Quantum Thermodynamics applied for Quantum Refrigerators cooling down a qubit Hideaki Okane1Shunsuke Kamimura1 2Shingo Kukita3Yasushi Kondo3and Yuichiro Matsuzaki1 4 1Research Center for Emerging Computing Technologies RCECT

2025-04-29 0 0 661.21KB 10 页 10玖币
侵权投诉
Quantum Thermodynamics applied for Quantum Refrigerators cooling down a qubit
Hideaki Okane,1Shunsuke Kamimura,1, 2 Shingo Kukita,3Yasushi Kondo,3and Yuichiro Matsuzaki1, 4,
1Research Center for Emerging Computing Technologies (RCECT),
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST),
1-1-1, Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
2Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8571, Japan
3Department of Physics, Kindai University, Higashi-Osaka 577-8502, Japan and
4NEC-AIST Quantum Technology Cooperative Research Laboratory,
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
(Dated: October 7, 2022)
We discuss a quantum refrigerator to increase the ground state probability of a target qubit
whose energy difference between the ground and excited states is less than the thermal energy of
the environment. We consider two types of quantum refrigerators: (1) one extra qubit with frequent
pulse operations and (2) two extra qubits without them. These two types of refrigerators are
evaluated from the viewpoint of quantum thermodynamics. More specifically, we calculate the heat
removed from the target qubit, the work done for the system, and the coefficient of performance
(COP), the ratio between the heat ant the work. We show that the COP of the second type
outperforms that of the first type. Our results are useful to design a high-performance quantum
refrigerator cooling down a qubit.
I. INTRODUCTION
Thermodynamics has traditionally explained macro-
scopic behavior of classical systems. For example, a re-
frigerator is essential not only for daily life but also for
academic purposes. We need a refrigerator for realizing
interesting phenomena, such as superfluidity, supercon-
ductivity, Bose-Einstein Condensation, and so on [1].
On the other hand, many efforts have been devoted to
extending the conventional thermodynamics to the quan-
tum one [2–5]. Such an extension is called quantum ther-
modynamics. Quantum thermodynamics define the ther-
modynamic properties of microscopic systems: heat and
work. Quantum thermodynamics helps to understand a
quantum refrigerator, which increases the population of
the ground state of a target quantum system. To quan-
tify the performance of a quantum refrigerator, quanti-
ties such as coefficient of performance (COP) and cooling
power are evaluated [6–10].
Electron spin resonance (ESR) is an important tech-
nique to detect target electron spins, which gives informa-
tion of various materials [11]. ESR has recently been per-
formed with several types of quantum detectors such as
a superconducting circuit [12–24] and nitrogen vacancy
(NV) centers [25–31]. Such a kind of detector can also
be utilized as a quantum refrigerator to polarize target
spins [32, 33]. To improve the sensitivity of the ESR,
polarizing the target spins is essential. Therefore, eval-
uation of a quantum refrigerator should contribute to a
further improvement of the ESR sensitivity.
In this work, we evaluate the performance of two
types of quantum refrigerators: (1) one extra qubit
with frequent pulse operations and (2) two extra qubits
matsuzaki.yuichiro@aist.go.jp
without them. The former corresponds to the realized
scheme [32, 33]. The latter is a newly proposed method
in this paper, in which one of the extra qubits is for quan-
tum control and the other is for the heat release to the
environment. We calculate the heat removed from the
target qubit, the work done for the system, and the COP
for these two approaches. According to the analysis of
them based on quantum thermodynamics, we find that
the latter outperforms the former in terms of the COP.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. §II
reviews the definition of heat and work in the bipartite
quantum system, based on Ref. [34]. We present two
models with and without frequent reset in §III and an-
alyze their performance from the viewpoint of quantum
thermodynamics in §IV. §V summarizes our results. In
appendix A, we explain the possible experimental realiza-
tion of our scheme with current technology. In appendix
B, we explain the detail of the conventional protocol. In
appencix C, we calculate the work necessary for a qubit
initialization. We take the natural unit system and thus
we omit ~and kBin this paper.
II. THE DEFINITION OF WORK AND HEAT
BETWEEN INTERACTING BIPARTITE
SYSTEMS
Let us review the definition of work and heat trans-
ferred between an interacting bipartite quantum system
(a target and extra qubits) based on quantum thermo-
dynamics [34]. In order to quantify the cooling effect, we
need to evaluate a heat transfer from the target qubit to
the extra qubit.
To calculate heat and work in a quantum system, we
need to define an internal energy. In a single system
with a Hamiltonian Hand a density matrix ρ, the in-
ternal energy is defined as Tr(ρH). By differentiating
arXiv:2210.02681v1 [quant-ph] 6 Oct 2022
2
the internal energy with time, we obtain d
dt (Tr(ρH)) =
Tr( ˙ρH) + Tr(ρ˙
H). Here, Tr( ˙ρH) and Tr(ρ˙
H) are defined
as the heat and the work, respectively. However, when
we consider a bipartite system, it is not straightforward
to define the internal energy for each system. We con-
sider a bipartite system consisting of system A and B.
The Hamiltonian is given as
H=HAIB+IAHB+HAB,(1)
where HA(HB) is the Hamiltonian for system A (B),
HAB is the interaction Hamiltonian, IA(IB) denotes
identity operator for system A (B). Let ρdenote the
density matrix of the total system. The reduced den-
sity matrix of system A (B) is defined as ρA= TrB(ρ)
(ρB= TrA(ρ)). We introduce the correlation between
system A and B as
χ=ρρAρB.(2)
The naive definition of the internal energy for sys-
tem Amay be given as TrA(ρAHA). However, the re-
duced density matrix ρAcan be accessible to the inter-
action Hamiltonian, namely, TrA((ρAIB)HAB)6= 0.
So, we should take into account the contribution from
the interaction Hamiltonian to define the internal en-
ergy for each system. We reconstruct the Hamiltonian
H=H(eff)
AIB+IAH(eff)
B+H(eff)
AB for the reduced
density matrix to be inaccessible to the effective interac-
tion Hamiltonian, satisfying the following conditions
TrA(ρAIB)H(eff)
AB = 0,(3)
TrB(IAρB)H(eff)
AB = 0.(4)
We adopt such effective Hamiltonians H(eff)
Aand H(eff)
B
to define the internal energy for system A and B, respec-
tively. Thus, the heat and the work to system A is given
as TrA˙ρAH(eff)
Aand TrAρA˙
H(eff)
A, respectively. In
the following, we specifically derive the effective Hamil-
tonian.
We show how to construct the Hamiltonian satisfying
Eqs. (3) and (4). The time evolution of the total density
matrix is written as,
(t)
dt =i[H(t), ρ(t)] ,(5)
H(t) = HA(t)IB+IAHB+HAB.(6)
By taking the partial trace of system B in Eq. (5), we
obtain the time-evolution equation for system A,
A(t)
dt =i[H0
A(t), ρA(t)] iTrB([HAB, χ(t)]) ,(7)
H0
A(t) = HA(t) + TrB((IAρB(t)) HAB).(8)
Similarly, the time-evolution equation for the system B
is given as,
B(t)
dt =i[H0
B(t), ρB(t)] iTrA([HAB, χ(t)]) ,(9)
H0
B(t) = HB+ TrA((ρA(t)IB)HAB).(10)
By using the new Hamiltonian H0
A(t) and H0
B(t), we can
rewrite the Hamiltonian as follows,
H=H0
A(t)IB+IAH0
B(t) + H0
AB(t),(11)
H0
AB(t) = HAB TrB((IAρB(t)) HAB)IB(12)
IATrA((ρA(t)IB)HAB),(13)
where H0
AB(t) denotes the new interaction Hamiltonian.
Now, let us check whether the reduced density matrix
ρAis inaccessible to the new interaction Hamiltonian
H0
AB(t),
TrA((ρA(t)IB)H0
AB(t)) = Tr ((ρA(t)ρB(t)) HAB)IB.
(14)
The reduced density matrix is still accessible
to the interaction Hamiltonian. However, since
Tr ((ρA(t)ρB(t)) HAB) is a scalar quantity, we can
define the effective interaction Hamiltonian to extract
the scalar part as follows,
H(eff)
AB (t) = H0
AB(t) + Tr ((ρA(t)ρB(t)) HAB) (IAIB).
(15)
This satisfies the inaccessible condition of Eqs. (3) and
(4). By using the effective interaction Hamiltonian, the
total one can be rewritten as,
H(t) = H(eff)
A(t)IB+IAH(eff)
B(t) + H(eff)
AB (t),
(16)
H(eff)
A(t) = H0
A(t)(1 α)Tr ((ρA(t)ρB(t)) HAB)IA,
(17)
H(eff)
B(t) = H0
B(t)αTr ((ρA(t)ρB(t)) HAB)IB,(18)
where an arbitrary parameter αRis introduced for the
general expression of the effective Hamiltonian.
By using the effective Hamiltonian, we define the in-
ternal energy as follows,
U= Tr (ρ(t)H(t)) = UA+UB+Uχ,(19)
UA= TrAρA(t)H(eff)
A(t),(20)
UB= TrBρB(t)H(eff)
B(t),(21)
Uχ= Tr χ(t)H(eff)
AB (t),(22)
where UA(UB) is the internal energy of the reduced den-
sity matrix ρA(t) (ρB(t)), and Uχis the internal energy
of the correlation χ(t). The heat flux ˙
QA(˙
QB) to system
A (B) is defined as,
˙
QA(t) = TrA˙ρA(t)H(eff)
A(t)
=iTr ([HAB, χ(t)] (H0
A(t)IB)) ,(23)
˙
QB(t) = TrB˙ρB(t)H(eff)
B(t)
=iTr ([HAB, χ(t)] (IAH0
B(t))) ,(24)
摘要:

QuantumThermodynamicsappliedforQuantumRefrigeratorscoolingdownaqubitHideakiOkane,1ShunsukeKamimura,1,2ShingoKukita,3YasushiKondo,3andYuichiroMatsuzaki1,4,1ResearchCenterforEmergingComputingTechnologies(RCECT),NationalInstituteofAdvancedIndustrialScienceandTechnology(AIST),1-1-1,Umezono,Tsukuba,Ibar...

展开>> 收起<<
Quantum Thermodynamics applied for Quantum Refrigerators cooling down a qubit Hideaki Okane1Shunsuke Kamimura1 2Shingo Kukita3Yasushi Kondo3and Yuichiro Matsuzaki1 4 1Research Center for Emerging Computing Technologies RCECT.pdf

共10页,预览2页

还剩页未读, 继续阅读

声明:本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。玖贝云文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知玖贝云文库,我们立即给予删除!
分类:图书资源 价格:10玖币 属性:10 页 大小:661.21KB 格式:PDF 时间:2025-04-29

开通VIP享超值会员特权

  • 多端同步记录
  • 高速下载文档
  • 免费文档工具
  • 分享文档赚钱
  • 每日登录抽奖
  • 优质衍生服务
/ 10
客服
关注