1) localization probabil-
ity after O(√Nln N)time steps.
Other schemes of 2D DQW for spatial search have fol-
∗thibault.fredon@ens-paris-saclay.fr
1We call “localization probability” the probability to be at the
marked node, or nodes if there are several of them.
lowed, such as the one by Roget et al. in Ref. [29], where
the 2D DQW simulates a massless Dirac fermion on a
grid with defects. This scheme is inspired by physics,
and it reaches Tulsi’s bound using a coin of dimension 2
instead of 4. Recently, Zylberman and Debbasch intro-
duced in Ref. [1] a new DQW scheme for 2D quantum
spatial search. This scheme implements quantum search
by simulating the dynamics of a massless Dirac fermion
in a Coulomb electric field centered on the nodes to be
found. We call this DQW “electric Dirac DQW”2. In this
walk, the oracle is a position-dependent phase.
This oracle is diagonal in the position basis and can be
efficiently implemented on nqubits up to an error using
O(1
)primitive quantum gates [30]. This total number of
quantum gates is independant of nand makes possible
the implementation of the oracle on current Noisy Inter-
mediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices and on future
universal quantum computers.
Note also that the algorithm proposed in Ref. [1] con-
stitues actually a paradigm change in the construction of
search algorithms, because it is based on the physically
motivated idea that the position of the marked node can
be encoded in the shape of an artificial force field which
acts on the quantum walker.
One of the main results of Zylberman and Debbasch’s
paper [1] is a localization probability which displays a
2We call “Dirac DQW” a DQW that has as a continuum limit
the Dirac equation. Throughout this paper, the terminology
“electric Dirac DQW” will always refer to a Dirac DQW coupled
to a Coulomb electric potential, unless otherwise stated. In the
literature other types of electric potentials have been considered.
The reason why we do not specify the term “Coulomb” in the
present denomination “electric Dirac DQW” is because the idea
we want to convey is that the marked node is encoded in the
shape of the electric potential, but the precise form of the electric
potential, e.g., here, the fact that it is a Coulomb potential, may
not be that relevant.
arXiv:2210.13920v1 [quant-ph] 25 Oct 2022